I’d like to resurrect this discussion. It kind of fizzled out without a resolution.
What’s bringing this back up, is I need to implement compression and decompression of BinaryData. I believe that FZip has the code necessary for that. (I may be wrong about that, though.) On Feb 11, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Christophe Herreman <christophe.herre...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I meant was that the logging integrations, not the logging library > itself, can be ignored IMO. Except for the Flex logger then. > > - Christophe > > 2016-02-11 11:29 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > >> Yeah ... would have liked to, but as you use your own dogfood, the loggin >> is used in the other modules, so actually it's quite essential to get the >> logging runing before we can even think to get the rest running. >> >> Chris >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: Christophe Herreman <christophe.herre...@gmail.com> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 11:09 >> An: dev@flex.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons >> >> I wouldn't care too much about all the logging framework integrations. We >> have no data about usage but I suspect they are not used that much, if at >> all. I assume you'll get feedback from users when an integration is missing >> in which case it can still be added. >> >> - Christophe >> >> 2016-02-11 7:58 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: >> >>> But if we don't have the libs, a can't compile the optional code. We >>> wouldn't require users to have them, but in order to build the lib, we >>> would need them ... That's the problem. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. >>> >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>> Datum: 10.02.2016 19:05 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons >>> >>> I haven't looked at the code in detail, but if it is possible to have all >>> the logging libraries as external dependencies, it should be ok to accept >>> the AS3Commons Logging project, if at least a few of them have compatible >>> licenses. >>> >>> Let's see where the revival of this discussion takes us. Maybe we'll >>> start a vote next week. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 2/10/16, 3:54 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Christophe, >>>> >>>> I already had a detailed look at as3commons and what I found out is that >>>> quite some of the dependencies (especially in the logging part) come >> from >>>> projects that seem to have been given up. At least I couldn't find a >>>> single source for those libraries. I also bet that we wouldn't need to >>>> keep support for all of them. I think the logging module was one that I >>>> was having most trouble with. >>>> >>>> If we were to continue as3commons, I think we should strip out code like >>>> that. I wouldn't throw it away, but sort of save it somewhere until >>>> someone asks for it and reactivate the code by providing optional >> modules >>>> for each of these frameworks. >>>> >>>> I would be glad to help with this after all I was happy to see that most >>>> is built with Flexmojos and I only gave up on non-maven stuff ;-) >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> Von: Christophe Herreman <christophe.herre...@gmail.com> >>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 10:56 >>>> An: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> Betreff: Re: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> sorry to jump in late here. I'm the original founder and one of the main >>>> authors of AS3Commons and wanted to give some feedback on the things I >>>> read >>>> here: >>>> >>>> - renaming: I don't have an issue with this but not sure what the gain >> is >>>> here, apart from a more consistent and integrated feel with the SDK >> (which >>>> could be the most important argument). Keep in mind that most of the >>>> libraries are not Flex libraries, but rather ActionScript 3 libraries, >>>> hence the name of the project. Flex related code is in separate libs >>>> (Async >>>> and Async-Flex) for instance. >>>> >>>> - FZip was indeed donated by Claus Wahlers to AS3Commons. >>>> >>>> - The Logging library has support for many other logging libraries and >>>> targets, hence the many (optional) dependencies. >>>> >>>> - AS3Commons grew out of Spring ActionScript (SAS). This means that SAS >>>> has >>>> a lot of dependencies on AS3Commons. Perhaps that is something to take >>>> into >>>> account if you are thinking about renaming or refactoring the packages. >>>> >>>> - the domain name as3commons.org (and springactionscript.org) is about >> to >>>> expire and I'll extend it. There is currently nothing behind these >>>> domains. >>>> I don't have the time to put up nor maintain a site here. Any >> suggestions >>>> what we could do here? >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Christophe >>>> >>>> 2015-12-09 13:40 GMT+01:00 Dev LFM <developer...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Personally I've never used as3commons, but its ok for me.. >>>>> >>>>> I would also like to see all the experimental stuff that Ted Patrick >>>>> donated that is already in the sdk but not official.. >>>>> >>>>> 2015-12-08 10:58 GMT+00:00 Kessler CTR Mark J >>>>> <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil>: >>>>> >>>>>> We are talking about adopting the source. It makes sense to bring >>>>> over >>>>>> ActionScript utilities that people still actively use. Even when >> they >>>>> stop >>>>>> being supported in their current site. It helps keep the echo >> system >>>>> a >>>>>> little stronger. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Mark >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: lizhi [mailto:s...@qq.com] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 2:15 AM >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons >>>>>> >>>>>> i thinks it is just a lib.it in the github is good.why put it to >>> flex? >>>>>> the flex should clear. >>>>>> if the flex can not use the lib from github,should fixed,it is a >> bug. >>>>>> why put some lib in flex? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Adopting-AS3 >>>>> Commons-tp50473p50546.html >>>>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christophe Herreman >>>> http://www.herrodius.com >>>> http://www.springactionscript.org >>>> http://www.as3commons.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Christophe Herreman >> http://www.herrodius.com >> http://www.springactionscript.org >> http://www.as3commons.org >> > > > > -- > Christophe Herreman > http://www.herrodius.com > http://www.springactionscript.org > http://www.as3commons.org
