My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets 
8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher.

People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move (thanks to the name change). So 
perhaps 11 or 17 would be a good fit for a baseline version.

Gruß 
Richard 

Am 14. September 2024 00:00:48 MESZ schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:
>On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 22:01, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a
>> platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go
>> is 17, but that's just me.
>
>According to the 3rd link, Java version usage in 2024 is
>
>7 - 0.2%
>8 - 28.8%
>11 - 32.9%
>17 - 35.4%
>21 - 1.4%
>
>Here is the list showing the percentages that will no longer be
>supported by choosing a particular version:
>
>7 - 0%
>8 - 0.2%
>11 - 29%
>17 - 61.9%
>21 - 97.3%
>
>Bigger is definitely not better here.
>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 4:11 PM Elric <el...@melnib.one> wrote:
>>
>> > On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0?
>> > >
>> > > Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21.
>> >
>> > I have no vote, but I would go for 21. This will likely be a decision
>> > that will have an impact for a long time. 21 is 1 year old, 17 is 3
>> > years old, 11 is already already 6 years old, and 8 is over 10 years old.
>> >
>> > People can continue to use 1.x if they are stuck on ancient Java
>> > versions, but there should be no need to for any major release of any
>> > commons project to stick to older versions.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

Reply via email to