I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We have no data about usage but I suspect they are not used that much, if at all. I assume you'll get feedback from users when an integration is missing in which case it can still be added.
- Christophe 2016-02-11 7:58 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > But if we don't have the libs, a can't compile the optional code. We > wouldn't require users to have them, but in order to build the lib, we > would need them ... That's the problem. > > Chris > > > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons > > I haven't looked at the code in detail, but if it is possible to have all > the logging libraries as external dependencies, it should be ok to accept > the AS3Commons Logging project, if at least a few of them have compatible > licenses. > > Let's see where the revival of this discussion takes us. Maybe we'll > start a vote next week. > > -Alex > > On 2/10/16, 3:54 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >Hi Christophe, > > > >I already had a detailed look at as3commons and what I found out is that > >quite some of the dependencies (especially in the logging part) come from > >projects that seem to have been given up. At least I couldn't find a > >single source for those libraries. I also bet that we wouldn't need to > >keep support for all of them. I think the logging module was one that I > >was having most trouble with. > > > >If we were to continue as3commons, I think we should strip out code like > >that. I wouldn't throw it away, but sort of save it somewhere until > >someone asks for it and reactivate the code by providing optional modules > >for each of these frameworks. > > > >I would be glad to help with this after all I was happy to see that most > >is built with Flexmojos and I only gave up on non-maven stuff ;-) > > > >Chris > > > >________________________________________ > >Von: Christophe Herreman <christophe.herre...@gmail.com> > >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56 > >An: dev@flex.apache.org > >Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons > > > >Hi all, > > > >sorry to jump in late here. I'm the original founder and one of the main > >authors of AS3Commons and wanted to give some feedback on the things I > >read > >here: > > > >- renaming: I don't have an issue with this but not sure what the gain is > >here, apart from a more consistent and integrated feel with the SDK (which > >could be the most important argument). Keep in mind that most of the > >libraries are not Flex libraries, but rather ActionScript 3 libraries, > >hence the name of the project. Flex related code is in separate libs > >(Async > >and Async-Flex) for instance. > > > >- FZip was indeed donated by Claus Wahlers to AS3Commons. > > > >- The Logging library has support for many other logging libraries and > >targets, hence the many (optional) dependencies. > > > >- AS3Commons grew out of Spring ActionScript (SAS). This means that SAS > >has > >a lot of dependencies on AS3Commons. Perhaps that is something to take > >into > >account if you are thinking about renaming or refactoring the packages. > > > >- the domain name as3commons.org (and springactionscript.org) is about to > >expire and I'll extend it. There is currently nothing behind these > >domains. > >I don't have the time to put up nor maintain a site here. Any suggestions > >what we could do here? > > > >regards, > >Christophe > > > >2015-12-09 13:40 GMT+01:00 Dev LFM <developer...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Personally I've never used as3commons, but its ok for me.. > >> > >> I would also like to see all the experimental stuff that Ted Patrick > >> donated that is already in the sdk but not official.. > >> > >> 2015-12-08 10:58 GMT+00:00 Kessler CTR Mark J > >><mark.kessler....@usmc.mil>: > >> > >> > We are talking about adopting the source. It makes sense to bring > >>over > >> > ActionScript utilities that people still actively use. Even when they > >> stop > >> > being supported in their current site. It helps keep the echo system > >>a > >> > little stronger. > >> > > >> > > >> > -Mark > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: lizhi [mailto:s...@qq.com] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons > >> > > >> > i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to > flex? > >> > the flex should clear. > >> > if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a bug. > >> > why put some lib in flex? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > View this message in context: > >> > > >> > >> > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Adopting-AS3 > >>Commons-tp50473p50546.html > >> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > >>Nabble.com. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Christophe Herreman > >http://www.herrodius.com > >http://www.springactionscript.org > >http://www.as3commons.org > > -- Christophe Herreman http://www.herrodius.com http://www.springactionscript.org http://www.as3commons.org
