Re: Question: Howto Google Season of Docs submissions

2022-03-16 Thread Roberto Galoppini
ip and > payments. I will ask at the legal-discuss - good idea (I will CC: you and > Dinesh then. > > > > J. > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 4:57 PM Roberto Galoppini < > roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >&g

Re: Question: Howto Google Season of Docs submissions

2022-03-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:49 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Yeah, The problem is that they now require the organizations to Pay (at > least in GsOD). So anyone who steps up needs to know first if this is at > all possible within the ASF as an organisation (when we submit the project > we confirm that

Re: Tools for the Apache Maturity Model

2015-03-25 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi again Bertrand and everyone, sorry to be late following, see in line comments. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Roberto Galoppini < rgalopp...@slashdotmedia.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >

Re: Tools for the Apache Maturity Model

2015-02-02 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Roberto, > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Roberto Galoppini > wrote: > > ...Davide (cc-ed) kindly created an alpha > > version for the new born Apache Maturity Model, you can see it live at >

Tools for the Apache Maturity Model

2015-01-30 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi all, as briefly mentioned in another thread http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201501.mbox/browser in the past I've been working on a pragmatic methodology to evaluate open source projects, mostly based on QSOS metrics. The EU-funded PROSE project released an enhanced vers

Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

2015-01-20 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: > >> I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to undertake >> self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a process of review >> involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc.

Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

2015-01-07 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Sent from a miserable mobile device > On 07/gen/2015, at 09:26, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 06/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> With regard to "competitors," I just remind myself that forking is a >> feature and that community before code means not acting like a >> competitor. One shou

Re: Code of conduct

2014-11-18 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Christopher wrote: > At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct > policies that I've seen. > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > As many of you are n

[events] ODF Plugfest event next month in UK

2014-11-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi all, few of us are part of the ODF Plugfest organising committee, as such I've just sorted out that the next ODF Plugfest will happen very soon. Is anyone able to participate? http://plugfest.opendocumentformat.org/ Roberto

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-29 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-10-27 13:57 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini : > > > 2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > >> On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: >> >>> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for >>> the SF-based replacement fo

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-27 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: > >> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for >> the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below. >> Comments/Input welcome. >> https://sourceforge.net/directory/vert

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-01 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:18 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende > > wrote: > > > Great David, > > > > > >Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top > > downloads, > > > etc