[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475113#comment-17475113
]
Hellakala Gamage Dineth Shan Gimhana edited comment on COMDEV-413 at 1/13/22,
5:28 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475113#comment-17475113
]
Hellakala Gamage Dineth Shan Gimhana edited comment on COMDEV-413 at 1/13/22,
5:28 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475113#comment-17475113
]
Hellakala Gamage Dineth Shan Gimhana commented on COMDEV-413:
-
> And speaking from my extremely parochial POV as part of the SpamAssassin
> project, I know that our requests for "support" often amount to
> embedding special dispensation for sketchy practices, so I don't think
> anyone working on *OUR* project could "lift" it without telling
> subscribers "NO!"
>
> I expect I know the answer to this but do any of your sponsors require
> (or even request) that you mention them in the project web site or in the
> README?
No. And this is something I would never be able to agree to because
the agreement is with me not with PMC/project.
But for example Astron
يعني وش السالفة . شوفوا مودي طيب
في الأربعاء، ١٢ يناير ٢٠٢٢ ٩:١٢ م Bill Cole <
sa-bugz-20080...@billmail.scconsult.com> كتب:
> On 2022-01-12 at 08:51:37 UTC-0500 (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:51:37 -0500)
> Jim Jagielski
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothi
On 2022-01-12 at 08:51:37 UTC-0500 (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:51:37 -0500)
Jim Jagielski
is rumored to have said:
IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothing associated with
this. It should neither encourage or condone it. In no way should we
enter into any agreement, contract, whatever, w
On 2022-01-12 at 10:41:22 UTC-0500 (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:41:22 -0700)
Ralph Goers
is rumored to have said:
That said, if the Tidelift model for people to be funded was “Your
project must adhere to all ASF process and guidelines AND you must
have a minimum of 3 active committers (proven by them
> On Jan 11, 2022, at 10:03 AM, Mohammad Noureldin
> wrote:
>
> Hi Harjout,
>
> In addition to what has been suggested by Maxim, I would like your feedback
> on something.
>
> Where on the Apache Community Development website [1] you've that you may
> need to send an email to mentors@ ?. Yo
Jarek,
I expect I know the answer to this but do any of your sponsors require
(or even request) that you mention them in the project web site or in the
README?
What you are doing sounds fine to me simply because the agreement
you have doesn’t obligate the PMC to anything.
Tidelift’s business
Fascinating discussion. My understanding is exactly what Jim explained.
I also can explain how it works for me as an individual in Apache
Airflow. Apache Airflow has multiple stakeholders and I have regular
contracts with a few of them: Google, Astronomer. Also I got a
one-time GitHub Sponsorship
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:50 PM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Recently the Logging Services PMC was approached by Tidelift offering to
> provide monetary support either to the project or individual committers. To
> obtain that sponsorship the project has to agree to the terms at
> https
> On Jan 12, 2022, at 10:41 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> While I agree with your conclusion I do disagree with how you get there.
>
> In your first message you seemed to think that the “self-serving nature” of
> what Tidelift is doing is any different than what many companies have b
> On Jan 12, 2022, at 8:34 AM, Mohammad Noureldin
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 questions:
> 1- How did that work in the case of Apache Struts ? Any details can be
> shared ?
In the case of Struts it appears there is only a single active committer and he
is the sole
person receiving funds
Jim,
While I agree with your conclusion I do disagree with how you get there.
In your first message you seemed to think that the “self-serving nature” of
what Tidelift is doing is any different than what many companies have been
doing to the ASF. I am a member of the Flume PMC and my employer
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:58 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Over in the Apache HTTPD project, both the HTTP/2 and the new mod_tls
> modules were paid for by outside entities. That is, this entity wanted
> these modules to exist, contracted out w/ a 3rd party to write/develop
> them, and then back
Over in the Apache HTTPD project, both the HTTP/2 and the new mod_tls modules
were paid for by outside entities. That is, this entity wanted these modules to
exist, contracted out w/ a 3rd party to write/develop them, and then backed
away. There was no guarantee that these modules would even be
On 1/12/22 09:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
I agree that people should handle their affairs as they see fit RE Tidelift
but how should this be allowed to trickle in on Apache WRT mentions in web
sites and files like readme. IOW, should structs assets remove mentions of
Tidelift?
Yes. The arrangem
I agree that people should handle their affairs as they see fit RE Tidelift
but how should this be allowed to trickle in on Apache WRT mentions in web
sites and files like readme. IOW, should structs assets remove mentions of
Tidelift?
Gary
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, 08:52 Jim Jagielski wrote:
> IMO
IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothing associated with this. It
should neither encourage or condone it. In no way should we enter into any
agreement, contract, whatever, w/ Tidelift. If Tidelift wishes to work
independently and directly w/ people, that's fine. But having the ASF a
Hi Maxim!
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:51 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Should I change my semi-automatic-answer? :)
> Maybe add section or correct some wording? :)
>
1st of all, nothing wrong at all regarding your semi-automatic-answer
(using your own words :) ). On the contrary I d
21 matches
Mail list logo
