Which points to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-509
Gary On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 5:24 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-700 > > Gary > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, 10:16 AM Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> IMO I think it ok...so Gary which part do you feel unsafe in it ？I must >> admit I am not that familiar to lawyer things.. >> ________________________________ >> From: Melloware Inc <melloware...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 9:18:08 PM >> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap >> >> Well in my PR the license in the file says this. >> >> Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 >> Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at >> @see <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain";>Creative >> Commons</a> >> >> it says its public domain. >> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 9:01 AM Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > why not write an email to lea ..maybe he be so kind that would be glad >> to >> > offer one mit-like license copy of that class >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Melloware Inc <melloware...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 8:32:38 PM >> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >> > Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap >> > >> > I submitted this PR years ago using ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap from Doug >> Lea >> > and the Netty team but Gary had concerns from legal about being able to >> use >> > it. >> > >> > PR is here: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56 >> > >> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 7:22 AM Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > I thought old d-lea bro have a concurrent weak hashmap implement >> > > somewhere...why not just ask him >> > > after all nobody here more expert than him in this area >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> >> > > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2024 1:46:32 PM >> > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >> > > Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap >> > > >> > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom >> > WeakFastHashMap >> > > > with the stock ConcurrentHashMap. >> > > > >> > > > If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why. >> > > >> > > >> > > It’s a good idea for the “fast” part, but the “weak” aspect also >> needs to >> > > be retained - so in principle yes, but the implementation detail >> matters. >> > > >> > > BeanUtils caused memory issues in multiple ClassLoader environments >> (e.g. >> > > WebApp containers) because of strong references to classes prevented >> them >> > > from being garbage collected if the app was reloaded/restarted. So >> this >> > > weak map was introduced to resolve that issue. >> > > >> > > Niall >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Gary >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ============================== >> > Melloware >> > melloware...@gmail.com >> > http://melloware.com >> > ============================== >> > >> >> >> -- >> ============================== >> Melloware >> melloware...@gmail.com >> http://melloware.com >> ============================== >> >
