I could not reply earlier, Sergey knows I am (still) attending to my
company's internal event ;)
Just couple first thoughts on the subject.
The FIQL that we suport is quite simple and basically is about comparing
properties of given entity with constant values and then combine these
simple boolea
Well, you can't get pizza that is decent in the US anyways, :P
On Feb 2, 2011, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> -1... what is reputable? Who decides who is "reputable"? Am I reputable?
>
> Apache is not about tooting your own horn. Go back to your respective
> company and have them purchas
I agree with Dan and Glenn. Commercial support makes CXF stronger and
provides a way for active committers (and some inactive one as well)
to earn a living while doing what they love doing.
Letting companies put up some marketing blurb on the support page
and/or on a dedicated Commercial Offering p
Lets make something clear here so we can delineate the difference between the
contributions folks make. If someone is truly inactive and not making
contributions of value, then we can request emeritus. I think our fearless
leader Dan has done an outstanding job of keeping on that issue. Contr
Speaking as a member of the community (non-commiter outside of a few patches) I
don't have a problem with the claims which the CXF supporting companies make on
their own site. They are paying people to forward the development of CXF, they
should get to stick out their chest and let it be known.
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 10:28:50 pm Jeff Genender wrote:
> -1... what is reputable? Who decides who is "reputable"? Am I reputable?
Umm was that last question rhetorical? Do you really want me to answer
that? Can you really trust someone who gets plastered on less than a single
+1 and well said.
Jeff
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Craig Tataryn wrote:
> Speaking as a member of the community (non-commiter outside of a few patches)
> I don't have a problem with the claims which the CXF supporting companies
> make on their own site. They are paying people to forward the d
Well said, Dan.
And BTW... did you tell anyone the alcohol content of that beer? ;-) Low blow
man! ;-)
Jeff
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011 10:28:50 pm Jeff Genender wrote:
>> -1... what is reputable? Who decides who is "reputable"? Am I reput
Eric, I am still trying to decide if you are serious or just fooling around.
I thought we clarified this in private. Public is fine too. Comments inline.
If I come across as upset, I am!
Hadrian
On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> I agree with Dan and Glenn. Commercial support
+1 for working out a policy for commercial marketing in CXF resources
(wiki, mailing list, subversion, ..).
My proposal is that we create a policy in a wiki page, let it mature a
bit and then call a vote on it.
So we have some guideline for people who create marketing statements in
the wiki or
There, even non committers get it. Spot on. Thanks Craig for speaking up!
Hadrian
On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Craig Tataryn wrote:
> Speaking as a member of the community (non-commiter outside of a few patches)
> I don't have a problem with the claims which the CXF supporting companies
> mak
I agree with Jeff. By stating 'a beer' and not stating the alcohol content, you
knew the readers will make wrong assumptions.
This is strikingly similar to the marketing practices on the apache site.
(For the record, the alcohol content was much lower than some wines, not
mentioning vodka.)
;)
ORLY? For the record:
http://www.brewdog.com/sink_the_bismark
41% baby!!!
Jeff
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I agree with Jeff. By stating 'a beer' and not stating the alcohol content,
> you knew the readers will make wrong assumptions.
> This is strikingly similar to
Hadrian,
We discussed a specific instance in private. I was happy to accept
your guidelines given your position as PMC Chair of Apache Camel and
will abide by them. As the existence of this thread evidences, the
boundaries of what is acceptable for companies to place on a project
site is not clear
Looks like more clarification is in order. I am not a CXF committer.
My role in the Apache Camel project has no relevance here. Here I
speak as an Apache member. One of the duties of Apache members is
to provide oversight to other projects which, experience taught us,
is a useful and necessary thi
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 18:18, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Looks like more clarification is in order. I am not a CXF committer.
> My role in the Apache Camel project has no relevance here. Here I
> speak as an Apache member. One of the duties of Apache members is
> to provide oversight to other projec
On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:53:30 am Christian Schneider wrote:
> +1 for working out a policy for commercial marketing in CXF resources
> (wiki, mailing list, subversion, ..).
I've updated the page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Commercial+CXF+Offerings
(will sync live in
+1 Dan thanks for doing this.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:53:30 am Christian Schneider wrote:
>> +1 for working out a policy for commercial marketing in CXF resources
>> (wiki, mailing list, subversion, ..).
>
>
> I've updated the page:
>
Hi Andy
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Andrzej Michalec wrote:
>
> I could not reply earlier, Sergey knows I am (still) attending to my
> company's internal event ;)
>
thanks for finding the time to reply,
> Just couple first thoughts on the subject.
>
> The FIQL that we suport is quite simp
Sounds good for me.
What I would have imagined for a complete policy is how to handle other
pages and e.g. the mailing list. I think we could add to the policies
that promotion of products on other
wiki pages ist not allowed. Perhaps on the articles page links to
articles about cxf + products
Hi
I'm looking at the XMLStreamDataReader in the SourceDataBinding and trying
to figure out what I can 'borrow' :-) from that code
to have the JAX-RS SourceProvider optimized.
The XMLStreamDataReader calls a resetForStreaming(XMLStreamReader) function,
when StaxSource or SAXSource is expected whi
On Thursday 03 February 2011 5:08:10 pm Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm looking at the XMLStreamDataReader in the SourceDataBinding and trying
> to figure out what I can 'borrow' :-) from that code
> to have the JAX-RS SourceProvider optimized.
>
> The XMLStreamDataReader calls a resetForStr
In my opinion, the first amendment is relatively relevant to the
mailing list. A polite, infrequent, announcement of a commercial
offering of potential interest to the users is just find by me,
personally, and I know of no ASF policy to the contrary. It is of
course going to be a matter of gray to
23 matches
Mail list logo
