Hi Erik, Om, I actually spent my evenings this weekend trying to set it up. Figured I'd learn something about Jenkins and Azure in the process.
I'll post the info on private@ and we should just send emails when/if you guys have time to spend on it. I'll be poking at it for another 40 minutes or so this evening. Feel free to change just about anything. Thanks, -Alex On 4/20/14 11:46 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >wrote: > >> Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'. >> >> Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your >>plan >> to add more Mustella nodes... >> >> >Great. Can you make sure that the VMs are clone-able? You might have to >create a fully working system, stop it, do a sysprep and create a clone >before use that. It is a little bit of upfront work, but makes it so much >easier to bring new systems online and get them working off the bat. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> EdB >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> <bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> > On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> > > >> > > Alex, >> > > >> > > I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI >> VM. >> > > "All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the >> VM, >> > > after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds. >> > > >> > > Free from 'builds@a.o', free at last! >> > > >> > > EdB >> > > >> > > >> > >> > What about Mustella? Our is this just for CI? >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>wrote: >> > > >> > > > After seeing this latest run of failures, does anybody still want >>to >> > rely >> > > > on build.a.o for anything? >> > > > >> > > > If anything, we should ask builds@ to email their list when they >>do >> > > > critical security upgrades so we can try to keep up on our build >> > machine. >> > > > I think there's a chance that a multi-project server is likely to >> have >> > a >> > > > huge pile of jars from all over the place which is more exposed >>than >> > the >> > > > few jars for our flex-only server. We just have to learn how to >> harden >> > it >> > > > at least as well as builds.a.o. Shouldn't that be possible? >> > > > >> > > > And I have to admit that I'm tempted to point the next version of >>the >> > > > installer out to our Flex CI server for its config or mirror the >> whole >> > > > site. We can't even modify our site right now. >> > > > >> > > > -Alex >> > > > >> > > > On 4/17/14 3:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >HI, >> > > > > >> > > > >> Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing >> > official >> > > > >> nightly dev builds? >> > > > >+1 We can resonably trust infra machines to be secure and that >>non >> > one >> > > > >has fiddled with the nightly builds. Our own set up machines are >> > likely >> > > > >to be less secure and there's a small risk that something bad >>could >> > > > >happen. >> > > > > >> > > > >Thanks, >> > > > >Justin >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Ix Multimedia Software >> > > >> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > > 3521 VB Utrecht >> > > >> > > T. 06-51952295 >> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>
