On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Also, What to do to keep as doc, I've been trying -keep-asdoc but
>
>
Fred, I looked at the code quickly, this should work right now and
-keep-asdoc is ONLY for the @param description etc.
The fact you are not even getting an @export tag means something else is
wrong somewhere. The export tag has to be there whether -keep-asdoc is tru
or false, make sense?
Mike
> for:
>
> /**
> * addBead()
> *
> * @export
> * @param {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} bead The bead to add.
> */
> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {};
>
>
> /**
> * getBeadByType()
> *
> * @export
> * @param {Object} classOrInterface The type of bead to look for.
> * @return {org.apache.flex.core.IBead} The bead.
> */
> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
> function(classOrInterface) {};
>
> I get:
>
> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.addBead = function(bead) {
> };
> org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.getBeadByType =
> function(classOrInterface) {
>
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:33:42 +0100
> >
> >> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
> >
> > My bad, thanks.
> >
> >> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
> >> remove it if we can.
> >
> > Yep, @Erik, any hint ?
> >
> > Still remain the start function def, should it be moved to an interface
> or removed too ?
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
> >> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:27:53 +0000
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm about
> to
> >>>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based
> projects
> >>>with 1 build conf.
> >>>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
> >>>
> >>>For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I will have a
> >>>lot of questions, the 2 first ones:
> >>>
> >>>1- If I'm not wrong, sprite.js can't have an AS counterpart, this one
> >>>needs to stay JS only but it includes a "start" method definition, not
> >>>having this methos in the AS part, I won't be able to use it, should
> this
> >>>definition be moved to an interface in asjs and be shared by both sides
> ?
> >>
> >> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
> >> remove it if we can.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>2- Classes and Interfaces are written this way in JS:
> >>>
> >>>org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO ={ names: [{
> >>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org.apache.flex.core.IStrand' }] };
> >>>
> >>>But if I cross compile IStrand.as, I get:
> >>>
> >>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{
> >>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
> >>>
> >>>Why we still have the underscores ?
> >>
> >> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon repo.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >
>
>
