Hi Henri,
I'm not in the position to review ATM, maybe tonight, I'll let you know!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *waves hands* Beta release, ages ago, 3.0, started, ages, Blue Meanies!
>
> That said - excellent feedback, I'll try to go through it tonight.
>
> Cancelling vote; but more feedback from anyone would be excellent.
>
> Hen
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> 
> wrote:
>> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
>> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
>> is my review:
>>
>> ArrayUtils.hashCode() has been removed, but it had different
>> functionality to Arrays.hashCode wrt nested arrays.
>>
>>        Object[] arrayA = new Object[] {new boolean[] {true, false},
>> new int[] {6, 7}};
>>        Object[] arrayB = new Object[] {new boolean[] {true, false},
>> new int[] {6, 7}};
>>        assertEquals(true, Arrays.hashCode(arrayB) == 
>> Arrays.hashCode(arrayA));
>>
>> I don't love the new Pair class. We have an interface based version
>> here at OpenGamma to allow primitive implementations for performance.
>> I might be able to get our code released if there was interest.
>>
>> ArrayUtils.toArray() javadoc has example code that won't compile
>> (missing "new") and also misses &lt; &gt; in places.
>>
>> Some new methods use a different brace position from the existing
>> code, such as ArrayUtils.toArray(), Validate.matchesPattern(),
>> Validate.exclusiveBetween()...
>>
>> Some new code isn't explicit about null handling, such as
>> AnnotationUtils, CharSequenceUtils, Validate.exclusiveBetween()...
>>
>> Some new methods don't have an @since, such as Validate.notBlank(),
>> Validate.exclusiveBetween()...
>>
>> StringUtils is now an odd mixture of methods that accept a
>> CharSequence and ones that don't. Looking at it, I'd prefer to see
>> CharSequenceUtils added to, and StringUtils methods just deal with
>> Strings (A CharSequence might be mutable, so it has a different set of
>> implications when writing code using it). But if that isn't OK, then
>> it would be better to see everything in StringUtils take a
>> CharSequence.
>>
>> ToStringStyle doesn't have a serialization version ID.
>>
>> While we've moved away from NullArgumentException, I suspect it may be
>> reasonably widely used.
>>
>> DateUtils has added a new MODIFY int enum, rather than using a real
>> enum. Nor has the existing RANGE int enum been converted
>>
>> The JavaVersion name field is not used.
>>
>> ObjectUtils.firstNonNull() differs from Google Guava in that it can
>> return null. This is probably OK, but should be checked.
>>
>> Range is only thread safe if the objects held inside are thread safe 
>> (javadoc).
>>
>> Range.containsRange() might be better named containsAll()
>> Range.overlapsRange might be better named overlaps()
>>
>> Public constants on StringEscapeUtils do not have javadoc.
>>
>> The StringUtils.concat methods duplicate the existing join methods.
>>
>> There are a number of TODOs in the code that might need addressing.
>>
>> The migration guide exceptions section is missing a header.
>>
>>
>> Hope some of this helps (!)
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> On 3 March 2011 07:39, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Looking to release 3.0; there's not been a lot of JIRA activity and
>>> it's 9 months or so since we released the beta.
>>>
>>> Downloads:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/
>>>
>>> Maven repo entry:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/maven/
>>>
>>> Website:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/site/
>>>
>>> Tag:
>>>
>>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC1
>>>
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] -1, because:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to