Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I'm cloning right now, too. @Alex, the missing empty folders, seems normal, because Git don't track folders just only files. In case we need it, it's necessary include a dummy file like ".dummy" or whatever other dummy name. -- Jose Barragan Software Architect Chief Codeoscopic Madrid C/. Infa

[VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 2.5.2 - RC3

*Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:* 1. Enable Flex SDK download stats tracking 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33426 (UI fix for license screen (show regular checkboxes)) 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33151 (Auto-update logic fix) 4. French and Dutch la

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I did a folder diff of the develop branch. Except for the line endings on a few files everything else is identical. We have 3 people who have tested SDK now. Anyone else around testing the git repos? Thanks, Om On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Om wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Ale

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches. > Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches. > > Your git directory will show the trunk (i.e. master) by default. I checked the git log and I do see develop

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC3 (was: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC2)

Hi, > Can you please build and commit the RC3 ? Done and checked in. You can release the hounds/start the vote :-) Justin

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

Hi, > I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wait. I give it at least 12 hours unless enough people take a detailed look at it. I've had a quick glance and the SDK history seems fine but I've not checked out the file and done a MD5 check on all of them. > The weekend is upon is

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > I will have this thread open for 4 hours. > Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we > leave it open for longer than 4 hours. > > Justin > > I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wai

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

HI, > I will have this thread open for 4 hours. Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we leave it open for longer than 4 hours. Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC3 (was: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC2)

Hi, > Can you please build and commit the RC3 ? Yep. I assume you used 2.5.2 a the version number? Thanks, Justin

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches. Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches. Is that expected and how do we move the branches? Otherwise, a unix diff matched for tlf. TLF has almost no history since it was donated from Adobe w/o history (was i

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing > empty > folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be > easy to fix. > > Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does. > > I thi

RE: Finishing the Git migration - Update

>Nevermind... I got the answer from Google. I needed to also install >ca-certificates into Cygwin. Gordon, Side note. If you use git bash, which comes as part of the git for windows package (which I am assuming you are on hence the Cygwin) you can actually do all of the things that you needed

RE: Finishing the Git migration - Update

Nevermind... I got the answer from Google. I needed to also install ca-certificates into Cygwin. - Gordon -Original Message- From: Gordon Smith Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: Finishing the Git migration - Update I installed git for Cygwin and

RE: Finishing the Git migration - Update

I installed git for Cygwin and tried git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git I get error: error setting certificate verify locations: CAfile: /usr/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt CApath: none while accessing http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/ask/flex-sdk.git/info/refs fa

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing empty folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be easy to fix. Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does. I think SDK is good to go. I will take a look at TLF now. On 3/15/13

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Quoting Alex Harui : In my simple mind, Falcon generates the AST then at some point in time the futures task for that compilation unit is asked for output. Current Falcon code calls the BURM which eventually calls an emitter, I'm assuming FalconJX does an AST tree walk instead of calling the B

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

In my simple mind, Falcon generates the AST then at some point in time the futures task for that compilation unit is asked for output. Current Falcon code calls the BURM which eventually calls an emitter, I'm assuming FalconJX does an AST tree walk instead of calling the BURM. There is no reducti

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

BTW, I have not seen one thing that you are asking for that doesn't contain an AST and node framework in the Falcon package. If it was me, I would create all the emitters exactly the same way be parsing the file, handling the AST, traversing it while outputting to the target, then writing

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Quoting Alex Harui : On 3/15/13 1:14 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: The problem is, SWF is so interconnected in the generator packages that you might have a problem getting a polarity with using the BURM. Don't know what "polarity" meant, but hopefully it doesn't really matter. Bad word

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On 3/15/13 1:14 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > The problem is, SWF is so > interconnected in the generator packages that you might have a problem > getting a polarity with using the BURM. Don't know what "polarity" meant, but hopefully it doesn't really matter. > > On that note; This would t

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

There is no major surgery anywhere. If you study the framework like I have, there is really only one way to assemble a compiler in Falcon. What I haven't done is allow for this other processing (css, properties). Honestly this has not even fit into a use case for me and I never thought ab

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I got a successful build from the git SDK (after applying the Justin style workaround for the TLF issue). EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN. > > > On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote: > >> The TLF repo

[DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC3 (was: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.5 RC2)

Hi Justin, Can you please build and commit the RC3 ? Thanks, -Fred

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

I'll leave the question on how much FalconJx is different from FalconJS - and if you can "just copy" stuff over - to Mike. I'm just the guy who copy-pastes (?) bits of code around and tries to look cool doing it. Mike? EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 3/15/13

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On 3/15/13 12:56 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> don't believe that any of the work I am doing is wasted. FalconJS is not >> the competition, it is just a stop-gap place for me to experiment until >> FalconJX catches up. > > Ok, I wrote too long a statement (as ususal). The TL;DR version is: i

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

> don't believe that any of the work I am doing is wasted. FalconJS is not > the competition, it is just a stop-gap place for me to experiment until > FalconJX catches up. Ok, I wrote too long a statement (as ususal). The TL;DR version is: if you continue to work on FalconJS, I won't be able to k

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN. On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote: > The TLF repo is up as well here: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not > the same repo as the earlier one) > > Same 4 hour window for testing and rep

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On 3/15/13 11:54 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> My personal goals: >> 1) For the year: get a major Adobe customer to buy into using this >> technology. This helps ensure I can continue to work on it full time. I >> will shift my priorities in order to grab such a customer. For example >> tod

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

My command line SVN is too new a format (it claims) for Apache SVN and my GUI client thinks it needs to download a million and a half entries before it can tell me anything. So, no way to answer your question on my end. EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Om wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that > is... > > EdB > > How far does the history in SVN go back? > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > I'm cloning right now (88% done), will t

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that is... EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and > look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this... > > EdB > > > > On

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this... EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Om wrote: > The TLF repo is up as well here: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not >

Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

The TLF repo is up as well here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not the same repo as the earlier one) Same 4 hour window for testing and reporting issues. Those who are testing or plan to test, can you please let me know right away? Thanks, Om On Fri, Mar 1

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

> My personal goals: > 1) For the year: get a major Adobe customer to buy into using this > technology. This helps ensure I can continue to work on it full time. I > will shift my priorities in order to grab such a customer. For example > today I am enhancing HTTPService because a potential cust

[NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing

David@Infra says: [~bigosmallm] flex-sdk is up here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git Please review and let me know. Everyone, please review the new git repo and let me know if you see any issues. Moreover, even though the url repo

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I think we need one "little big" push to get FlexJS to work on > FalconJx. From that point on, all of these efforts will be on one > stack (Falcon - FalconJx - output classes/modules/plugins). This > integration will benefit all of these co

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On 3/15/13 10:00 AM, "Om" wrote: >> Once this ever extending forced (or self imposed?) period of >> inactivity while we wait for git might be just the thing we need to >> synchronise our efforts and (dare one say it...) talk about a near >> future roadmap a bit? >> >> EdB >> > > +1 for som

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Quoting Om : On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: BTW, When I say I am not interested in the view cross compilation... All that means is that I am saying don't wait for me to implement any of it. I am being very direct in what my goals are with FlaconJx anyways, I just wa

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I think we need one "little big" push to get FlexJS to work on > FalconJx. From that point on, all of these efforts will be on one > stack (Falcon - FalconJx - output classes/modules/plugins). This > integration will benefit all of these com

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > BTW, > > When I say I am not interested in the view cross compilation... All that > means is that I am saying don't wait for me to implement any of it. I am > being very direct in what my goals are with FlaconJx anyways, I just wanted > so

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > FWIW, Peter and I are pretty much done with the basic set of unstyleable, > unskinnable HTML4 components. Peter and I were going to work on styleable > HTML4 components next then tackle HTML5 and bitmap skinning, but maybe we > should jump to

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Nobody said it was simple... it's just that he put it together really quickly ;-) EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Sebastian Mohr wrote: > Thanks Om, > > Didn't expect that the FXG to SVG interoperability could be so simple. Will > think about its implications :) > > > -- > Sebastian (PPMC

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

I think we need one "little big" push to get FlexJS to work on FalconJx. From that point on, all of these efforts will be on one stack (Falcon - FalconJx - output classes/modules/plugins). This integration will benefit all of these components in that we can report bugs and define requirements back

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Thanks Om, Didn't expect that the FXG to SVG interoperability could be so simple. Will think about its implications :) -- Sebastian (PPMC) Interaction Designer Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code: http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample On Fr

Re: [flexJS] Is SimpleCSSValuesImpl required StyleClass?

Yes, I put up a new zip in case the old one was buggy. If that doesn't work, send me the output SWF so I can see what it has in it. On 3/15/13 12:45 AM, "jun funakura" wrote: > Thanks for your advice, Alex. > >> The compiler should have generated that file for you. Are you sure you ran >> th

Re: FXG Extension for Photoshop CS5

On 3/15/13 4:07 AM, "jude" wrote: >> >> If you play with the prototype, it leverages absolute position and so far, >> it seems to work reasonably consistently. What isn't consistent is the >> default chrome around widgets. I'm not an expert on HTML/JS, but I believe >> the biggest inconsis

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

BTW, When I say I am not interested in the view cross compilation... All that means is that I am saying don't wait for me to implement any of it. I am being very direct in what my goals are with FlaconJx anyways, I just wanted something that would cross compile actionscript to a multiple

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

FWIW, Peter and I are pretty much done with the basic set of unstyleable, unskinnable HTML4 components. Peter and I were going to work on styleable HTML4 components next then tackle HTML5 and bitmap skinning, but maybe we should jump to wrapping the HTML5 components so you can try getting your ski

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

My iPhone 5 shows the red square with rounded corner, text above it and within it and an onclick alert. EdB On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Om wrote: > BTW, the html svg part works fine on the Android browser as well, with > exactly the same look and feel as the Flex app! > > Can someone test

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

BTW, the html svg part works fine on the Android browser as well, with exactly the same look and feel as the Flex app! Can someone test on an iOS device, please? Thanks, Om On Mar 15, 2013 4:03 AM, "Om" wrote: > I quickly whipped up a proof of concept proving the FXG to SVG > interoperability.

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

Next week I have more work than I have hours in the day for. :-( The following week is a holiday for me. If no one has started on this by the week after that, (the first week in April) I'll be happy to build a skeleton project to get this started. Of course, I'll need to figure out where to host

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Right, And this is why I wrote another compiler for as to js. Try doing what you want with the FalconJS code base, good luck, if you can I salute you. Don't take what I said as arrogance, I am saying I am a framework architect, I can't concern myself with what you are worried about. I h

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Om, > > At this point and time, I am not worried about rendering. I am more > concerned about straight business logic getting cross compiled. > > I am worried about it and hence scratching my itch :-) I have not seen any proposal better t

Re: FXG Extension for Photoshop CS5

Shumway is really good. Use it in droid Firefox On Mar 15, 2013 12:13 PM, "jude" wrote: > This looks interesting. It's not clear if other browsers can use this > project or will use it. He also states it's only supporting features up to > version 10 at this time. > > Shumway is an experimental we

Re: FXG Extension for Photoshop CS5

This looks interesting. It's not clear if other browsers can use this project or will use it. He also states it's only supporting features up to version 10 at this time. Shumway is an experimental web-native runtime implementation of the SWF file format. It is developed as a free and open source p

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

Om, At this point and time, I am not worried about rendering. I am more concerned about straight business logic getting cross compiled. This is probably why you have heard anything, I talk a lot on this forum and haven't said anything about it. :) I don't even own up to date Adobe program

Re: FXG Extension for Photoshop CS5

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 3/14/13 10:45 AM, "jude" wrote: > > > One of the reasons we like Flash and Flex is because it gives the > > consistent visual results across platforms. I'm a little concerned that > we > > are adopting JS and HTML approaches and will

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Harbs wrote: > There's no reason we need to rely on Adobe for this. It's really not such > a big deal to create extensions that export to FXG. > > I have a lot of CS Extension experience and it would be an interesting > project. Of course, I don't have that much s

FXG to SVG - working example

I quickly whipped up a proof of concept proving the FXG to SVG interoperability. The working demo can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/fxg2svg/svg.html (Tested to be working fine on Chrome 25, Firefox 19 and IE 10 on Windows) I did not have time to write a stylesheet, so I hand

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

Some one with a solution... refreshing. Harbs, you have my respect. Warning; do it your self project ahead, no bottle feeding from Adobe! BTW, I love 100 character subject lines. Mike Quoting Harbs : There's no reason we need to rely on Adobe for this. It's really not such a big deal to cr

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

There's no reason we need to rely on Adobe for this. It's really not such a big deal to create extensions that export to FXG. I have a lot of CS Extension experience and it would be an interesting project. Of course, I don't have that much spare time… ;-) If we really think that FXG support is

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

Because Adobe is gaming and games use Bitmaps. You're some day going to have to realize FXG was a Flex construct and to Adobe, Flex is dead. Why do you waste time try to talk to a brick wall? Mike Quoting Sebastian Mohr : Thanks John, In case these "key differences" between FXG and SVG

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

Perhaps the lack of FXG support is indicative of Adobe's future support for Flash tehcnology in general? Oops, did I really say that? On 15 March 2013 11:16, Sebastian Mohr wrote: > Thanks John, > > In case these "key differences" between FXG and SVG still exist, I don't > understand why Adobe f

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

Thanks John, In case these "key differences" between FXG and SVG still exist, I don't understand why Adobe folks consider not to support FXG 2.0 and forthcoming versions of FXG in their design tools - like Photoshop CS6 (and later), Illustrator CS6 (and later) and Fireworks CS6 (and later) ??? -

Re: Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

second hiton google for "why fxg over svg": When initial work on an XML-based graphics interchange format began, the natural first thought was to use SVG. However, there are key differences between SVG and Flash Player’s g

Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update

Ok, I don't think we've got the thing for windows except with git bash .-Fred -Message d'origine- From: RIAstar Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:34 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update Not sure it helps but if you're talking about directory/f

Why did Adobe create FXG although we had SVG already? (was: FXG 2.0 donation progress concerns and Adobe design tool support)

@Alex ... you wrote this: > Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well? What is it about FXG > that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not Flash? I don't know why Adobe created FXG? For now, I just know that I need it for my work as interaction designer when working

Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update

Not sure it helps but if you're talking about directory/file completion Thanks, but I was referring to the git commands, branch names, remotes, etc.: labels related to Git and the Git repo. Directory/file completion works fine. There is a Git tab completion package in Cygwin, but I installed it

Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update

But I couldn't get tab completion to work for the git commands Not sure it helps but if you're talking about directory/file completion, it works for me using windows git on Cygwin, I can't remember how it worked with *nix. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: RIAstar Sent: Friday, Marc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Skinning architecture and design tool support in Apache Flex 5 (codename "Arthur")

Sorry, I found a mistake ;) Of cause "Fireworks CS6 (and later)" 4) FXG 2.0 (or later) should be supported by Adobe design tools - like Photoshop CS6 (and later), Illustrator CS6 (and later) and Fireworks CS6 (and later) -- Sebastian (PPMC) Interaction Designer Looking for a Login Example wit

Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update

On the command line, I use Cygwin which is easier because I use a lot of other command line tools there. But I couldn't get tab completion to work for the git commands. These do work as expected in Msysgit. Also, if you're an IntelliJ user: their Git integration is very, very good. Though you h

[PROPOSAL] Skinning architecture and design tool support in Apache Flex 5 (codename "Arthur")

Hi, I wonder about the changes of the next skinning architecture in Apache Flex 5 - possibly codenamed after Doug Arthur [1]. My hope is that the following goals would be achieved: 1) Get rid of the old MX namespace and place the old Flex 3 components into optional SWC files (e.g. framework_flex

Re: [flexJS] Is SimpleCSSValuesImpl required StyleClass?

Thanks for your advice, Alex. > The compiler should have generated that file for you. Are you sure you ran > the "FlexJS (Debug Build)" external tool? Yes, I do these process. external tool config set ENV "FLEXJS_HOME" ant "GOOG_HOME" like FLEXJS_HOME=/User/flex/dev/flex-sdks/Flexjs4.9/js/src GO