+1

Artifacts look good, build works fine under JDK 1.6.

One nit: I think the release notes should be contained at least in the binary distribution. And they should start with a short paragraph giving an introduction into what the component does. Well, I leave the decision to you and do not veto the release because of this.

Oliver

Rory Winston schrieb:
Hi all

After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following changes:

* Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
* Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
* Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what Maven's xdoc processor was doing here)
* Updated the version number
* Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc

As usual, the files are here:

http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/

Please vote as you feel appropriate!
Thanks

Rory

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to