@Alex ... you wrote this:

> Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about FXG
> that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not Flash?

I don't know why Adobe created FXG? For now, I just know that I need it for
my work as interaction designer when working with Flash Catalyst CS5.5 ...
Hopefully, Adobe folks on this list could explain that!


-- 
Sebastian (PPMC)
Interaction Designer

Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code:
http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample


On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 3/14/13 12:33 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what Adobe gains by continuing to
> >> spend resources on FXG support at this time.  If you can show there
> would
> >> be
> >> a significant upside, I will try to bring that case to the right people
> in
> >> Adobe.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I am not sure how I can convince Adobe, but here is my reasoning:  At my
> > current and previous companies, Fireworks is used just because of its
> > ability to convert visual designs into FXG.    We dabbled with Catalyst,
> > but we found that the tool was too complicated to use for Designers, but
> > too elementary for Developers.  But, the ability to serialize visual
> assets
> > as FXG turned out to be the best way to skin Flex apps.
> >
> > On the other side, I am very proficient with Photoshop and not too
> familiar
> > with Fireworks.  For my simple apps, I choose to create the skins in
> > Photoshop and spit it out as FXG and just import it into Flex.
> >
> > I know other folks that used Illustrator for the same purpose.  (BTW,
> > Illustrator CS6 still supports the "Save As... > FXG > FXG 2.0" option.
>  I
> > just tried it out last night.  Not sure what to make of this. )
> >
> > Thats the possibility of three different tools Adobe could make money of
> > off from customers who don't necessarily use these tools without FXG
> > support.
> >
> > And frankly, the absence of this utility could potentially hurt my chance
> > of making sure we dont move away from Flex where I work.
> Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about FXG
> that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not Flash?
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>

Reply via email to