Next week I have more work than I have hours in the day for. :-(

The following week is a holiday for me. If no one has started on this by the 
week after that, (the first week in April) I'll be happy to build a skeleton 
project to get this started. Of course, I'll need to figure out where to host 
it… ;-)

Personally, I'd start with converting InDesign objects because that's the DOM 
I'm most familiar with (and has the best scripting support).

What do we need to support?

1) Fireworks has FXG export built in. What about SVG? I think someone might 
have done that already…
2) Illustrator has SVG export. I think we'd just need a SVG to FXG converter.
3) I don't think Photoshop has either SVG or FXG export. We'd have to do that 
from scratch.
4) Ditto for InDesign (but easier than Photoshop).
5) Flash? It has FXG built in (obviously). Does it have SVG as well?

What else? 

Harbs

On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Om wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> There's no reason we need to rely on Adobe for this. It's really not such
>> a big deal to create extensions that export to FXG.
>> 
>> I have a lot of CS Extension experience and it would be an interesting
>> project. Of course, I don't have that much spare time… ;-)
>> 
>> If we really think that FXG support is important, I can definitely help
>> with work a CS Extension for the apps that need it. The scripting support
>> in the different apps range from nearly complete, to pretty sparse, but I
>> imagine we could get pretty good coverage in most of them. Which apps would
>> you say needs the SVG/FXG support? I think we should have a single parsing
>> mechanism and convert to/from SVG and FXG.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>> 
> I have dabbled with CSIDE.  I can help you out if you start this project.
> 
> Thanks,
> Om
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Sebastian Mohr wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks John,
>>> 
>>> In case these "key differences" between FXG and SVG still exist, I don't
>>> understand why Adobe folks consider not to support FXG 2.0 and
>> forthcoming
>>> versions of FXG in their design tools - like Photoshop CS6 (and later),
>>> Illustrator CS6 (and later) and Fireworks CS6 (and later) ???
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sebastian (PPMC)
>>> Interaction Designer
>>> 
>>> Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, John Cunliffe <mahn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> second hit<
>>>> 
>> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/09/30/why-adobe-chose-fxg-over-svg/
>>>>> on
>>>> google for "why fxg over svg":
>>>> 
>>>> When initial work on an XML-based graphics interchange format began, the
>>>> natural first thought was to use SVG. However, there are key differences
>>>> between SVG and Flash Player’s graphics capabilities. These include core
>>>> differences in SVG and Flash’s rendering model with regards to filters,
>>>> transforms and text. Additionally, the interchange format needed to be
>> able
>>>> to support future Flash Player features, which would not necessarily
>> map to
>>>> SVG features. As such, the decision was made to go with a new
>> interchange
>>>> format, FXG, instead of having a non-standard implementation of SVG. FXG
>>>> does borrow from SVG whenever possible.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Mohr <
>> flex.masul...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> @Alex ... you wrote this:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about
>>>> FXG
>>>>>> that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not
>> Flash?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't know why Adobe created FXG? For now, I just know that I need it
>>>> for
>>>>> my work as interaction designer when working with Flash Catalyst CS5.5
>>>> ...
>>>>> Hopefully, Adobe folks on this list could explain that!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian (PPMC)
>>>>> Interaction Designer
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this
>> code:
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 3/14/13 12:33 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what Adobe gains by continuing to
>>>>>>>> spend resources on FXG support at this time.  If you can show there
>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> a significant upside, I will try to bring that case to the right
>>>>> people
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> Adobe.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am not sure how I can convince Adobe, but here is my reasoning:  At
>>>>> my
>>>>>>> current and previous companies, Fireworks is used just because of its
>>>>>>> ability to convert visual designs into FXG.    We dabbled with
>>>>> Catalyst,
>>>>>>> but we found that the tool was too complicated to use for Designers,
>>>>> but
>>>>>>> too elementary for Developers.  But, the ability to serialize visual
>>>>>> assets
>>>>>>> as FXG turned out to be the best way to skin Flex apps.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On the other side, I am very proficient with Photoshop and not too
>>>>>> familiar
>>>>>>> with Fireworks.  For my simple apps, I choose to create the skins in
>>>>>>> Photoshop and spit it out as FXG and just import it into Flex.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I know other folks that used Illustrator for the same purpose.  (BTW,
>>>>>>> Illustrator CS6 still supports the "Save As... > FXG > FXG 2.0"
>>>> option.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> just tried it out last night.  Not sure what to make of this. )
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thats the possibility of three different tools Adobe could make money
>>>>> of
>>>>>>> off from customers who don't necessarily use these tools without FXG
>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And frankly, the absence of this utility could potentially hurt my
>>>>> chance
>>>>>>> of making sure we dont move away from Flex where I work.
>>>>>> Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about
>>>> FXG
>>>>>> that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not
>> Flash?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to