> Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
> -keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc.
>
> The fact you are not even getting an @export tag means something else is
> wrong somewhere. The export tag has to be there whether -keep-asdoc is tru
> or false, make sense?
Yes, make sense but it isn't there, I've got only @type and @interface
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:38:07 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
>>
>>
> Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
> -keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc.
>
> The fact you are not even getting an @export tag means something else is
> wrong somewhere. The export tag has to be there whether -keep-asdoc is tru
> or false, make sense?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>> for:
>>
>> /**
>> * addBead()
>> *
>> * @export
>> * @param {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} bead The bead to add.
>> */
>> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {};
>>
>>
>> /**
>> * getBeadByType()
>> *
>> * @export
>> * @param {Object} classOrInterface The type of bead to look for.
>> * @return {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} The bead.
>> */
>> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
>> function(classOrInterface) {};
>>
>> I get:
>>
>> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
>> };
>> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
>> function(classOrInterface) {
>>
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>>> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:33:42 +0100
>>>
>>>> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
>>>
>>> My bad, thanks.
>>>
>>>> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>>>> remove it if we can.
>>>
>>> Yep, @Erik, any hint ?
>>>
>>> Still remain the start function def, should it be moved to an interface
>> or removed too ?
>>>
>>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>>>> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:27:53 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about
>> to
>>>>>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based
>> projects
>>>>>with 1 build conf.
>>>>>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>>For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I will have a
>>>>>lot of questions, the 2 first ones:
>>>>>
>>>>>1- If I'm not wrong, sprite.js can't have an AS counterpart, this one
>>>>>needs to stay JS only but it includes a "start" method definition, not
>>>>>having this methos in the AS part, I won't be able to use it, should
>> this
>>>>>definition be moved to an interface in asjs and be shared by both sides
>> ?
>>>>
>>>> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>>>> remove it if we can.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>2- Classes and Interfaces are written this way in JS:
>>>>>
>>>>>org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO ={ names: [{
>>>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org.apache.flex.core.IStrand' }] };
>>>>>
>>>>>But if I cross compile IStrand.as, I get:
>>>>>
>>>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
>>>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>>>>>
>>>>>Why we still have the underscores ?
>>>>
>>>> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
