e have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/co
This vote passes with the following binding +1 votes:
- Piotr P. Karwasz (ppkarwasz)
- Gary Gregory (ggregory)
- Phil Steitz (psteitz)
TY all,
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 9:27 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixe
I've checked:
* commons-beanutils-2.0.0-M2-RC1 corresponds to
5d09ef79376511519b0b4aafcb5bbe79a70bd3c7
* sha512 of the 2 source archives match
dca62e297ac5b87caaf63c6793764a8ce743e2539766dd59588ab319d5051a5adaa145aba584c38d0fa0624e481d4d0584629bf88f56785613fb87bf4b7bc4b
probably be dropped or the replace second line
with ${developmentTeam} in the template.
Phil
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 6:28 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> Bean
ever, there is a typo in the name of the folder: it is currently
> called `1.10.1-RC1` instead of `1.11.0-RC1`.
Oops, committed revision 77120, TY Piotr.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancem
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 25.05.2025 21:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
> >> It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
> >> 1.11.0 (RC1) was
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 21:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
>> It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
>> 1.11.0 (RC1) was unintentionally removed in revision 77117.
>>
>> Fortunately, it's s
My +1
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2 RC
My +1
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 9:27 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 based on RC1
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 1.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Common
Note that the svn commit for the dev files is now 77119 due to trying
to release two versions simultaneously.
Gary
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:18 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I woul
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 25.05.2025 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.11.0-RC1
> &g
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 16:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 24 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 at 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 24 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because.
Hi Gary,
On 25.05.2025 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.11.0-RC1
> (svn revision 77116)
It looks like the release candidate for Apache Commons BeanUtils
1.11.0
+1 non binding Tested this in my local code and all is working well.
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:19 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2.
Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils
[VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 based on RC1
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
BeanUtils 1.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0.
Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https
drawbacks as exemplified by the issue filed by this user.
There is also the general issue that it would be nice to publish a site for
the latest published version and the snapshot version. Plus the more for
components that currently supports more than one major release lines,
for example, BeanUtils.
There
The Beanutils Download Page has a broken link to version 2.0.0-M2, which
has NOT been released yet (last release was 2.0.0-M1).
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-beanutils/download_beanutils.cgi
Also dependency page is showing M2 SNAPSHOT as the version
https://commons.apache.org
This release vote passes with the following +1 votes:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory, binding)
- melloware...@gmail.com (non-binding)
- Henri Biestro (binding, henrib)
- Piotr P. Karwasz (binding, pkarwasz)
TY all,
Gary
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:08 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 31.01
Hi Gary,
On 31.01.2025 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
I che
> (no coverage by default ?)
Hm, that's annoying I"ll see about fixing that post-release.
Gary
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:15 AM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> My [+1]
>
> Builds &tests ok, reproductible build check, reports ok (no coverage by
> default ?), changes ok.
>
> Checked on:
> Apache Maven
My [+1]
Builds &tests ok, reproductible build check, reports ok (no coverage by default
?), changes ok.
Checked on:
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c365c560670ad80f63)
Maven home: /Users/hbiestro/Java/apache-maven-3.8.6
Java version: 21.0.3, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime:
/Libr
My non-binding +1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:36 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> My +1
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:34 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> > BeanUtils 1.10.0 was release
My +1
Gary
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:34 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> BeanUtils 1.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.10.1.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.1 RC1 is av
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
BeanUtils 1.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons BeanUtils 1.10.1.
Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.1 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.10.1-RC1
; > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
> > > > > of Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Comm
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 4:00 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 17:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:14 PM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
[This message contains the correct download link]
The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0.
Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
around reflection and introspection.
This is a maintenance release and
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 17:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:14 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
>
[The original announcement was missing the download link at the bottom
of this message]
The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1.
Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
around reflection and
browse/LEGAL-682?focusedCommentId=17914173&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17914173
>
> https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-beanutils/download_ beanutils.cgi
>
> The announce email must link to the download page (i.e. the one with
>
etabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17914173
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-beanutils/download_ beanutils.cgi
The announce email must link to the download page (i.e. the one with
the KEYS, sig and hashes etc)
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:13 PM sebb wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:14 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
> > of Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0
> >
> > Apache Commons BeanUtils provides
3 PM sebb wrote:
>
> Where is the link to the download page?
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 19:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
> > of Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1
> >
> > Apache Commons Bea
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 13:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
> of Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
> around reflection and introspection.
>
&g
Where is the link to the download page?
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 19:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
> of Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
>
The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1
Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
around reflection and introspection.
This major release requires Java 8 and lives in the new package
The Apache Commons BeanUtils team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0
Apache Commons BeanUtils provides an easy-to-use but flexible wrapper
around reflection and introspection.
This is a maintenance release and requires Java 8.
Historical list of changes:
https
This vote passes with the following +1 votes:
- Melloware Inc (non-binding)
- Xeno Amess (non-binding)
- Gary Gregory (ggregory, binding)
- Arnout Engelen (engelen, binding)
- Henri Biestro (henrib, binding)
TY all,
Gary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 12:04 PM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> [+1]
>
> With a l
This vote passes with the following +1 votes:
- Gary Gregory (ggregory, binding)
- Melloware Inc (non-binding)
- Rob Tompkins (chtompki, binding)
- Henri Biestro (henrib, binding)
TY all,
Gary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 12:05 PM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> [+1]
>
> With a little caveat that's probably
Hi Henri:
Right, I plan on publishing 1.x, then 2.x, which will overwrite it,
then updating master (2.0.1-SNAPSHOT) so that the site contains the
1.x docs.
Gary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 12:05 PM Henri Biestro wrote:
>
> [+1]
>
> With a little caveat that's probably due to segregating building 1.x
[+1]
With a little caveat that's probably due to segregating building 1.x and 2.x,
the site release notes, changes and API links aren't completely proper.
Built from git clone with:
mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
Using:
mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25a
[+1]
With a little caveat that's probably due to segregating building 1.x and 2.x,
the site release notes, changes and API links aren't proper.
Built from git clone with:
mvn clean install site -s "$HOME/.m2/commons-settings.xml"
Using:
mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.8.6 (84538c9988a25aec085021c36
+1 All looks good.
> On Dec 26, 2024, at 3:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed one important bug and added minor enhancements since Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.9.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons Be
My non-binding +1
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:44 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Note that:
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.10.0-RC1
> (svn
> revision 73866)
>
> should be revisi
Note that:
Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/1.10.0-RC1 (svn
revision 73866)
should be revision 73999.
TY,
Gary
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 3:27 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed one important
I have:
* checked out git tag commons-beanutils-2.0.0-M1-RC1
* verified it corresponds to e4eb3568ab6076585cb51b4a6d3f32
9ae04d2efb
* downloaded source zip and tgz
* verified the hashes match
My +1
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 8:15 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> This is a major new version, under the beanutils2 package name instead of
> beanutils.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanuti
+1 (wow it finally out? surprised
获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2024 9:37:25 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Cc: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.
My non binding +1
Melloware
@melloware on GitHub
> On Dec 26, 2024, at 8:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This is a major new version, under the beanutils2 package name instead of
> beanutils.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 RC1 is available for review here:
>ht
This is a major new version, under the beanutils2 package name instead of
beanutils.
Apache Commons BeanUtils 2.0.0-M1 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/2.0.0-M1-RC1
(svn revision 73870)
The Git tag commons-beanutils-2.0.0-M1-RC1
My +1
Gary
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 3:27 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed one important bug and added minor enhancements since Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.9.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0 R
We have fixed one important bug and added minor enhancements since Apache
Commons BeanUtils 1.9.4 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0.
Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons
Nice! Thank you Mark.
Gary
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024, 2:01 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/11/2024 18:53, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > markt pushed a commit to branch 1.X
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/co
On 26/11/2024 18:53, ma...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 1.X
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-beanutils.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/1.X by this push:
Gary,
I appreciate all the work you put into the various Apache Commons projects, so
I hope this does not sound ungrateful. I would like to ask what can be done to
increase the urgency for releasing BeanUtils 2.0. Due to requirements from our
public sector customers, we need be STIG compliant
+1 for Java 8 as well. Unless there is a compelling feature in Java 11+
that could make a difference for beanutils from a user point of view.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 25/09/2024 à 21:45, Josh Fenlason a écrit :
While some might have some preferences on more recent Java versions, I haven't
see
tions to Java 8. Staying on Java 8 shouldn't really
> > cause issues for anyone. Can we settle on Java 8 so this isn't an
> > impediment to getting a new BeanUtils 2.0 release out the door?
> > Josh.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Xeno Amess
Sounds good. I'll keep an eye out for it.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 3:22 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organiz
--
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 2:52 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> links or open attac
Excellent, thanks for that encouraging update! Is there anything I can assist
with?
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 2:52 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
CAUTION
Map the only issue
> with Melloware's PR (https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56)
> from a couple of years ago? That PR mentions
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain for details on the license,
> which unfortunately no longer works. However, looking
settle on Java 8 so this isn't an
> impediment to getting a new BeanUtils 2.0 release out the door?
> Josh.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xeno Amess
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 5:21 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaf
While some might have some preferences on more recent Java versions, I haven't
seen any objections to Java 8. Staying on Java 8 shouldn't really cause issues
for anyone. Can we settle on Java 8 so this isn't an impediment to getting a
new BeanUtils 2.0 release out
Are legal concerns of using Netty's ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap the only issue
with Melloware's PR (https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56) from
a couple of years ago? That PR mentions
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain for details on the license,
which unf
each version under which spring using be OK
> >
> > From: Richard Zowalla
> > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 12:59:15 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
> >
> > My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used i
Which points to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-509
Gary
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 5:24 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-700
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, 10:16 AM Xeno Amess wrote:
>
>> IMO I thi
m: Melloware Inc
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 9:18:08 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
>
> Well in my PR the license in the file says this.
>
> Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members o
9:15 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
>
> My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets
> 8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher.
>
> People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move
There are two threads on this list, one for the custom map, one for the
Java platform.
Gary
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 4:34 PM Steve Bosman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have any suggestions for something I could look at to help get
> beanutils ready for v2?
>
> Meanwhile, I've be
Hi,
Do you have any suggestions for something I could look at to help get
beanutils ready for v2?
Meanwhile, I've been looking at improving test coverage of BeanComparator
and I've simplified the internal natural order comparator - PR incoming
Steve
IMO I think it ok...so Gary which part do you feel unsafe in it ？I must admit I
am not that familiar to lawyer things..
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 9:18:08 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0
o: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
>
> I submitted this PR years ago using ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap from Doug Lea
> and the Netty team but Gary had concerns from legal about being able to use
> it.
>
> PR is here: http
why not write an email to lea ..maybe he be so kind that would be glad to offer
one mit-like license copy of that class
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 8:32:38 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0
I submitted this PR years ago using ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap from Doug Lea
and the Netty team but Gary had concerns from legal about being able to use
it.
PR is here: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 7:22 AM Xeno Amess wrote:
> I thought old d-lea
: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap
> with the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
>
> If you think this is a bad idea,
good and should did it 5 years ago
From: Niall Pemberton
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 1:46:32 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
for 90%+ normal user each version under which spring using be OK
From: Richard Zowalla
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 12:59:15 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE
the “weak” aspect also needs to
be retained - so in principle yes, but the implementation detail matters.
BeanUtils caused memory issues in multiple ClassLoader environments (e.g.
WebApp containers) because of strong references to classes prevented them
from being garbage collected if the app was
My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets
8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher.
People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move (thanks to the name change). So
perhaps 11 or 17 would be a good fit for a baseline version.
Gruß
Richard
Am 14
On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 22:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a
> platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go
> is 17, but that's just me.
According to the 3rd link, Java version usage in 2024 is
7
The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a
platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go
is 17, but that's just me.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 4:11 PM Elric wrote:
> On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > An
On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
I have no vote, but I would go for 21. This will likely be a decision
that will have an impact for a long time. 21 is 1 year old, 17 is 3
y
I could live with any of these.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open
I concur.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open
My vote would be for 11 but I am ok with 8 if people feel strongly.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:21 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
>
> Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
>
> Some perhaps helpful information:
>
> -
> https://w
I think this is a good idea.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:00 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap
> with the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
>
> If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why.
>
> Gary
>
> --
Hi All,
Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
Some perhaps helpful information:
- https://www.azul.com/wp-content/uploads/final-2023-state-of-java-report.pdf
- https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2023/java/
- https://newrelic.c
Hi All,
For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap with
the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why.
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap
; comments in the PR.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:41 PM Gary D. Gregory >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have thou
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Considering the long history of problematic Serializable implementations
> > throughout the Java ecosystem, not just in Commons, I propose that no
> > BeanUtils types implement Serializable in the upcoming new major version
> > 2.0.
> >
>
+1 from me.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:51 PM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Considering the long history of problematic Serializable implementations
> throughout the Java ecosystem, not just in Commons, I propose that no
> BeanUtils types implement Serializable in the upc
Hi All,
Considering the long history of problematic Serializable implementations
throughout the Java ecosystem, not just in Commons, I propose that no BeanUtils
types implement Serializable in the upcoming new major version 2.0.
Instead, we would document that if you want to serialize objects
>
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:41 PM Gary D. Gregory
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have thoughts on PR
> > > > https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/276 ?
; >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:41 PM Gary D. Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Does anyone have thoughts on PR
> > > https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/276 ?
> > >
> > > TY,
> > > Gary
&
i All,
> >
> > Does anyone have thoughts on PR
> > https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/276 ?
> >
> > TY,
> > Gary
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
to modify the behavior in
> the
> > > next
> > > > major release (2.0).
> > > >
> > >
> > > The only reason the 2nd beans were added was to preserve compatibility
> at
> > > the time
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
ext
> > > major release (2.0).
> > >
> >
> > The only reason the 2nd beans were added was to preserve compatibility at
> > the time
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-285
> >
> > Original JIRA:
> > https://issues.apache.
to modify the behavior in the
> next
> > major release (2.0).
> >
>
> The only reason the 2nd beans were added was to preserve compatibility at
> the time
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-285
>
> Original JIRA:
> https://issues.apac
1 - 100 of 929 matches
Mail list logo
