; I upgraded from Commons IO 2.15.1 to 2.16.1 yesterday and found a small
> change in the behavior of Commons FileUpload when uploading and processing
> empty files. The effect is visible only when passing a negative value as
> file size threshold to Commons FileUpload. Here is a small ext
nd a small change
in the behavior of Commons FileUpload when uploading and processing empty
files. The effect is visible only when passing a negative value as file size
threshold to Commons FileUpload. Here is a small extract from the Javadoc of
Commons FileUpload, class `DefaultFileItemFactor
The Apache Commons FileUpload team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2.
The Apache Commons FileUpload component provides a simple yet flexible means of
adding support for multipart file upload functionality to Servlets and web
applications. This version
t;
> > Builds on java 11, 17, and 21.
> >
> > All looks good, signatures, reports, site and RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> > Happy Holidays,
> > -Rob
> >
> > > On Dec 24, 2023, at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > We have fixed a few bugs
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> > Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release
> > Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2.
> >
> > Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for review here:
&
+1
Builds on java 11, 17, and 21.
All looks good, signatures, reports, site and RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Happy Holidays,
-Rob
> On Dec 24, 2023, at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 was re
4 Dec 2023 at 20:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for review her
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2.
Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons
ll or not?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Jeremias
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Gary Gregory
> > > > > Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
> > >
s well or not?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jeremias
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Gary Gregory
> > > > Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
> > > > To:
?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Jeremias
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Gary Gregory
> > > Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
> > > To: Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache
NVALID wrote:
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> > does that include Milestone releases as well or not?
> >
> > Regards
> > Jeremias
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gary Gregory
> > Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
> > To: Commons D
wrote:
> > >
> > > FTR:
> > >
> > > Note that this release uses different Maven coordinates:
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons
> > > commons-fileupload2
> > > 2.0.0-M2-SNAPSHOT
> > >
> > > The
pache.commons
> > commons-fileupload2
> > 2.0.0-M2-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > The previous release (1.5) used:
> >
> > commons-fileupload
> > commons-fileupload
> > 1.5
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 17:28,
> wrote:
> >
:
>
> FTR:
>
> Note that this release uses different Maven coordinates:
>
> org.apache.commons
> commons-fileupload2
> 2.0.0-M2-SNAPSHOT
>
> The previous release (1.5) used:
>
> commons-fileupload
> commons-fileupload
> 1.5
>
> On Fri, 21
FTR:
Note that this release uses different Maven coordinates:
org.apache.commons
commons-fileupload2
2.0.0-M2-SNAPSHOT
The previous release (1.5) used:
commons-fileupload
commons-fileupload
1.5
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 17:28, wrote:
>
> Hello Gary,
>
> does that inclu
legacy services.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, 9:15 AM James Reeves
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd very much prefer 11, unless 17 is necessary. I have a library
> that
> > > > currently depends on FileUpload 1.5, and only requires J
> > Hello!
> >
> > I currently maintain the HTTP server library (Ring) for the Clojure
> > programming language, which is a functional lisp for the JVM. In order to
> > parse multipart requests, I lean on FileUpload. In the past that's been
> > somewhat problem
e kept on the oldest safe (LTS) version forever, IMHO,
> to
> > avoid stranding legacy services.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, 9:15 AM James Reeves
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd very much prefer 11, unless 17 is necessary. I have a library that
> > &g
ess 17 is necessary. I have a library that
> > currently depends on FileUpload 1.5, and only requires Java 8. For
> various
> > reasons, I've been very conservative with the required Java version. I
> was
> > already planning to make the jump to Java 11, so if FileUpload 2
Libraries should be kept on the oldest safe (LTS) version forever, IMHO, to
avoid stranding legacy services.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, 9:15 AM James Reeves wrote:
> I'd very much prefer 11, unless 17 is necessary. I have a library that
> currently depends on FileUpload 1.5, and only requ
For now git master is on Java 11. I plan on releasing 2.0.0-M2 within a
couple of weeks.
Gary
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, 12:15 PM James Reeves wrote:
> I'd very much prefer 11, unless 17 is necessary. I have a library that
> currently depends on FileUpload 1.5, and only requires Java 8.
, which is a functional lisp for the JVM. In order to
> parse multipart requests, I lean on FileUpload. In the past that's been
> somewhat problematic, as 1.x had a hard dependency on Java servlets, so I
> was happy to see that for 2.0.0, the core module of FileUpload has no such
&
Hello!
I currently maintain the HTTP server library (Ring) for the Clojure programming
language, which is a functional lisp for the JVM. In order to parse multipart
requests, I lean on FileUpload. In the past that's been somewhat problematic,
as 1.x had a hard dependency on Java servlets,
I'd very much prefer 11, unless 17 is necessary. I have a library that
currently depends on FileUpload 1.5, and only requires Java 8. For various
reasons, I've been very conservative with the required Java version. I was
already planning to make the jump to Java 11, so if FileUpload 2
juil. 2023, 18:40, Glavo a écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1 for Java 17.
> > > >
> > > > Glavo
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory <
> garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > &
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > > > requirements.
> > > >
> > > > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to
>
> > > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > > requirements.
> > >
> > > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if
> not
> > > 17.
> > >
> > > If y
18:40, Glavo a écrit :
> +1 for Java 17.
>
> Glavo
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > requirements.
> >
> > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bump
---
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1
>
> [**EXTERNAL E-MAIL**]
>
> All releases go to MC.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, 10:47
> wrote:
+1 for Java 17.
Glavo
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> requirements.
>
> I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if not
> 17.
>
> If you are going to as
23 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> requirements.
> >>
> >> I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 1
orm
>> requirements.
>>
>> I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if not 17.
>>
>> If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
>> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk)
>>
&
Hello Gary,
does that include Milestone releases as well or not?
Regards
Jeremias
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 17:08
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1
[**EXTERNAL E-MAIL**]
All releases go to
at 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> requirements.
>
> I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if not 17.
>
> If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxn
All releases go to MC.
Gary
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, 10:47
wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> are you releasing the Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 to Maven Central
> as well?
> That would make the testing easier.
>
> Regards
> Jeremias
>
> -Original Message
+1 for java17 :)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 21:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2023 16:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > requirements.
> >
> > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from
On 21/07/2023 16:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform requirements.
I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if not 17.
+1 for Java 17
Mark
If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
(
Hello Gary,
are you releasing the Apache Commons FileUpload 2.0.0-M1 to Maven Central as
well?
That would make the testing easier.
Regards
Jeremias
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023 15:43
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache
Hello Gary,
Java 11 should be fine.
We need FileUpload 2.0, because we want to upgrade to Spring Boot 3.0 which
requires Java 17 and uses JakartaEE:
https://github.com/mercedes-benz/sechub/issues/797
Regards
Jeremias
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2023
Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform requirements.
I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if not 17.
If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
(https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk)
ease with new features, cleaned-up interfaces, and
> updated dependencies is much appreciated!
> I also learned from the recent discussion whether FileUpload is still a
> good idea [1].
>
> > The Apache Commons FileUpload Parent team is pleased to announce the
> > release of Apac
Hi Gary!
Thank you for this release and thanks to all the diligent contributors!
Having a new release with new features, cleaned-up interfaces, and
updated dependencies is much appreciated!
I also learned from the recent discussion whether FileUpload is still a
good idea [1].
> The Apa
The Apache Commons FileUpload Parent team is pleased to announce the
release of Apache Commons FileUpload Parent 2.0.0-M1.
The Apache Commons FileUpload component provides a simple yet flexible
means of adding support for multipart file upload functionality to
servlets and web applications. This
wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
> > into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy javax
> > namespaces, so I would like to release Apache Commons FileUpload
> > 2.0.0-M1.
&g
My +1.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:57 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
> into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy javax
> namespaces, so I would like to release Apache Commons
n the coverage issues.
Send it! Thanks for all the great work!
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Jul 16, 2023, at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
> into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy j
+1
Thanks Gary!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> Bruno
>
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 13:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
> > into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy javax
> > namespaces, so I would li
issues were found.
Site reports look OK.
Thanks
Bruno
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 13:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
> into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy javax
> namespaces, so I wou
Hi All,
This is the first milestone release for 2.0.0 which splits FileUpload
into a multi-module project to support the Jakarta and legacy javax
namespaces, so I would like to release Apache Commons FileUpload
2.0.0-M1.
The previous release was Apache Commons FileUpload 1.5 (javax only
Hello Gary,
Any updates? We would really appreciate a release of FileUpload 2.0.0-M1.
Best regards
Jeremias
On 2023/07/04 09:31:37 Gary Gregory wrote:
> There are no blockers, just life, I'll try to get to it this week.
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 00:54 Dennis Kieselho
Hello Gary,
awesome, looking forward to the release.
Jeremias
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2023 11:33
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Release Commons Fileupload 1.4.1?
I should have a candidate by the end of the weekend or sooner
I should have a candidate by the end of the weekend or sooner.
Gary
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, 05:30
wrote:
> Hello Gary,
> Any updates? We would really appreciate a release of FileUpload 2.0.0-M1.
> Best regards
> Jeremias
>
> On 2023/06/16 14:49:18 Gary Gregory wrote:
> &
Hello Gary,
Any updates? We would really appreciate a release of FileUpload 2.0.0-M1.
Best regards
Jeremias
On 2023/06/16 14:49:18 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We are not ready but are working diligently towards a 2.0.0-M1 release,
> probably within the next month or so.
>
> Gary
>
&
There are no blockers, just life, I'll try to get to it this week.
Gary
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 00:54 Dennis Kieselhorst wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> what's blocking the 2.0.0-M1 release? Can I help implementing it?
>
> Best,
> Dennis
>
> --
Hi Gary,
what's blocking the 2.0.0-M1 release? Can I help implementing it?
Best,
Dennis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
We are not ready but are working diligently towards a 2.0.0-M1 release,
probably within the next month or so.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 01:15 Dennis Kieselhorst wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> successfully tested the latest SNAPSHOT with the new module structure
> yesterday. Please release it.
>
> Thank
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 22:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Let me take a look at this, but you should really be using a file item
> factory to create file items...
Thanks a million!
Here is the original code:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/wicket-9.x/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket
Let me take a look at this, but you should really be using a file item
factory to create file items...
Gary
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 09:06 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 19:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > A FileItemHeadersImpl is created by calling
> > AbstractFileUpload#newFile
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 19:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> A FileItemHeadersImpl is created by calling
> AbstractFileUpload#newFileItemHeaders()
At Apache Wicket we are implementing FileItem and need a way to create
FileItemHeaders
AbstractFileUpload#newFileItemHeaders() is not static :(((
>
> Gary
>
A FileItemHeadersImpl is created by calling
AbstractFileUpload#newFileItemHeaders()
Gary
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 06:50 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> It seems I have API related question:
>
> FileItemHeadersImpl is not public anymore :((
> How it can be created? :)))
>
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 17:28,
It seems I have API related question:
FileItemHeadersImpl is not public anymore :((
How it can be created? :)))
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 17:28, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> It seems new jar file missing `Automatic-Module-Name` would it be
> possible to add it? :)
>
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 17:10, M
It seems new jar file missing `Automatic-Module-Name` would it be
possible to add it? :)
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 17:10, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 16:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Glad to hear that your testing went well.
> >
> > Some of the documentation needs to be rew
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 16:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Glad to hear that your testing went well.
>
> Some of the documentation needs to be rewritten, so I'll look at that next
> unless someone else gets to it first.
>
> I plan on creating a release candidate for a 2.0.0-beta1 or 2.0.0-M1 within
> a
Glad to hear that your testing went well.
Some of the documentation needs to be rewritten, so I'll look at that next
unless someone else gets to it first.
I plan on creating a release candidate for a 2.0.0-beta1 or 2.0.0-M1 within
a week or so. Since this is a major release I think it is importan
Hi Gary,
successfully tested the latest SNAPSHOT with the new module structure
yesterday. Please release it.
Thanks,
Dennis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@
I want release commons-io again and then I should be able to get to
fileupload 2, in the meantime, please test git master.
Gary
On Wed, May 31, 2023, 11:15 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> are there any news on release? :)
>
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 19:18, Maxim Solo
; >>
>> > >> Within a couple of weeks. There is a little more work up to do and
>> > Commons
>> > >> IO is next on my list.
>> > >>
>> > >> Gary
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023, 21:54 Maxim Solodovni
+1
Thanks Gary, it will be a cleaner solution.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
It's not hard, it's just a touch tedious, I'll get to it this weekend.
Gary
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 10:27 Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> +1 if it is not too hard to do it.
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 4:22 pm Gary Gregory, wrote:
>
> > In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jaka
+1 if it is not too hard to do it.
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 4:22 pm Gary Gregory, wrote:
> In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
> servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
> modules for these and for portlets, such that all their depend
+1 :)
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 21:22 Gary Gregory wrote:
> In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
> servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
> modules for these and for portlets, such that all their de
In the 2.0 snapshot code in git master, we support both javax and Jakarta
servers, in different packages. I am thinking we should create maven
modules for these and for portlets, such that all their dependencies are
non-optional.
Thoughts?
Gary
; > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023, 19:38 Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Within a couple of weeks. There is a little more work up to do and
> > Commons
> > >> IO is next on my list.
> > >>
> > >> Gary
> > >>
> >
on my list.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023, 21:54 Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Gary,
> >> >
> >> > I saw new commits at the commons-fileupload repo, but no release :(
> >> > Can you please
s a little more work up to do and Commons
>> IO is next on my list.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023, 21:54 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Gary,
>> >
>> > I saw new commits at the commons-fileupload repo, but no release :(
>>
:
>
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> > I saw new commits at the commons-fileupload repo, but no release :(
> > Can you please share new ETA for the 2.0 release? :)
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 10:12, Maxim Solodovnik
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank
Within a couple of weeks. There is a little more work up to do and Commons
IO is next on my list.
Gary
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023, 21:54 Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> I saw new commits at the commons-fileupload repo, but no release :(
> Can you please share new ETA for the
Hello Gary,
I saw new commits at the commons-fileupload repo, but no release :(
Can you please share new ETA for the 2.0 release? :)
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 10:12, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Thanks a million! :)
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 01:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
>
7 17:30:35 Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > > > The next release will be 2.0 which will hopefully happen Q1 2023.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022, 11:28 Dennis Kieselhorst
> > wrote:
8 Dennis Kieselhorst
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well this is the change I'm particularly interested in to have
> clean
> > > > > transitive dependencies but looking at the commit logs other useful
> > > > > things happened as well. The la
> > >
> > > > Well this is the change I'm particularly interested in to have clean
> > > > transitive dependencies but looking at the commit logs other useful
> > > > things happened as well. The last release happened in 2019. I
> > unde
tive dependencies but looking at the commit logs other useful
> > > things happened as well. The last release happened in 2019. I
> understand
> > > though that fileupload is implemented differently nowadays and
> > > maintaining this project no longer is a priority.
&
Well this is the change I'm particularly interested in to have clean
> > transitive dependencies but looking at the commit logs other useful
> > things happened as well. The last release happened in 2019. I understand
> > though that fileupload is implemented differently nowa
This problem has been filed in 2021 but commons-fileupload deferring the fix to
commons-io.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-338
There has been no fix from io. Can this change be reverted in fileupload?
Regards,
From: Ph. Dinh
Sent: Monday
Hi,
When uploading a file on Windows, IOException: Failed to delete original file
is thrown.
This problem happens only on Windows OS when the uploading file is written to
disk.
The DiskFileItem.write(File) is updated in commons-fileupload 1.4. It utilizes
the
CVE-2023-24998 Apache Commons FileUpload - DoS with excessive parts
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache Commons FileUpload 1.0-beta-1 to 1.4
Description:
Apache Commons FileUpload before 1.5 does not limit the number of
request parts to be
+1, and thanks for the work here. Much appreciation!
-Rob
> On Feb 9, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Ping. One more PMC member vote required.
>
> Mark
>
> On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancemen
Here's my +1. Thanks for your work!
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:39 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Ping. One more PMC member vote required.
>
> Mark
>
> On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since
> > File
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Commons FileUpload 1.5.
The Commons FileUpload software library makes it easy to add
robust, high-performance, file upload capability to your servlets
and web applications.
Source and binary distributions are available for
The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: kinow, markt, ggregory
No other votes were cast.
The vote therefore passes.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo
ing to read POM
org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.pull.XmlPullParserException: UTF-8 BOM
plus xml decl of ISO-8859-1 is incompatible (position: START_DOCUMENT
seen wrote:
>
> Ping. One more PMC member vote required.
>
> Mark
>
> On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added some
Will try to get to today.
-Rob
> On Feb 9, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Ping. One more PMC member vote required.
>
> Mark
>
> On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since FileUpload
>
Ping. One more PMC member vote required.
Mark
On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since
FileUpload 1.4 was released, so I would like to release FileUpload 1.5.
FileUpload 1.5 RC1 is available for review here:
https
On 01/02/2023 12:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now,
i.e. sometime after 13:00 UTC 4 Feb 2023
[X] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose
ts look OK. No
blockers for
this release, IMO.
Checked NOTICE and RELEASE-NOTES files, both look OK.
Inspected signatures, and contents of maven & dist files. Found no issues.
Thanks for RM'ing!
-Bruno
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 13:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and
We have fixed a few bugs and added some small enhancements since
FileUpload 1.4 was released, so I would like to release FileUpload 1.5.
FileUpload 1.5 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/fileupload/1.5-RC1
(svn revision 59794)
The tag is here
On 03/01/2023 09:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/12/2022 18:54, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 12:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
- Delete the b2_0 branch
- Move the head of the b1_4 branch to the 1.4 tag
- Update the b1_4 branch for development of 1.4.1
(or should that be 1.5 and s
On 15/12/2022 18:54, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 12:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
- Delete the b2_0 branch
- Move the head of the b1_4 branch to the 1.4 tag
- Update the b1_4 branch for development of 1.4.1
(or should that be 1.5 and start a new branch?)
- Back-port my recent
1 - 100 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
