Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To uns
2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart :
> Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
> the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
Just a note FWIW. Spring WebFlow also uses OGNL.
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli :
> 2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart :
>> Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by
>> the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-)
>
> Just a note FWIW. Spring WebFlow also uses OGNL.
So, OGNL as a TPL project would be the best.
Regards
--
Łu
To be a TLP, you need a bare minimum of 3 active committers,
preferably 6. And you'd need to go via the incubator. Commons is an
easier fit as the committers can be shared with other commons
components, but that still depends on existing commons committers
saying that they'd be willing to help supp
I'm interested and would be more than glad on helping OGNL to join the
Incubator, count on me to prepare the proposal.
I know that this topic should maybe be discussed elsewhere, but before
putting an end to this thread I'd like to ask who's interested,
between Commons devs, on joining? Looks like
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
> Looks like Antonio is interested and
> it would be very nice if he joins.
In fact I am, Tiles also uses OGNL via a separate module.
Once I created a proposal for a subproject for Tiles but it failed:
https://cwiki.apache.org/TILES/dimensionsincubationproposal.html
Howev
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli :
> 2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
>> Looks like Antonio is interested and
>> it would be very nice if he joins.
>
> In fact I am
If it was not clear, I wish to join :-)
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
> Anyone more? :)
You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
>> Anyone more? :)
>
> You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer.
I know it :-) for incubation, being an Apache commiter is a plus when
creating an incubation proposal.
I think you should ask the Struts dev mailing list to see if anyone
el
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 03/03/2011 00:08, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
The recognised standard in the JDK is NPE on invalid null input.
I have never overly liked this, but conform to it for JSR-310/ThreeTen.
I use IAE in other projects which are higher up the stack. Whether
[math]
Thanks, it was :) I'm already on general@, I'll move the discussion there :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> 2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli :
>> 2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi :
>>> Looks like Antonio is intere
On 2011-03-03, Gump wrote:
> [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
> [INFO] -
> [ERROR]
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/commons-vfs-1.x/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/libcheck/FtpCheck.java:[75,46]
> cannot find symbol
> symbol : met
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
One more :-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl
-- Forwarded message --
From: Maurizio Cucchiara
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List , lukasz.len...@gmail.com
Lukasz,
y
I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
is my review:
ArrayUtils.hashCode() has been removed, but it had different
functionality to Arrays.hashCode wrt nested arrays.
Object[] arrayA = new
On 3 March 2011 07:39, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Looking to release 3.0; there's not been a lot of JIRA activity and
> it's 9 months or so since we released the beta.
>
> Downloads:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/
>
> Maven repo entry:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/co
On 3 March 2011 11:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-03-03, Gump wrote:
>
>> [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
>> [INFO] -
>> [ERROR]
>> /srv/gump/public/workspace/commons-vfs-1.x/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/libcheck/FtpChe
Hi,
I have been touched with this mail trail.So frankly speaking I'm not a
hardcore programmer or apache comitter but I'm a software engineering
undergraduate having application development experience in terms of Struts 2
and Spring.I have subscribed this mailing list as I need to get a initiation
Please do not hijack threads, start a new one.
Antonio
2011/3/3 Nuwan Arambage :
> Hi,
>
> I have been touched with this mail trail.So frankly speaking I'm not a
> hardcore programmer or apache comitter but I'm a software engineering
> undergraduate having application development experience in te
Sorry for the mistake.in last mail, he asked for one more. I thought I do
can reply for it. Thanks for your advice and I would be keeping it in mind
as a beginner.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Please do not hijack threads, start a new one.
>
> Antonio
>
> 2011/3/3 N
Any though on splitting the class into two subclasses. One for cav
1.0, the other for 2.0?
Gary
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:52, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thanks Martin and Gary - sorry for my screwup.
>
> Very happy that you found the Caverphone code however Martin :)
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Newton
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List , lukasz.len...@gmail.com
DW: Lukasz Lenart
It seems like it might be a good idea for the ASF to have a performant
(how I hate that word) EL, possible
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Benedict
Date: 2011/3/3
Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons
To: Struts Developers List
Count me in for backup. If someone gets tied up with day work and you need
an extra hand, I will help take over for that person the best I can.
On 3/3/11 6:06 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Thanks, it was :) I'm already on general@, I'll move the discussion there :)
> Simo
It looks to me like if what you guys want to do is incubate OGNL for
eventual home in Commons, you have the support you need. The
non-Commons ASF committers interested ca
On 3/3/11 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> The http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html site seems to
> imply that the latest way to build the zip/tar.gzs is with:
>
> mvn -Prc -DcreateChecksum=true install
>
> Running that, I don't get what I'd expect.
>
> Thought I'd report that. For now
That's an incredible idea Phil, thanks for your kind feedback!
I already started preparing the proposal[1] and sill looking for
Sponsor/Champions/Mentors, I like the idea of OGNL as Commons
Component and we're waiting for feedbacks from Apache Struts, maybe
they're interested too, the we will have
On 3 March 2011 14:23, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/3/11 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> The http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html site seems to
>> imply that the latest way to build the zip/tar.gzs is with:
>>
>> mvn -Prc -DcreateChecksum=true install
>>
>> Running that, I don't get wha
Hi Luc,
Thanks for repeating that you agree with most points, as was the case with
all the changes I had been implementing in "trunk".
The discussion went awry when, because of a single point of disagreement
(about whether a user-only "FunctionEvaluationException" should be defined
in CM), all the
Good feedback, thank you for taking the time to dig in. (I do not have to
time to patch ATM...)
Gary
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anywa
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2011 07:39, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Looking to release 3.0; there's not been a lot of JIRA activity and
>> it's 9 months or so since we released the beta.
>>
>> Downloads:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/
>>
>> Mav
*waves hands* Beta release, ages ago, 3.0, started, ages, Blue Meanies!
That said - excellent feedback, I'll try to go through it tonight.
Cancelling vote; but more feedback from anyone would be excellent.
Hen
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused
Le 03/03/2011 16:34, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
> Thanks for repeating that you agree with most points, as was the case with
> all the changes I had been implementing in "trunk".
> The discussion went awry when, because of a single point of disagreement
> (about whether a user-only "Fun
Hi Henri,
I'm not in the position to review ATM, maybe tonight, I'll let you know!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> *waves hands* Beta release, ages ago, 3.0, started, ages, Blue Meani
I know. Me late. Hope its better late than never...
Stephen
On 3 March 2011 16:04, Henri Yandell wrote:
> *waves hands* Beta release, ages ago, 3.0, started, ages, Blue Meanies!
>
> That said - excellent feedback, I'll try to go through it tonight.
>
> Cancelling vote; but more feedback from anyo
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
> is my review:
[snip]
> ArrayUtils.toArray() javadoc has example code that won't compile
> (missing "new") and also misses <
On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
> Commons-build seems to be Maven1 code - is it still needed?
>
> It does seem to be the source for commons-maven.css and perhaps
> tigris.css, but otherwise does not seem to be useful.
>
> Perhaps the CSS files should be moved to commons-site?
>
I propose t
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
> is my review:
>
[SNIP]
> I don't love the new Pair class. We have an interface based version
>
On 3 March 2011 18:56, Matt Benson wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> I don't love the new Pair class. We have an interface based version
>> here at OpenGamma to allow primitive implementations for performance.
>> I might be able to get our code released if there was interest.
>
> Providing interfaces without cod
Hi Seb,
as you said, maybe they are not useful, BTW if they don't cause any
conflict, I don't see blocking issues, so +1 for the move.
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
>> C
Hi All,
For my needs, I need something akin to a Smalltalk Association and the
current Pair works but it is not how I would like to see it implemented.
I want an interface and a generics-based implementation (like Pair.)
I find it weird to write "Map.Entry myAssoc = ..." but our Pair should
impl
And I now realize that we could consider mutable vs. immutable Pairs
interface Pair (no setters)
interface MutablePair extends Pair (same as Map.Entry)
class BasicPair implements Map.Entry, Pair.
?
Gary
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For my needs, I need som
On 3/3/11 9:24 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> That's an incredible idea Phil, thanks for your kind feedback!
> I already started preparing the proposal[1] and sill looking for
> Sponsor/Champions/Mentors, I like the idea of OGNL as Commons
> Component and we're waiting for feedbacks from Apache Struts
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi.
> >> SingularMatrixException, NonSymmetricMatrixException and the likes are
> >> really tightly bound to linear algebra and could be in the linear
> >> package where they are triggered. They could appear in the signatures of
> >> algorithms in other package that do call linear algebra, but thi
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
>> Commons-build seems to be Maven1 code - is it still needed?
>>
>> It does seem to be the source for commons-maven.css and perhaps
>> tigris.css, but otherwise does not seem to be useful.
>>
>> Perhaps the CSS
On 3 March 2011 23:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
>>> Commons-build seems to be Maven1 code - is it still needed?
>>>
>>> It does seem to be the source for commons-maven.css and perhaps
>>> tigris.css, but otherw
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2011 23:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
Commons-build seems to be Maven1 code - is it still needed?
It does seem to be the source for com
On 4 March 2011 00:49, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 3 March 2011 23:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:13 PM, sebb wrote:
On 26 February 2011 22:39, sebb wrote:
> Commons-build seems to be Maven1 code - is it still ne
Speaking of skins... IMO, this looks beautiful: http://directory.apache.org/
What can't we do something like that?
Gary
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 March 2011 00:49, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> On 3 March 2011 23:42, Nia
Hi,
the recent Gump failures occur because commons-net has removed a
deprecated method that VFS uses. The recommended replacement of the
method is not available in commons-net 2.0 (which trunk depends on) so
in order to adapt to the changes VFS would need to upgdare to
commons-net 2.2.
Would suc
Going through each.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
> is my review:
>
> ArrayUtils.hashCode() has been removed, but it had diff
Is there a need for 1.0?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Any though on splitting the class into two subclasses. One for cav
> 1.0, the other for 2.0?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:52, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Thanks Martin and Gary - sorry for my screwup.
>>
>> Very ha
I am not a SME in Caverphone land but I do see in the code comments
that guide through commenting this line in and that line out to toggle
between both versions. I would never toggle between versions like that
nor would I recommend it. This lead me to propose the two classes. In
addition, it could
Hi Gary/all
I don't know if you're interested, but I realized time ago a light
skin[1] that is already released under ASL2.0, here[2] you can find a
sample, if you are interested on it we could speak about moving it as
new commons-skin...
Just let me know, have a nice day!
Simo
[1] http://code.goo
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the recent Gump failures occur because commons-net has removed a
> deprecated method that VFS uses. The recommended replacement of the
> method is not available in commons-net 2.0 (which trunk depends on) so
> in order to adapt to the changes VFS would
59 matches
Mail list logo
