On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > > On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: > >> I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to undertake >> self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a process of review >> involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc. >> > > No, I absolutely don't want to create another stack of overhead, or Yet > Another hoop to jump through, as you said. > > I think "directed self-evaluation" is the way I'd want to go - one or two > persons from ComDev, in conjunction with two or three persons from the PMC, > doing an evaluation. I imagine this as a function of ComDev, not of the > board. That is, it's a community/project strengthening exercise, not a Big > Hammer. > Along this line - self-evaluation - sometimes ago I designed a methodology and a tool for that, mostly based on QSOS (*). Recently it has been distributed with an open source license, and more important it has been generalized so that it could be used to run different methodologies (included extending the original one). Another set od useful resources for measuring open source are Grimoire metrics tools (**), partially included in Apache Allura. Roberto (*) http://www.qsos.org/ | used metrics explained here: http://sosopensource.com/395.html | downloads: https://opensourceprojects.eu/p/osp/osseval/wiki/OSSEval/ (**) http://blog.bitergia.com/tag/metrics-grimoire/ > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
