Ok, I understood better now :) > That being said ... for which part should I setup a job? Well, I would say for squiggly and flexunit (this last one has not even a snapshot yet) but also for all of those projects which generate artifacts / poms (except those built by the last FM as it won't be possible).
Thoughts ? Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:10:43 +0000 > > Ok ... sorry for the spelling ... was trying to follow the discussion using > my phone ... not ideal :-) > > I wanted to say that I only created/updated/maintained the builds.apache.org > jobs for parts I was working on so I didn't create jobs for everything or > re-activate the existing jobs if I wasn't doing something on that part of > flex. > > If you would like me to setup a build for anything, I'd gladly do that. Even > better if it produces Maven artifacts. > > I know that in general it is sub-optimal that we currently can't really > execute Flash or Air tests, but I was more thinking of using > builds.apache.org for automatically creating the SNAPSHOT versions so people > interested in the project don't have to do much to test the latest builds. > > However I did notice that Infra is very interested in giving us the resources > we need to run the tests on their hardware. Also I have the impression that > we have some dedicated build slaves assigned to our projects. (While the > build queue is 30 entries long, whenever I click on a "start build" that > happens automatically and I think I remember to have seen that our build > agent is flagged "flex") > > That being said ... for which part should I setup a job? > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 17:30 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > > @Chris > > I only stop the jobs for parts I was actually working on > Didn't get what you meant, sorry for my English. > > > Could setup that build, if you want > Same here, does it mean you are proposing yourself to create a build at > builds.apache.org ? If there's a way I can help, tell me. > > I think a release should be deployed manually. > Sure, me too, was thinking about automatize the SNAPSHOT deployment only and > find a way to enhance the release process to include the Maven releases > deployment as conveniently as possible, even though it would be ok for > Squiggly, as Alex said, for some of our builds which require tests, we need a > Windows machine, I can't remember for sure but I think we used one from > builds.apache.org, can't remember what was the problem with, can someone > refresh my memory ? > Thanks,Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:58:52 +0000 > > > > We probably should have a Jenkins build for Squiggly running on > > apacheflexbuilds. > > > > We’ve had so many problems with builds.a.o that I wouldn’t want to rely on > > it for nightly builds, but I guess Chris is saying we pretty much have to > > for building release candidates that deploy to Maven? Once we get into > > maven deployment for releases whose build script involves GUI tests we are > > probably going to have problems with builds.a.o again. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 11/20/14, 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > > > >In order to release I usually added install and deploy targets. All the > > >builds with a maven.xml file deploy to the staging repo if the release > > >variable is set to true. > > > > > >I think a release should be deployed manually. > > > > > >Chris > > > > > >Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > > > > >----- Reply message ----- > > >Von: "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >An: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org> > > >Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > > >(FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > > >Datum: Do., Nov. 20, 2014 16:28 > > > > > >Hi Chris, > > >> I think I finished the maven stuff shortly after the release > > >Not sure what you mean, what did you finished exactly ? > > > > > >I've seen it was an Ant build to generate and deploy the maven > > >corresponding artifacts, I even modified them to include RSLs but haven't > > >seen any Jenkins job to run the build and deploy it automatically and > > >therefore, I don't know how the 1.0-SNAPSHOT has been deploy to Apache > > >Maven (probably you ran it manually because you have some credentials ?), > > >for the releases, I can't see anything, why as 1.0 and 1.1 have been > > >released ? can you enlighten me please ? > > >What is the process to release the next one, except a standard vote on > > >RCs , what about the Maven bits ? > > >Should we create a Jenkins job to automatically deploy the current > > >snapshots (currently 1.2-SNAPSHOT) ? > > > > > >Thanks, > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> Subject: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > > >>(FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > > >> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:42:27 +0000 > > >> > > >> I think I finished the maven stuff shortly after the release, if I'm > > >>not remembering it wrong. > > >> > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > >> > > >> ----- Reply message ----- > > >> Von: "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >> An: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org> > > >> Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > > >>(FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > > >> Datum: Do., Nov. 20, 2014 14:08 > > >> > > >> I reverted the version as what it was before (1.1), I haven't seen we > > >>released it in a standard way with this version, now I wonder: > > >> A- Have we got the Jenkins build for Squiggly ?B- Why a maven released > > >>versions (1.0 and 1.1) hasn't been publish yet ? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > Subject: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / > > >>Package RSLs and deploy with Maven > > >> > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:11:06 +0000 > > >> > > > >> > Ok, just pushed it. > > >> > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / > > >>Package RSLs and deploy with Maven > > >> > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:39:15 +0000 > > >> > > > > >> > > @Alex, Thanks > > >> > > @Chris, any thoughts on that: > > >> > > In maven.xml, the next version is 1.1 (<property name="version" > > >>value="1.1"/>), is it wise given 1.0-snapshot hasn't been released yet ? > > >> > > > > >> > > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > > >> > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / > > >>Package RSLs and deploy with Maven > > >> > > > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:23:50 +0000 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > OK, added. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 11/17/14, 4:01 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Squiggly as Components is not set yet, I selected "Runtime Shared > > >> > > > >Libraries".If someone as the Karma and the time to set > > >>"Squiggly" as > > >> > > > >Components, I'll change it. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:59:33 +0000 > > >> > > > >> From: j...@apache.org > > >> > > > >> To: iss...@flex.apache.org > > >> > > > >> Subject: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / > > >>Package > > >> > > > >>RSLs and deploy with Maven > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> Frédéric THOMAS created FLEX-34640: > > >> > > > >> -------------------------------------- > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> Summary: Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and > > >>deploy with > > >> > > > >>Maven > > >> > > > >> Key: FLEX-34640 > > >> > > > >> URL: > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34640 > > >> > > > >> Project: Apache Flex > > >> > > > >> Issue Type: Improvement > > >> > > > >> Components: Runtime Shared Libraries > > >> > > > >> Reporter: Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> Assignee: Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> Priority: Minor > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> Squiggly should come with RSLs > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> -- > > >> > > > >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > >> > > > >> (v6.3.4#6332) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
