.@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : jeudi 20 mars 2014 01:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Good news! The fix works and ILOG Elixir components are usable with Flex
4.13 without any errors now. This is a huge deal!
Works with 4.6. Broken w
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 20 mars 2014 01:48
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Hi,
> I think my manager (who is regularly reading the dev ML) is getting a
> little bit stressed (to say the least) about my ability to
actually been going on besides the Steve Jobs narrative. :)
David
-Original Message-
From: OmPrakash Muppirala
To: "dev@flex.apache.org"
Sent: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think my manager (who is regularly reading the dev ML) is getting a
> little bit stressed (to say the least)
> > about my ability to deliver on my daily job (the one I am paid for ;-) ).
> You need to keep you day job :-)
>
>
And
Hi,
> I think my manager (who is regularly reading the dev ML) is getting a little
> bit stressed (to say the least)
> about my ability to deliver on my daily job (the one I am paid for ;-) ).
You need to keep you day job :-)
> So regarding the 4.12.1, I will put a limit on the amount of time I
nt of time I can
> spend on it, and then give it back to Justin if it takes too long.
> Sorry about that, but I can't promise what I can't do.
>
> Maurice
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 20
#x27;t do.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 16:41
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On 3/19/14 8:35 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>Wait a minute, I only said I was willing to
On 3/19/14 8:35 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>Wait a minute, I only said I was willing to try for 4.12.1, and with help
>from Justin.
>
>Depending on how difficult the experience will be , I may or not agree to
>do it on further (minor) releases.
Yes, I know. You are under no obligation to be
credi 19 mars 2014 16:26
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On 3/19/14 7:40 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>>It could just be that we neutered hasValidLicense incorrectly and
>>should have had it return false instead of true.
>That&#x
On 3/19/14 7:40 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>>It could just be that we neutered hasValidLicense incorrectly and should
>>have had it return false instead of true.
>That's what I think too. The name is misleading.
>
>I propose to wait for confirmation that the updated compiler does not
>show
flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On 3/19/14 6:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>There is something that disturbs me in what you said:
>
>Since Adobe has donated Flex and the compiler to Apache, but still own
>Flash Builder, I find it strange that they
On 3/19/14 6:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>There is something that disturbs me in what you said:
>
>Since Adobe has donated Flex and the compiler to Apache, but still own
>Flash Builder,
>I find it strange that they would still rely on some hidden feature in
>the compiler to check the licen
In Flex 2.0 and 2.0.1, you needed Flex Builder in order to have the proper
Java libraries(Jars), or that function/argument failed. The JARS were
floating around the internet and were pretty easy to find, but it still
required additional work.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
On 19/03/14 13:54, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
If you didn't have FB installed and
were compiling it from the command-line, you couldn't use the charting
components at all.
Isn't that what the -licence mxmlc argument was for ?
Tom
n.
>
> WDYT?
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:37
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
>
> Good question. Maybe someone in the community can help out.
>
> O
?
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Good question. Maybe someone in the community can help out.
On 3/19/14 6:16 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>I have
ge d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:11
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
>
>
>
>On 3/19/14 12:25 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>wrote:
>>
>>But since there is no more
I have a premium licence of FB.
How could I test the stuff you are talking about (WSDL to data class stuff,
profiling)?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:11
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG
On 3/19/14 12:25 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
>But since there is no more [RequiresLicence( id="mx.fbpro" ) ] in the
>source, then maybe we could just remove the test, and execute the "third
>party" path in all cases.
>
>WDYT?
It isn't clear to me that FB doesn't have some way of executing th
:08
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On Mar 19, 2014 12:56 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
> So I did the change in CompilerAPI.java ( removed hasValidLicence) and
now both the compiler and the runtime error disappeared.
> Commit ?
+1
I will give it a
Maurice
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 08:25
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
>
> Yes, I understand.
> From the code path, hasValidLicence
e.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Yes, I understand.
>From the code path, hasValidLicence(licenceMap, id) checks whether the current
>licenceReq id applies to FlexSDK ("mx.fbpro") , and if not, considers this
>is a third-party licence and adds the dependencies (among
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 04:26
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
The compiler code looks like it has a code path where it gets information from
somewhere and auto-injects a class into
-Message d'origine-
>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:22
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
>
>I have added one line in the main program, to force the class to be
>included, and the err
rice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
I imported the project and run it with SDK 4.9, got the error
ReferenceError: Error #1065: La variable LicenseHandler n'est pas définie.
So I can have a look now.
Maurice
-Me
Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:20
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Right now the code returns true and looks like it bypasses inserting the
vendors license checker.
On 3/18/14 5:03 PM, "Om
r.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
I imported the project and run it with SDK 4.9, got the error
ReferenceError: Error #1065: La variable LicenseHandler n'est pas définie.
So I can have a look now.
Maurice
-Message
Right now the code returns true and looks like it bypasses inserting the
vendors license checker.
On 3/18/14 5:03 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >CompilerAPI.java some
ala
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 00:52
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility
On Mar 18, 2014 4:45 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
> It really seems that the code is operational.
> RequiresLicense meta is also in the constants:
>
> StandardDefs.jav
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
> > // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
> >license.
> >
> >Perhaps some code was removed as well?
> Yes, in
@classsoftware.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 23:46
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
>
> Hi,
>
> CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
> // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
license.
>
> Perhaps some code was removed as well?
>
> Justin
On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
> // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
>license.
>
>Perhaps some code was removed as well?
Yes, in hasValidLicense().
It looks like hasValidLicense is not correct and shou
]
Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 23:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility
Hi,
CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
// ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
license.
Perhaps some code was removed as well?
Justin
Very interesting.
I wondered what was the meaning of that strange error.
Thanks Om.
-Message d'origine-
De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 23:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : ILOG Elixr compatibility
I
Hi,
CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
// ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
license.
Perhaps some code was removed as well?
Justin
I saw a note in a recent thread that ILOG Elixr does not work with Apache
Flex 4.12. I was digging into it a bit and realized that there is an open
JIRA ticket here that might help fix the problem [1]
It has to do with the "RequiresLicense" metadata tag not working with
Apache Flex.
Anyone has a
36 matches
Mail list logo
