Welcome on board Josh!
Good luck! :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Please-welcome-Josh-Tynjala-as-Apache-Flex-Committer-tp46618p46620.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailin
On 5/15/15, 5:13 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I
>>know
>> it's a catalyst for me because I met you back in 2005-2006(can't
>>remember),
>> right when AIR(Apollo
The Apache Flex Project Management Committee (PMC) is pleased to announce
our newest committer, Josh Tynjala.
Josh is currently well known for his work on Feathers [1], but recently
has contributed enough patches to the AntOnAir library we use in the
Apache Flex SDK Installer that we decided to of
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
> If I knew people like you were getting interested in these projects, I know
> it's a catalyst for me because I met you back in 2005-2006(can't remember),
> right when AIR(Apollo) was released at the Adobe component developer
> summit. I
Josh,
You ARE the reason I am on this list right now from 2 years away. Your
Feathers framework proves how well ActionScript "doesn't" get in the way of
making an app quick.
I was able in about 2 days to pick it up and get something going with my
audio stuff.
That said, Alex and Erik did a lo(mo
Why would someone pick ActionScript over TypeScript? I have ten years of
experience with ActionScript. If I were to switch away from Flash/AIR
today, I'd prefer to keep using the same language and focus on learning new
libraries (whether with a framework like FlexJS or lower-level DOM). It's
signif
Hmm, yeah ok that looks interesting.
I don't know as Alex said what is the benefit??? Who knows. :)
I know from mid 2012 to mid 2013 I did a huge amount of compiler work for
Apache and Randori, I know what AS can do going to JS, it was quite fun.
Mike went to quite a few conferences and from the
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
> > >compiler in the repo right no
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
> >compiler in the repo right now can do what you mentioned already.
>
> Josh’s idea is interesting. In both
On 5/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>FlexJS does massive more since it does CSS, MXML States etc. But that
>compiler in the repo right now can do what you mentioned already.
Josh’s idea is interesting. In both Randori and FlexJS, the transpiler is
buried in the package. I think
In short Randori was based on idea that the designer does its views in HTML /
CSS and the behavior (business logic) is implemented in another language (C++,
AS3, etc), the behavior was plugged into HTML via CSS, we had the full SDK,
tool chain, even being able to work via surface API with other
Yeah, you are correct on all accounts.
Summed up laymans, Mike had wrapped Guice IOC impl in ActionScript that
basically compiled over to Javascript.
The thing he never agreed with about FlexJS back in 2013 was the view.
Randori injected HTML templates and injected them into the DOM.
But... I wr
I had heard of Randori, but I remember visiting the website and being
unable to figure out what exactly it was from the description on the
homepage. All the language used was pretty dense with technical stuff and
hard for me to understand. Based on community tweets about it, I got the
vague idea th
And you can see;
https://github.com/RandoriAS/randori-libraries
We had a huge amount of shims for frameworks that "just worked" and
compiled to javascript.
Mike
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> @Josh We already had it. The Randori project and Randori compiler was a
>
@Josh We already had it. The Randori project and Randori compiler was a
straight transpiler.
See; https://github.com/RandoriAS/randori-compiler
Nice to see you in the conversation. :)
Mike
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> In my opinion, a separate product that is simply
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/15, 11:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
> wrote:
> >
> >What I want to do in the next couple months is test the crap out of all
> >the
> >base UI components and make sure they work, JUST WORK from as to in the
> >browser.
>
> That would b
In my opinion, a separate product that is simply an ActionScript to
JavaScript transpiler with direct access to browser APIs like the DOM would
be a smart idea. It would help establish the idea that ActionScript isn't
only for Flash and SWFs. Developers would see that ActionScript can be used
simil
On 5/15/15, 11:26 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>What I want to do in the next couple months is test the crap out of all
>the
>base UI components and make sure they work, JUST WORK from as to in the
>browser.
That would be awesome. Be prepared, you’ll find lots of issues.
>Well, that is my
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
>
> Overall, I think FlexJS is going in the right direction. We just need to
> keep at it and create a minimum viable product and keep making regular
> releases. By the time we are ready, I believe AngularJS and React would
> have prim
> Yeah, so I hope that Alexander or one of his folks will soon join this
> thread and help out. Maybe I’ll have to offer to buy a full license if
> they can help us get it working.
hug, I hope I made buy enough licenses from the companies I've been working
that you won't need to do that.
Frédér
Looking at the direction in which the major frameworks are moving towards,
it seems like FlexJS (or even Flex itself) has been the best approach all
along.
Google's AngularJS 2.0 is using Webcomponents to create MXML like
declarative components [1]. Facebook's React is using JSX to do the same
[2
> Fred, I didn't mean to contradict anything you said
I know, don't worry, it wasn't about that at all, but reading the 2 asnwers,
they look like a bit opposite, just because the context was different :-)
> I just know the 100's
> of hours you rput into the Randori plugin
And I'm pretty sure it
On 5/15/15, 11:31 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> I guess I am hoping there is one more scenario where we put the right
>> files and data in a FlexJS release that IntelliJ thinks it is a Flex SDK
>> without it actually being a Flex SDK. I don’t know what a Facet is or
>> what goes in a Randori
> I guess I am hoping there is one more scenario where we put the right
> files and data in a FlexJS release that IntelliJ thinks it is a Flex SDK
> without it actually being a Flex SDK. I don’t know what a Facet is or
> what goes in a Randori-lik plug-in, but I don’t think it was necessary for
>
That's just it, we live in a stereotypical world, where it's not fair but
it's the truth and we have to play that game.
IMHO, changing the name of something has no effect on the validity of the
technology. FlexJS will succeed because it solves a problem and solves it
well.
I really don't know why
On 5/15/15, 11:04 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>I know the whole open source mantra, but it would be nice to work on
>something that gets used by people. FlexJS is another question mark
>because
>on top of the technology transforming things and not just HTML/JS
>framework, you have to wipe the
Fred, I didn't mean to contradict anything you said. I just know the 100's
of hours you rput into the Randori plugin and I don't want to sound like I
am over stepping bounds on anything I say.
Honestly, I thought the whole Randori thing with IOC and it's easy
framework might actually get used, I h
I guess I am hoping there is one more scenario where we put the right
files and data in a FlexJS release that IntelliJ thinks it is a Flex SDK
without it actually being a Flex SDK. I don’t know what a Facet is or
what goes in a Randori-lik plug-in, but I don’t think it was necessary for
me to do t
Well, it seems the in last 2 answers (Mike and myself), there is a
contradiction, actually there is not, there are only few scenarios for IntelliJ
IMO
- We don't do anything particular and we use FlexJS as a lib on top of the Flex
SDK an we have a not user friendly setup as we've seen recently.
@Alex
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986
Been there, done that.
> BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
whole Randori-like plug in.
Considering how much time Fred etal put into that "project", I doubt there
is enough time to get even close to wh
> BTW, I would hope that better integration with IntelliJ doesn’t require a
> whole Randori-like plug in. Falcon should be able to swap in for MXMLC
> with fewer changes.
I could be wrong but if the name and location of the compiler and the API is
the same (to be sure, check the idea-flex-compil
> The discussion on this was in March 2013.
This is it, I think:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ArrayList-itemUpdateHandler-Change-td7774.html
It looks to me like the intention of the person who originally created the
new ArrayList (Michael A. Labriola) was for it to be tes
On 5/15/15, 9:03 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>It was a revert of the previous commit because I used IntelliJ the code
>cleanup function which touched all the files, the following commit
>59659f7cc66a20a9450d4a3117a5f999f1fa41c7 shows that only DebugCLI and
>Extensions was touched.
>
>In this
On 5/15/15, 8:54 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> Regarding the file location in FDB, I wasn’t sure you had time to work
>>on
>> it so I didn’t mention it. But if you have time that would be great.
>> IMO, it doesn’t require a JIRA issue to track it if you have the fix
>>ready.
>
>You can now d
> Git log for dcc404689eb20d5a037bbf67f4cbb85adec92237 shows that you
> changed FaultActions for FLEX-34062. I am able to copy 3 jars from the
> Flex SDK and run fdb, but others were getting some sort of mismatch, like
> some older version of DebugCLI.java was calling directly to FaultActions
sh Player Debugger) [build 20150515]
Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
(fdb) run
Waiting for Player to connect
Player connected; session starting.
Set breakpoints and then type 'continue' to resume the session.
(fdb) dir C:\Users\AsusFred\Downloads
Source d
These pass for me.
We’ve had this problem several times in the past on that machine. For some
reason the player gets in a funky state. Once I was able to fix it by moving
the player window, but I can’t reproduce the same problem on my computer.
-Alex
From: Tom Chiverton mailto:t...@extravisi
Fred,
Which classes in flex-falcon are interacting with FDB? I’m trying to
understand whether we can bundle FDB from the Flex SDK into FlexJS.
Git log for dcc404689eb20d5a037bbf67f4cbb85adec92237 shows that you
changed FaultActions for FLEX-34062. I am able to copy 3 jars from the
Flex SDK and r
Alex,
Btw, Just seen my commit message before to fix the worker but after my merge of
the donated code, FLEX-34291:
I kept the legacy code to evaluate expressions, the new code based on Falcon
classes will be created in the Falcon repository.
I re-applied previous fixes we had of FDB
So, it s
> I didn’t think there was a different debugger code base for Falcon.
That's a while, but IIRC and I can be wrong, it seems to me I had to remap some
classes onto the asc or compiler, can't exactly remember, I should look at the
git history and compare to be sure.
> I think Piotr and Kevin r
TeotiGraphix wrote
> Kevin, I am curious what are some of your motivations for trying out and
> testing FlexJS?
>
> Mike
Mike, thanks for asking, although you may regret the long boring answer.
Short answer: I have some guys at work with windows phones and tablets and I
would like them to use m
On 5/15/15, 5:31 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>It seems I've been wrong here, I didn't get well the context and I was
>missing data, I thougt FDB in Falcon was the donated version, it seems to
>be wrong and FDB is only a copy of the one in the Flex SDK, right ?
>
>If I'm correct, wh
Hi Alex,
It seems I've been wrong here, I didn't get well the context and I was missing
data, I thougt FDB in Falcon was the donated version, it seems to be wrong and
FDB is only a copy of the one in the Flex SDK, right ?
If I'm correct, why don't we use the donated one which was based on Falco
Kevin, I am curious what are some of your motivations for trying out and
testing FlexJS?
Mike
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, kevin.godell
wrote:
> Thanks. The output arg worked. I added this little bit to the parameters of
> the custom external tool:
>
> -output=$ModuleFileDir$/bin/$ModuleNam
Thanks. The output arg worked. I added this little bit to the parameters of
the custom external tool:
-output=$ModuleFileDir$/bin/$ModuleName$.swf
It puts the swf in the bin folder. It even creates the bin folder if it
doesn't already exist.
I was also testing to see if Adobe Scout could pick up
Can someone on a Windows machine try some of the following Mustella
tests ? They are consistently failing on the Jenkins job.
spark/core/fxg/properties/fxgtemplate_masks mask_clip_mask
spark/core/fxg/properties/fxgtemplate_tester
blend_mode_radial_gradient_blends_blend_difference_radialgradient
46 matches
Mail list logo
