Hi,
> IMO, it is all under ALv2, so we can do what we want.
Probably not the case for all files, from a quick look via [1] see [2]
(copyright Adobe), [3] is MIT Licensed (along with 8 odd other files), [4] is
also MIT license (again along with 8 other files). I’ve not looked into any of
these
hris
>
>
>PS: He seems to be a fellow German guy, so I just contacted him directly.
>Let's see how it goes.
>
>
>Von: Justin Mclean
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 08:03:20
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS]
g, 7. Juli 2016 08:03:20
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
Hi,
> Look further up this thread, and you’ll see that Christophe said it’s fine.
> Roland dissociated himself from the code, and Mike? said fine as well. That’s
> pretty much the main co
Hi,
> Look further up this thread, and you’ll see that Christophe said it’s fine.
> Roland dissociated himself from the code, and Mike? said fine as well. That’s
> pretty much the main contributors with the exception of Jens Struwe.
Thanks, a summary of a long thread is always good.
Has anyone
Look further up this thread, and you’ll see that Christophe said it’s fine.
Roland dissociated himself from the code, and Mike? said fine as well. That’s
pretty much the main contributors with the exception of Jens Struwe.
On Jul 7, 2016, at 2:24 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the fir
Hi,
Has the first step been done? i.e.as discussed in etc first email of this
thread that is to contact contributors and see if they are OK if we fork this?
I can help out with assembling license and notice if needed.
Thanks,
Justin
once, I would probably start whistling a tune and
>> pretending not to have read your email [?]
>>
>>
>> And would Justin help me with this?
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________
>> Von: Alex Harui
>> Gesende
these modules at once, I would probably start whistling a tune and
>pretending not to have read your email [?]
>
>
>And would Justin help me with this?
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Alex Harui
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016 16:07:40
>A
modules at once, I
would probably start whistling a tune and pretending not to have read your
email [?]
And would Justin help me with this?
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016 16:07:40
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting
On 7/6/16, 5:47 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>That approach makes sense. We could put it in a “legacy” folder and bring
>in pieces as they seem needed or folks have time to sanitize the code —
>possibly with a different package structure.
Incrementally adopting AS3Commons is a fine approach as well. Wh
equired or asked by our users.
> In that case I would vote +1 ... if we should continue to maintain a huge
> pile of legacy functionality, I would vote -1.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Harbs
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016 14:24:29
> An:
would vote +1 ... if we should continue to maintain a huge pile of legacy
functionality, I would vote -1.
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2016 14:24:29
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I’d like to resurrect
t;> Von: Christophe Herreman
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 11:09
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>>
>> I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We
>> have n
pache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We
> have no data about usage but I suspect they are not used that much, if at
> all. I assume you'll get feedback from users when an
endet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 11:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We
have no data about usage but I suspect they are not used that much, if at
all. I assume you'
;
>
> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Alex Harui
> Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00)
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> I haven't looked at the code in detail, but
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I haven't looked at the code in detail, but if it is possible to have all
the logging libraries as external dependencies, it should be ok to accept
the AS3Co
that most
>is built with Flexmojos and I only gave up on non-maven stuff ;-)
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Christophe Herreman
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopti
t: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
Hi all,
sorry to jump in late here. I'm the original founder and one of the main
authors of AS3Commons and wanted to give some feedback on the things I read
here:
- renaming: I don&
helps keep the echo system a
> > little stronger.
> >
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lizhi [mailto:s...@qq.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopt
nt: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
> the flex should clear.
> if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a
...@qq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
the flex should clear.
if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a bug.
why put some
i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to flex?
the flex should clear.
if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a bug.
why put some lib in flex?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Adopting
components / methods.
xmlns:u="library://ns.apache.org/flex/utils"
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 12:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I'm not a fan of changing th
On 12/6/15, 2:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Christophe Herreman, who also happens to be on our PMC, and one of the
>> major contributors to AS3Commons, is interested in having Apache Flex
>> adopt the AS3Commons code. I think this would be a good move for Apache
>> Flex because we us
egrate it back if people are requesting it to
>>be
>> supported.
>>
>> I think after Adobe announced giving up on Flex about 80% of the
>> frameworks died and only a hand full of great ones survived. I'm not
>> planning on keeping zombies alive, that none need,
Hi,
> Christophe Herreman, who also happens to be on our PMC, and one of the
> major contributors to AS3Commons, is interested in having Apache Flex
> adopt the AS3Commons code. I think this would be a good move for Apache
> Flex because we use some of AS3Commons in the Installer already so it
>
____________
> Von: Alex Harui
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 06:25
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
>
> I'm not a fan of changing the package names. Already this week we heard
> folks wanting AMF because they
Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 06:25
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
I'm not a fan of changing the package names. Already this week we heard folks
wanting AMF because they don't want to change their backend, and I've heard
several folks wantin
apache.org>>
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
If someone will help me with that I'll do it. What I'm thinking is when you
0:26 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> > > > mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have
> > to
> > > > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options
g the ball on all non-maven things ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von
> OmPrakash Muppirala
> Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Dezember 2015 09:33
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISC
te after dropping the ball on all non-maven things ;-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von OmPrakash
Muppirala
Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Dezember 2015 09:33
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
Hey, you
o
> > > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
> > > >
> > > > -Mark
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, De
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS
o over options then.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
> &
wrote:
> Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have to
> reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
>
] Adopting AS3Commons
I'd either leave it as is: org.as3commons
Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons
Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons
Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons.as3
There is backward compatibility to be considered, so if we rename the
packages folks would ha
On 12/4/15, 5:05 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>+1
>
>Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
>
I'd either leave it as is: org.as3commons
Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons
Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons
Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons
+1
Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
-Mark
:)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2015 18:18
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
Hi,
It has been my understanding that any existing code base that gets stored in an
Apache Flex re
I use the async library in my feathers app right now. Some of the utilities
as well. The authors of all the librariues are top rate. :)
BTW, as3commons-asblocks, haha that was me that wrote all that! ;-)
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Nice find. Thanks, -Alex
>
> On
Nice find. Thanks, -Alex
On 12/3/15, 1:09 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>This seems to be confirmation:
>https://twitter.com/as3commons/status/185620600272855040
>
>It appears to be donated by the author, so I think we’re okay there.
>
>On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> I have heard that FZi
This seems to be confirmation:
https://twitter.com/as3commons/status/185620600272855040
It appears to be donated by the author, so I think we’re okay there.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I have heard that FZip moved to be included in AS3Commons, but I have no idea
> if that’s tru
I have heard that FZip moved to be included in AS3Commons, but I have no idea
if that’s true.
I assume Christophe should know the answer to that.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/3/15, 12:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> The feature I probably use most often in the zip
On 12/3/15, 12:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has
>the best zip library (formally FZip).
Do you know for a fact it uses Fzip? That could pose a problem since Fzip
isn't Apache-licensed. It wouldn't block adoption of the rest of the c
I use the AS3 Commons eventbus.
-Original Message-
From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:26 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the
best zip
Ah that's why the name is familiar. I used it in the Installer :-)
Thanks for the info!
Regards,
Om
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Harbs wrote:
> The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the
> best zip library (formally FZip).
>
> But there’s tons of helper fun
The feature I probably use most often in the zip functionality. It has the best
zip library (formally FZip).
But there’s tons of helper functions and containers as well.
Take a look here: https://github.com/AS3Commons
and here: https://code.google.com/p/as3-commons/source/browse/trunk
On Dec 3
Do we have a list of features or an URL we can look at?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Harbs wrote:
> +1.
>
> There’s lot’s useful stuff in AS3Commons.
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been my understanding that any existing code base that
+1.
There’s lot’s useful stuff in AS3Commons.
On Dec 3, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been my understanding that any existing code base that gets stored
> in an Apache Flex repo must be "donated" via the Apache Software Grant
> process, which essentially requires that th
Hi,
It has been my understanding that any existing code base that gets stored
in an Apache Flex repo must be "donated" via the Apache Software Grant
process, which essentially requires that the author of every line of code
in the code base needs to sign a legally-binding document.
I just found ou
52 matches
Mail list logo
