Java 21 is not GA.

Gary

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023, 04:48 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd say compile low and run high.
> So unless there is really something you need from Java 17 or 21, why not
> compiling lower?
>
> It would open the release to be used more widely in my opinion.
>
> Now I agree that making sure it runs on java 17 and 21 at least is great.
>
> Le ven. 21 juil. 2023, 18:40, Glavo <zjx001...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > +1 for Java 17.
> >
> > Glavo
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform
> > > requirements.
> > >
> > > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if
> not
> > > 17.
> > >
> > > If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread
> > > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk)
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to