On 4/25/2018 2:32 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> There are two cases of disable:
>>> 1- Disabling a "queue level offload" enabled queue_setup() previously
>>> 2- Disabling a "queue level offload" enabled in configure()
>>>
>>> If second is not supported, to disable the offload, applications should
>>>
25/04/2018 15:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 4/24/2018 11:00 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First, this is my summary after the survey answers and comments:
> >
> > 1/ allow "forgetting" port offloads in queue offloads setup
> >
> > 2/ update documentation, applications and remove checks in
On 4/24/2018 11:00 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, this is my summary after the survey answers and comments:
>
> 1/ allow "forgetting" port offloads in queue offloads setup
>
> 2/ update documentation, applications and remove checks in PMDs for 18.05-rc2
>
> 3/ an offload enabled at
Hi,
First, this is my summary after the survey answers and comments:
1/ allow "forgetting" port offloads in queue offloads setup
2/ update documentation, applications and remove checks in PMDs for 18.05-rc2
3/ an offload enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level
4/ The queue cap
szynski ; Jianbo Liu
>> ; Alejandro Lucero
>> ; Hemant Agrawal ;
>> Shreyansh Jain ; Harish
>> Patil ; Rasesh Mody ;
>> Andrew Rybchenko ;
>> Shrikrishna Khare ; Maxime Coquelin
>> ; Legacy, Allain (Wind River)
>> ; Richardson, Bruce
>> ; Gaetan R
Andrew
> Rybchenko ;
> Shrikrishna Khare ; Maxime Coquelin
> ; Legacy, Allain (Wind River)
> ; Richardson, Bruce
> ; Gaetan Rivet ; Olivier
> Matz
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Survey for final decision about per-port offload API
>
> On 4/24/2018 12:08 PM, Ananyev,
Tuesday, April 24, 2018 1:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Survey for final decision about per-port offload API
>
> On 3/30/2018 2:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> > "To enable per
On 4/24/2018 12:08 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
>
>>
>> On 3/30/2018 2:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
>>> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
>>> device configuration and queue
Hi Ferruh,
>
> On 3/30/2018 2:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> > "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> > device configuration and queue setup."
> >
> > It means the application must repeat t
On 3/30/2018 2:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> device configuration and queue setup."
>
> It means the application must repeat the port offload flags
On Friday 30 March 2018 07:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
"To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
device configuration and queue setup."
It means the application must repeat the port offloa
Hi Thomas,
On 03/30/2018 03:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
"To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
device configuration and queue setup."
It means the application must repeat the port offl
-Original Message-
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:47:55 +0200
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde , Jerin Jacob
> , Shijith Thotton
> , Santosh Shukla
> , Rahul Lakkireddy
> , John Daley , Wenzhuo
> Lu , Konstantin Ananyev
> , Beilei Xing , Qi
> Zhang , Jingj
Hi
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> device configuration and queue setup."
>
> It means the application must repeat the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:47:55PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> device configuration and queue setup."
>
> It means the application must repeat the
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 6:47 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> device configuration and queue setup."
>
> It means the application must repeat the port
Hi,
Inline.
Thanks,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 6:48 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ; Santosh Shukla
> ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley (johndale) ;
> Wenzhuo Lu ; Konstantin Ananyev
> ; B
Monday, April 2, 2018 6:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
> 01/04/2018 06:44, Shahaf Shuler:
> > > There is the same kind of confusion in the offload capabilities:
> > > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_offload_capa
> > > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > > The queue capabilities must be a subset of po
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ; Santosh Shukla
> ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley ; Lu,
> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Xing,
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon
Date: Monday, April 2, 2018 at 1:10 PM
To: Harish Patil
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Ajit Khaparde
, "Jacob, Jerin"
, "Thotton, Shijith"
, "Shukla, Santosh"
, Rahul Lakkireddy
, John Daley , Wenzhuo
Lu , Konstantin Ananyev
, Beilei Xing , Qi
Zhang , Jin
02/04/2018 19:39, Patil, Harish:
> >It was also proposed to relax the API and allow "forgetting" port
> >offloads in queue offloads:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092978.html
> >
> >It would mean the offloads applied to a queue result of OR operation:
> > rte_eth_conf.[rt]x
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon
Date: Friday, March 30, 2018 at 6:47 AM
To: "dev@dpdk.org"
Cc: Ajit Khaparde , "Jacob, Jerin"
, "Thotton, Shijith"
, "Shukla, Santosh"
, Rahul Lakkireddy
, John Daley , Wenzhuo
Lu , Konstantin Ananyev
, Beilei Xing , Qi
Zhang , Jingjing Wu , Adri
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 6:48 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ;
> Santosh Shukla ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin ;
> Xing
01/04/2018 06:44, Shahaf Shuler:
> > There is the same kind of confusion in the offload capabilities:
> > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_offload_capa
> > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > The queue capabilities must be a subset of port capabilities, i.e. every
> > queue
> > capabilitie
01/04/2018 03:51, Zhang, Qi Z:
> > There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> > "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> > device configuration and queue setup."
> >
> > It means the application must repeat the port offload flags in
> > r
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ; Santosh Shukla
> ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley ; Lu,
> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Xing,
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ; Santosh Shukla
> ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley ; Lu,
> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Xin
Friday, March 30, 2018 4:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon:
> Subject: Survey for final decision about per-port offload API
>
> There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
> "To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
> device configuration and queue se
Hi Thomas:
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 9:48 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde ; Jerin Jacob
> ; Shijith Thotton
> ; Santosh Shukla
> ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; John Daley ; Lu,
> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>
30/03/2018 17:13, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 03/30/2018 04:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > There is the same kind of confusion in the offload capabilities:
> > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_offload_capa
> > rte_eth_dev_info.[rt]x_queue_offload_capa
> > The queue capabilities must be a subset of port
On 03/30/2018 04:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
"To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
device configuration and queue setup."
It means the application must repeat the port offload flags
in
There are some discussions about a specific part of the offload API:
"To enable per-port offload, the offload should be set on both
device configuration and queue setup."
It means the application must repeat the port offload flags
in rte_eth_conf.[rt]xmode.offloads and rte_eth_[rt]
32 matches
Mail list logo
