There is something that disturbs me in what you said: Since Adobe has donated Flex and the compiler to Apache, but still own Flash Builder, I find it strange that they would still rely on some hidden feature in the compiler to check the license of the software that they still own.
WDYT? -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 14:37 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility Good question. Maybe someone in the community can help out. On 3/19/14 6:16 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >I have a premium licence of FB. > >How could I test the stuff you are talking about (WSDL to data class >stuff, profiling)? > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars >2014 14:11 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility > > > >On 3/19/14 12:25 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> >wrote: >> >>But since there is no more [RequiresLicence( id="mx.fbpro" ) ] in the >>source, then maybe we could just remove the test, and execute the >>"third party" path in all cases. >> >>WDYT? >It isn't clear to me that FB doesn't have some way of executing this >path for some other feature that is part of Premium that isn't in the >code, like the WSDL to data class stuff, profiling, etc. But if that's >all working, then yes, that's the right change. > >-Alex >
