Might just be broken. We can fix it eventually
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
------ Original message------
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Sat, Aug 8, 2015 10:39 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
for:
/**
* addBead()
*
* @export
* @param {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} bead The bead to add.
*/
org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {};
/**
* getBeadByType()
*
* @export
* @param {Object} classOrInterface The type of bead to look for.
* @return {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} The bead.
*/
org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
function(classOrInterface) {};
I get:
org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
};
org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
function(classOrInterface) {
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:33:42 +0100
>
>> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
>
> My bad, thanks.
>
>> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>> remove it if we can.
>
> Yep, @Erik, any hint ?
>
> Still remain the start function def, should it be moved to an interface or
> removed too ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:27:53 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about to
>>>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based projects
>>>with 1 build conf.
>>>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
>>>
>>>For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I will have a
>>>lot of questions, the 2 first ones:
>>>
>>>1- If I'm not wrong, sprite.js can't have an AS counterpart, this one
>>>needs to stay JS only but it includes a "start" method definition, not
>>>having this methos in the AS part, I won't be able to use it, should this
>>>definition be moved to an interface in asjs and be shared by both sides ?
>>
>> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>> remove it if we can.
>>
>>>
>>>2- Classes and Interfaces are written this way in JS:
>>>
>>>org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO ={ names: [{
>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org.apache.flex.core.IStrand' }] };
>>>
>>>But if I cross compile IStrand.as, I get:
>>>
>>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
>>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>>>
>>>Why we still have the underscores ?
>>
>> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
