So I did the change in CompilerAPI.java ( removed hasValidLicence) and now both the compiler and the runtime error disappeared. Commit ?
Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 08:25 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility Yes, I understand. >From the code path, hasValidLicence(licenceMap, id) checks whether the current >licenceReq id applies to FlexSDK ("mx.fbpro") , and if not, considers this >is a third-party licence and adds the dependencies (among other things). The name is misleading, it should be isFlexSDKLicence instead of hasValidLicence (I think that's why it was broken ). But since there is no more [RequiresLicence( id="mx.fbpro" ) ] in the source, then maybe we could just remove the test, and execute the "third party" path in all cases. WDYT? Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 04:26 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility The compiler code looks like it has a code path where it gets information from somewhere and auto-injects a class into the SWF so folks don't have to bother adding classes like that. But when we donated the code to Apache we tried to neuter the FB standard/premium check and broke this code path. I have made a suggestion for fixing. Don't now if it will work or not. -Alex On 3/18/14 5:57 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >That would mean adding: > >private var dep: com.ibm.ilog.elixir.utils::LicenseHandler; > >in the main application... > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:22 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility > >I have added one line in the main program, to force the class to be >included, and the error disappeared. > >private var lh: LicenseHandler; > >Could you try the same with your licenced version of Elixir ? > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:14 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility > >I imported the project and run it with SDK 4.9, got the error >ReferenceError: Error #1065: La variable LicenseHandler n'est pas définie. > >So I can have a look now. > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de >OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 00:52 À : >dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibility > >On Mar 18, 2014 4:45 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" ><maurice.amsel...@systar.com> >wrote: >> >> It really seems that the code is operational. >> RequiresLicense meta is also in the constants: >> >> StandardDefs.java: >> public static final String MD_REQUIRESLICENSE = >> "RequiresLicense"; >> >> BTW, I tried reproducing the issue, so I downloaded a trial version >> of >Elixir 3.5, and built a 10 lines app displaying a Calendar, with SDK 4.9. >> And I had no issues: >> The calendar appears correctly (with Trial Version watermark). >> >> What's wrong ? is it that the trial version has no licence management ? >> > >Yes, that is correct. I have a licensed version that I tried with. I >can repro this issue. > >Are you able to repro with the test case attached to the JIRA ticket? > >Thanks, >Om > >> Maurice >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : mardi >> 18 mars 2014 23:46 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr >> compatibility >> >> Hi, >> >> CompilerAPI.java someone added this: >> // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no >> longer a >license. >> >> Perhaps some code was removed as well? >> >> Justin
