Since Flex was open sourced it's felt like to me it's stagnated. We had all
of these new components donated or proposed to be donated proposed to be
worked on and I haven't seen any of them. I think it's because it's in some
white board somewhere. I hate that. Put them in the main branch. Put it in.
Then we can see them in code completion. Then we can start getting bug
reports as their being used.

Put as3commons into our.main.branch.utils. If that's org.apache.utils then
fine. I also figure if someone is upgrading their SDK and we've renamed the
package then there is no conflict. They can remove the link to
as3commons.swc and all the API's will cause errors. Then they just go in
and use the new packages.


On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> IIRC most of the projects have some pretty thorough unit tests as well.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:14 PM, jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for renaming it. make it part of the main package. that way we have to
> > commit to it. if we put it off to the side there's more "it's a side
> > project. we don't need to maintain it."
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> > mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote:
> >
> > > Good point, we should keep it the same then.  However if we do have to
> > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons
> > >
> > >
> > > I'd either leave it as is:  org.as3commons
> > > Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons
> > > Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons
> > > Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons.as3
> > >
> > > There is backward compatibility to be considered, so if we rename the
> > > packages folks would have to change their source code to use it, so I'd
> > > probably lean towards leaving it as is.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to