Actually all you have to do to allow the build agent service to access the desktop on windows machines, is to enable the checkbox on the "run as" tab (If you are using the SYSTEM user). If you are using a normal user, I think you don't have to do anything at all.
If you are using the SYSTEM user ... I think I recal that users "home" directory being at "C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile" Chris ________________________________________ Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. April 2014 01:59 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Build Servers On Apr 21, 2014 2:39 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 21, 2014 1:58 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > Well, the sdk build mostly completes but is now stuck trying to launch > > flash player. I think I set the Jenkins service to have access to the > > display but that's not helping. > > > > Is there something else I need to do? > > The job needs to run on a slave instance (same machine is fine) to have access to the windowing system. More importantly, Jenkins running as a service will not be able access the display. The slave needs to be configured to start via JNLP. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > -Alex > > > > On 4/20/14 11:22 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > >Hi Erik, Om, > > > > > >I actually spent my evenings this weekend trying to set it up. Figured > > >I'd learn something about Jenkins and Azure in the process. > > > > > >I'll post the info on private@ and we should just send emails when/if you > > >guys have time to spend on it. I'll be poking at it for another 40 > > >minutes or so this evening. > > > > > >Feel free to change just about anything. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >-Alex > > > > > >On 4/20/14 11:46 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >>> Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'. > > >>> > > >>> Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your > > >>>plan > > >>> to add more Mustella nodes... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Great. Can you make sure that the VMs are clone-able? You might have to > > >>create a fully working system, stop it, do a sysprep and create a clone > > >>before use that. It is a little bit of upfront work, but makes it so > > >>much > > >>easier to bring new systems online and get them working off the bat. > > >> > > >>Thanks, > > >>Om > > >> > > >> > > >>> EdB > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > >>> <bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Alex, > > >>> > > > > >>> > > I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the > > >>>CI > > >>> VM. > > >>> > > "All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up > > >>>the > > >>> VM, > > >>> > > after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Free from 'builds@a.o', free at last! > > >>> > > > > >>> > > EdB > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > What about Mustella? Our is this just for CI? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > >>>wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > After seeing this latest run of failures, does anybody still want > > >>>to > > >>> > rely > > >>> > > > on build.a.o for anything? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > If anything, we should ask builds@ to email their list when they > > >>>do > > >>> > > > critical security upgrades so we can try to keep up on our build > > >>> > machine. > > >>> > > > I think there's a chance that a multi-project server is likely to > > >>> have > > >>> > a > > >>> > > > huge pile of jars from all over the place which is more exposed > > >>>than > > >>> > the > > >>> > > > few jars for our flex-only server. We just have to learn how to > > >>> harden > > >>> > it > > >>> > > > at least as well as builds.a.o. Shouldn't that be possible? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > And I have to admit that I'm tempted to point the next version of > > >>>the > > >>> > > > installer out to our Flex CI server for its config or mirror the > > >>> whole > > >>> > > > site. We can't even modify our site right now. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > -Alex > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On 4/17/14 3:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >HI, > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Do we want to at least use the ASF build server for providing > > >>> > official > > >>> > > > >> nightly dev builds? > > >>> > > > >+1 We can resonably trust infra machines to be secure and that > > >>>non > > >>> > one > > >>> > > > >has fiddled with the nightly builds. Our own set up machines are > > >>> > likely > > >>> > > > >to be less secure and there's a small risk that something bad > > >>>could > > >>> > > > >happen. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > >Thanks, > > >>> > > > >Justin > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Ix Multimedia Software > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > >>> > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > >>> > > > > >>> > > T. 06-51952295 > > >>> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Ix Multimedia Software > > >>> > > >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > >>> 3521 VB Utrecht > > >>> > > >>> T. 06-51952295 > > >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > >>> > > > > >
