On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about to
>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based projects
>with 1 build conf.
>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
>
>For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I will have a
>lot of questions, the 2 first ones:
>
>1- If I'm not wrong, sprite.js can't have an AS counterpart, this one
>needs to stay JS only but it includes a "start" method definition, not
>having this methos in the AS part, I won't be able to use it, should this
>definition be moved to an interface in asjs and be shared by both sides ?
I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
remove it if we can.
>
>2- Classes and Interfaces are written this way in JS:
>
>org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO ={ names: [{
>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org.apache.flex.core.IStrand' }] };
>
>But if I cross compile IStrand.as, I get:
>
>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>
>Why we still have the underscores ?
We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
-Alex
