+1
Oliver
Rory Winston schrieb:
Hi all
you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC_5/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/RE
+1
Rory Winston wrote:
> Hi all
>
> you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC_5/
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston
Rory Winston wrote:
Hi all
you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC_5/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/RELEASE-NOTES.tx
Rory Winston a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC_5/
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/c
Again, you should probably create a different directory for each rc.
That way, you know exactly what you're voting on.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commo
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +-0/1 as you think fit, thanks!
Looks good to me. +1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi all
you know the drill, so I'll keep it short...
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC_5/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Binaries:
http://
Also, it would help to know what Maven command-line was used to build
the release (and on which OS), so it can readily be checked on other
systems / OSes.
The README file could perhaps be updated with this information - at
the moment it only describes how to build the site.
On 04/10/2008, sebb <[
The source and javadoc jars don't have LICENSE and NOTICE files.
The NET_2_0 tag does not agree with the source file archive - the pom
files differ.
Which pom was actually used to generate the release?
On 04/10/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys
>
> I know commons has been dyi
James
Thats a good idea, I'll do that...I'll recut and retag a new release and
send out a new vote thread later on today. I did create a release tag
which I had been reusing, but I think in retrospect I should have just
created more RC tags.
Thanks
Rory
James Carman wrote:
How about sendin
How about sending out a fresh [vote] thread email again? I don't tend
to keep stuff around and it's hard to know what we're voting on when
new versions of the rc keep getting uploaded. If you're cutting a new
release candidate, I'd say you should upload it, but don't overwrite
what you put out th
Guys
I know commons has been dying a slow death due to inactivity, but
binding votes (either +-1) would be appreciated. I want to get this out
finally...
Rory Winston wrote:
Ah, yes, you're right -Prc does actually generate them
automatically. That explains the discrepancy.
I have uplo
Ah, yes, you're right -Prc does actually generate them
automatically. That explains the discrepancy.
I have uploaded the distribution again, based on the build with a -Prc
switch. It's exactly the same, just the javadoc/src jar is generated by
the parent pom automagically.
James Carman w
Does Net's pom not extend the proper parent pom? For Proxy, most of
the proper build stuff was taken care of for me by the hard work that
others put into the parent pom (thanks to those folks). Did you try
using the "rc" profile when cutting your release candidates?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:23 A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/1/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some
>> plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the
>> signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javadocs
>> containing
Shouldn't the Parent pom take care of this?
On 10/1/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some
> plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the
> signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javad
Thanks for the feedback. I have changed the pom (needed to add some
plugins) to generate sources and javadoc jars. I have uploaded the
signed jars to the site. I dont see an issue with the javadocs
containing the examples classes (its always been like that).
Rory
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi
Hi Rory,
here comes part II, I try to build the jar from the src package with my
compiler zoo.
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Rory,
>
> - the clirr report compares 2.0 against 1.4.1 instead of 1.5.0.
> - the changes report is missing some information in the release history.
> This is not your fault,
On 10/1/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
> >
> > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
> >
> > ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
> >
>
> But is it correct?
>
> If not, will
On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
>
> META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
>
> ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
>
But is it correct?
If not, will the incorrect location cause any problems for Maven?
If the ent
Hi Rory,
- the clirr report compares 2.0 against 1.4.1 instead of 1.5.0.
- the changes report is missing some information in the release history. This
is not your fault, but it would be nice anyway to provide complete infos.
- the javadoc contains the classes in the example packages.
Nothing of
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done!
Great, +1 on releasing.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
You're right. You can disable this behavior with the following configuration:
maven-jar-plugin
2.2
false
Done!
Thanks
Rory
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, sorry, I just realised that I have an older key in my key list which
must be the default for signing. I've uploaded it to pgp.mit.edu and I will
add it to the appropriate
Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
sebb wrote:
On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for
relea
On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for
> release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following changes:
>
> * Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
> * Put LICENSE.tx
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I just realised that I have an older key in my key list which
> must be the default for signing. I've uploaded it to pgp.mit.edu and I will
> add it to the appropriate KEYS file as well.
Now find it at pgp.mit.
Yes, sorry, I just realised that I have an older key in my key list
which must be the default for signing. I've uploaded it to pgp.mit.edu
and I will add it to the appropriate KEYS file as well.
Rory
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
I still can't seem to find the key used for signing the artifacts
(B6E5C0E2)., neither in:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
nor in:
https://svn.apache.or
+1
Artifacts look good, build works fine under JDK 1.6.
One nit: I think the release notes should be contained at least in the
binary distribution. And they should start with a short paragraph giving
an introduction into what the component does. Well, I leave the decision
to you and do not ve
Hi all
After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate
for release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following
changes:
* Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
* Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
* Fixed some oddi
Thanks Niklas!
Cheers
Rory
On 8 Apr 2008, at 08:35, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test
failures:
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTes
Hi
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
> tags and branches, but always get test failures.
Things have improved significantly on the 2.0 branch, thanks! Now I'm
just getting one fai
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How many CPUs does the system have?
It's a dual core laptop.
> I raised JIRA NET-213 to record the bug you reported.
Thanks!
> Do you see any problem with always using the default platform encoding
> when converting the line
On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
> > >
> >
> > which J
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
> >
>
> which JVM are you using for this?
>
> I don't see the error in 1.5.0 or 1.6.0 (Sun/
On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
>
which JVM are you using for this?
I don't see the error in 1.5.0 or 1.6.0 (Sun/WinXP).
> Tests in error:
> testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetC
My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionRenegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
trunk (Java 1.3+)
and
branches/NET_2_0 (Java 1.5)
have the most recent fixes.
On 07/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
> tags and branches, but always get test failures. Here's the summaries
>
Hi
>From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
tags and branches, but always get test failures. Here's the summaries
and the relevant surefire reports are attached.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC3/
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.
Sorry, assumed it was a recent change.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sigh. here it is - its been in there for a long time.
>
>
> Added an ant target to the Maven build to generate an FTP-only jar file,
> for clients who wish to use only FTP-based functionality.
>
>
sigh. here it is - its been in there for a long time.
Added an ant target to the Maven build to generate an FTP-only jar file,
for clients who wish to use only FTP-based functionality.
sebb wrote:
Just did - I'm none the wiser.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
look
Just did - I'm none the wiser.
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> look in the changes.
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
> > > maintenance rele
look in the changes.
sebb wrote:
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/c
On 07/04/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
> maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html
>
> T
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0 RC3. This is a
maintenance release. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-
That's great, thanks James!
James Carman wrote:
On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anybody know if it is possible to generate a release notes skeleton
automatically from JIRA?
Sure. When you click "Browse Project" and you select Net (if it's not
already selected
On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know if it is possible to generate a release notes skeleton
> automatically from JIRA?
Sure. When you click "Browse Project" and you select Net (if it's not
already selected), there's a "Release Notes" link under "All
Projects."
Does anybody know if it is possible to generate a release notes skeleton
automatically from JIRA?
Rory
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I added the clirr report and it shows quite a few incompatible changes
from the 1.4.1 release - this should be at least highlighted in
release notes.
Niall
On Mon, Ma
On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
> release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
> JDK 1.5+.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net
On 04/03/2008, Jeffrey Brekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting test failures, are they known issues?
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
>
> testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
>
> testOptionRenegotiati
I'm getting test failures, are they known issues?
Tests in error:
testInitial(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionNegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testOptionRenegotiation(org.apache.commons.net.telnet.TelnetClientTest)
testNotification(o
On 03/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
> > release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
> > JDK 1.5+.
> >
> >
On 02/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
> release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
> JDK 1.5+.
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons
I added the clirr report and it shows quite a few incompatible changes
from the 1.4.1 release - this should be at least highlighted in
release notes.
Niall
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 from me because the source distro includes a "commons-net-2.
-1 from me because the source distro includes a "commons-net-2.0"
folder (in src) which looks like a copy of the "target" folder
containing the generated site, classes, distros etc. Not sure how this
got generated because running the assembly target for me generated the
source distro correctly. Als
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 2.0. This release is a major new
release with a huge number of changes and fixes. This release requires
JDK 1.5+.
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html#a2.0
The RC deployment is here:
http:/
57 matches
Mail list logo
