>It could just be that we neutered hasValidLicense incorrectly and should have >had it return false instead of true. That's what I think too. The name is misleading.
I propose to wait for confirmation that the updated compiler does not show errors on Exilir apps ( Om is going to test, I could ask Darren to test too) and if it is OK, leave it that way. If anything goes wrong later , we could easily add the "mx.fbpro" check. WDYT? Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 15:36 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility On 3/19/14 6:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >There is something that disturbs me in what you said: > >Since Adobe has donated Flex and the compiler to Apache, but still own >Flash Builder, I find it strange that they would still rely on some >hidden feature in the compiler to check the license of the software >that they still own. > >WDYT? You could be right. It could just be that we neutered hasValidLicense incorrectly and should have had it return false instead of true. I thought the WSDL to data class support included code from a swc, but maybe that feature is blocked higher up in the tool. -Alex
