+1 for java 17, requirement is java 21 as the new requirement for jakartaee, anything in between is already migrated or will not be migrated so 17 seems already low to me.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le ven. 21 juil. 2023 à 18:28, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > From a spec view: > > Baseline for Jakarta EE 10 would be Java 11. Jakarta EE 9 is still Java 8 > (namespace Change only) > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am 21. Juli 2023 18:10:48 MESZ schrieb Elliotte Rusty Harold < > elh...@ibiblio.org>: > >Absolutely not Java 17. There are really big companies still on Java > >11, and I have no idea how many smaller ones. > > > >There are many still on Java 8. > > > >Unless you actually **need** something from Java 11+ I wouldn't bother. > > > >On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform > requirements. > >> > >> I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if > not 17. > >> > >> If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread > >> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk) > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > > > > >-- > >Elliotte Rusty Harold > >elh...@ibiblio.org > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >
