Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
sebb wrote:
On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for
release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following changes:
* Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
* Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
* Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what Maven's
xdoc processor was doing here)
* Updated the version number
* Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
As usual, the files are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/
The binary archive contains the Javadocs for the examples.
Seems no point as the example source is not present, but not a blocker.
The binary archive contains pom.properties and pom.xml in a rather odd
directory:
META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
Is that correct?
Please vote as you feel appropriate!
Thanks
Rory
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
