On 8/8/15, 12:38 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>wrote:
>
>> Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
>>
>>
>Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
>-keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param descripti
On 8/8/15, 2:47 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> One of my goals for FlexJS is to leverage as much code in the browser as
>> possible. That’s why there are button components that thinly wrap the
>> HTML but
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> One of my goals for FlexJS is to leverage as much code in the browser as
> possible. That’s why there are button components that thinly wrap the
> HTML button element. You can pay-as-you-go and select heavier buttons
> that allow more complex
> Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
> -keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc.
>
> The fact you are not even getting an @export tag means something else is
> wrong somewhere. The export tag has to be there whether -keep-asdoc is tru
> or false, make sense
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
>
>
Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
-keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc.
The fact you are not even getting an @export tag m
Might just be broken. We can fix it eventually
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Sat, Aug 8, 2015 10:39 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Also, What to do to kee
Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
for:
/**
* addBead()
*
* @export
* @param {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} bead The bead to add.
*/
org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {};
/**
* getBeadByType()
*
* @export
* @param {Object} clas
> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
My bad, thanks.
> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
> remove it if we can.
Yep, @Erik, any hint ?
Still remain the start function def, should it be moved to an interface or
removed too ?
On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about to
>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based projects
>with 1 build conf.
>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
>
>For the
I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about to
implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based projects with
1 build conf.
Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I w
OK, updated it again. GCL didn’t use to change that often, but these days
it is changing multiple times a day. Om has already changed the scripts
to bundle GCL so the next nightly builds and future releases won’t be
caught by GCL changes. I haven’t cut a new nightly yet as I am still
hoping to f
Thanks Alex,
but I just tested and they changed it once again.
I'm in vacation period and get to a laptop several hours later.
I think the current changes in GCL makes the installer not operative since
people wanting to try FlexJS from Installer should get this wall. And
nobody should be having the
12 matches
Mail list logo
