Hi Rory, - the clirr report compares 2.0 against 1.4.1 instead of 1.5.0. - the changes report is missing some information in the release history. This is not your fault, but it would be nice anyway to provide complete infos. - the javadoc contains the classes in the example packages.
Nothing of this is a real -1, however if you have to make a new release ... ;-) I'll have a look at the binaries this evening before I complete voting. - Jörg Rory Winston schrieb: > Hi all > > After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate > for release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the > following changes: > > * Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar > * Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar > * Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what > Maven's xdoc processor was doing here) > * Updated the version number > * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc > > As usual, the files are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/ > > Please vote as you feel appropriate! > Thanks > > Rory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
