sing the SYSTEM user ... I think I recal that users "home"
directory being at "C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile"
Chris
Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. April 2014 01:59
An: dev
OK. Flex-sdk and flex-tlf pass. I ran out of time working on flex-falcon.
Will pick it up in about 9 hours.
Feel free to hack away in-between. What do we have to do to make Jenkins
a public url?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/21/14 5:18 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 4/21/14 4:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppir
On 4/21/14 4:59 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>The job needs to run on a slave instance (same machine is fine) to have
>access to the windowing system.
>
>More importantly, Jenkins running as a service will not be able access the
>display. The slave needs to be configured to start via JNLP
On Apr 21, 2014 2:39 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2014 1:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> >
> > Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
> > flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
> > display but that's not helping.
>
On Apr 21, 2014 1:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
> flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
> display but that's not helping.
>
> Is there something else I need to do?
The job needs to run on a sl
Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch
flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the
display but that's not helping.
Is there something else I need to do?
-Alex
On 4/20/14 11:22 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi Erik, Om,
>
>I actually spent m
ny sponsoring a vm and
>>using
>> that to influence votes ... well I guess it was a little paranoid, but a
>> valid thought)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com ]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 21.
e paranoid, but a
> valid thought)
>
> Chris
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com ]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. April 2014 08:22
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Build Servers
>
> Hi Erik, Om,
>
> I actually spent m
I don't know if you can Sysprep a virtual OS your remoting into...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 2:46 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build Servers
On Sun, Apr 20,
icht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. April 2014 08:22
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Build Servers
Hi Erik, Om,
I actually spent my evenings this weekend trying to set it up. Figured I'd
learn something about Jenkins and Azure in the process.
I'll post
Hi Erik, Om,
I actually spent my evenings this weekend trying to set it up. Figured
I'd learn something about Jenkins and Azure in the process.
I'll post the info on private@ and we should just send emails when/if you
guys have time to spend on it. I'll be poking at it for another 40
minutes or
OK, will ask. I'll be highly surprised if it an issue. I think if it
were up to Roy there wouldn't be any builds.a.o.
-Alex
On 4/20/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Are we sure it''s OK to serve nightlies off non ASF machines? May want to
>confirm before putting time and effort into
Let's not make every discussion on this list about bylaws and regulations.
If I find time, I'll build the VM and finally get the CI nightmare that
Apache itself provides behind me. If the lawyers decide that the Apache
servers are better than the VM (lol) then we won't serve nightlies from the
VM,
Hi,
Are we sure it''s OK to serve nightlies off non ASF machines? May want to
confirm before putting time and effort into this.
Justin
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'.
>
> Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your plan
> to add more Mustella nodes...
>
>
Great. Can you make sure that the VMs are clone-able? You might have to
cr
Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'.
Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your plan
to add more Mustella nodes...
EdB
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> >
On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI VM.
> "All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the VM,
> after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds.
>
> Free from 'build
Alex,
I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI VM.
"All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the VM,
after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds.
Free from 'builds@a.o', free at last!
EdB
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:56 AM,
Welcome to my frustration ;-)
I'm probably naive, but I think our VMs are pretty secure. We're running on
Azure, we are fully patched on all the software we use (Win2008, Apache
Server, Java, Jenkins and the various players) and we expose a minimal
attach surface (ports, access controls etc.). I'd
After seeing this latest run of failures, does anybody still want to rely
on build.a.o for anything?
If anything, we should ask builds@ to email their list when they do
critical security upgrades so we can try to keep up on our build machine.
I think there's a chance that a multi-project server is
HI,
> Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing official
> nightly dev builds?
+1 We can resonably trust infra machines to be secure and that non one has
fiddled with the nightly builds. Our own set up machines are likely to be less
secure and there's a small risk that somet
gt; >> >>to do
> >> >> >> >all build tasks whenever needed. And with the "free credits" that
> >> >>come
> >> >> >> >with
> >> >> >> >the committer MSDN licences you can run a "medium" insta
t;>about
>> >> >>1.5
>> >> >> >months every month ;-)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >EdB
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
&g
ot;OmPrakash Muppirala"
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a
> >> >&g
gt;> >> >
> >> >> >EdB
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Alex Harui
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >
providing official
>nightly dev builds? If we take care of running checkintests on the VMs,
>then we can do the builds on Linux as well, right? Then we wont need to
>restrict our jobs on Windows slaves which seem to have the most problems
>on
>ASF build servers.
IMO, we don&#x
rote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> How much would it cost me to use my Azure VM instead of the Apache
>> >>build
>> >> >> server?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 4/17/14 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
>> >
Makes our lives so much
easier.
Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing official
nightly dev builds? If we take care of running checkintests on the VMs,
then we can do the builds on Linux as well, right? Then we wont need to
restrict our jobs on Windows slaves which seem to hav
t; server?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/17/14 11:39 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
gt;> >> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a
>> >>flex-only CI
>> >> >> server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >One disadvantage is that with Azure VM, we tend
; >
>> >> >> I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a
>> >>flex-only CI
>> >> >> server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >One disadvantage is that wi
ex-only CI
> >> >> server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >One disadvantage is that with Azure VM, we tend to run out of free
> >>credits
> >> >around the 20th of each month. Erik usually avoids
onth. Erik usually avoids this by switching
>>from
>> >Large to Medium on a particular date every month. A medium sized
>>instance
>> >cannot run Mustella as fast as a Large instance.
>> >
>> >My plan is to:
>> >
>> >Use Apache's
with Azure VM, we tend to run out of free credits
> >around the 20th of each month. Erik usually avoids this by switching from
> >Large to Medium on a particular date every month. A medium sized instance
> >cannot run Mustella as fast as a Large instance.
> >
> >My pla
usually avoids this by switching from
> >Large to Medium on a particular date every month. A medium sized instance
> >cannot run Mustella as fast as a Large instance.
> >
> >My plan is to:
> >
> >Use Apache's build servers to -
> >
> >1. Run sd
>cannot run Mustella as fast as a Large instance.
>
>My plan is to:
>
>Use Apache's build servers to -
>
>1. Run sdk build for every checkin
>2. Create release artifacts
>
>Use Azure VMs to -
>1. Run Mustella tests
>2. Build a network of slaves to run Must
Erik usually avoids this by switching from
Large to Medium on a particular date every month. A medium sized instance
cannot run Mustella as fast as a Large instance.
My plan is to:
Use Apache's build servers to -
1. Run sdk build for every checkin
2. Create release artifacts
Use Azure
I guess my question is: what are the tradeoffs of getting a flex-only CI
server on my Azure VM vs relying on Apache?
At Apache, we keep seeing other projects have build issues and require
configuration changes that block us. And as Om just pointed out, once
Infra has some other fire to fight, we
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I was talking to some of the people at a.o. infra on IRC and they mentioned
> that they have a new Windows VM that they launched for CI services... They
> are looking for people to help them test it out and get it setup. Do we
> hav
I was talking to some of the people at a.o. infra on IRC and they mentioned
that they have a new Windows VM that they launched for CI services... They
are looking for people to help them test it out and get it setup. Do we
have any interest in that? They would like to get this setup to help with
40 matches
Mail list logo
