I could live with any of these. -----Original Message----- From: Melloware Inc <melloware...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you believe this is a phishing email, use the Report to Cybersecurity icon in Outlook. My vote would be for 11 but I am ok with 8 if people feel strongly. On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:21 PM Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0? > > Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21. > > Some perhaps helpful information: > > - > https://www.azul.com/wp-content/uploads/final-2023-state-of-java-report.pdf > - https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-2023/java/ > - https://newrelic.com/resources/report/2024-state-of-the-java-ecosystem > - > https://sdtimes.com/softwaredev/report-java-17-is-now-the-most-used-version-of-java-in-production/ > > Gary > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- ============================== Melloware melloware...@gmail.com http://melloware.com/ ==============================
