Le sam. 22 juil. 2023 à 11:00, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Java 21 is not GA. > FU neither and calendar looks like it can match. Main pro being to move to a more reactive programming at some point which could justify a 2.0 IMHO. > Gary > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023, 04:48 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd say compile low and run high. > > So unless there is really something you need from Java 17 or 21, why not > > compiling lower? > > > > It would open the release to be used more widely in my opinion. > > > > Now I agree that making sure it runs on java 17 and 21 at least is great. > > > > Le ven. 21 juil. 2023, 18:40, Glavo <zjx001...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > +1 for Java 17. > > > > > > Glavo > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:18 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Now that 2.0.0-M1 is out the door, let's talk about Java platform > > > > requirements. > > > > > > > > I propose that for 2.0.0, FileUpload be bumped from Java 8 to 11, if > > not > > > > 17. > > > > > > > > If you are going to ask why, see my reply in the [pool] thread > > > > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngyrssxndklltzkoqfqx4n780h4b5vwk) > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
