To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hi Gilles,
>
> Although it is nice to work on a new design, I now have a problem with the
> issue as a whole: Where are the people (and applications) that need this?
> At least four persons made suggestions/comments on what was maybe wrong or
> could be improved, but they either are not active dev
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4-testframework has an issue affecting its community
i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 30 March 2012 01:00, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb wrot
>> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump.
>
> if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a
> compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer comp
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb wrot
>> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump.
>
> if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a
> compatibility break? My argument is it is no lo
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb wrot
> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump.
if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a
compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer compatible with
jdk5.
However, please do not consider my concerns a
On 30 March 2012 00:36, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on the move to java 6
>>>
>>> we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
>>> leave it up to you
>>>
>>
>> Since you are the second
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on the move to java 6
>>
>> we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
>> leave it up to you
>>
>
> Since you are the second person that suggests it, this Java move on this
> partic
Thanks for all the info guys!
As Ted Dunning mentioned, the inverse cumulative function is specific to
GammaDistributionImpl (I'm actually using commons math 2.2). What then is
the algorithm that GammaDistributionImpl.sample() uses? The link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_transform_samplin
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1 on the move to java 6
>
> we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
> leave it up to you
>
Since you are the second person that suggests it, this Java move on this
particular component could be a 3.0. I can g
+1 on the move to java 6
we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i
leave it up to you
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>> Will the resulting jars still run on jdk 1.5?
>> I think I would sug
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Will the resulting jars still run on jdk 1.5?
> I think I would suggest a new major version if not.
>
Hi Paul.
No, if we use Java 6 APIs, you'll get errors on Java 5.
We have not required major version change in the past for changing Jav
Hello.
> as agreed, I've started a JIRA ticket on this long-standing issue (see
> MATH-765). This ticket is really meant as a summary of the discussions
> which should take place on the mailing list, so please refrain from
> adding comments (unless absolutely necessary). Children tickets will
> be
Am 29. März 2012 22:07 schrieb sebb :
> On 29 March 2012 20:45, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> how about renaming CSVLexer.simpleTokenLexer() and
>> CSVLexer.encapsulatedTokenLexer(), so that the method names express
>> what the methods do?
>> For example simpleTokenLexer() could be renamed
On 29 March 2012 20:45, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hey,
>
> how about renaming CSVLexer.simpleTokenLexer() and
> CSVLexer.encapsulatedTokenLexer(), so that the method names express
> what the methods do?
> For example simpleTokenLexer() could be renamed to parseSimpleToken or
> parseSimpleTokenConte
Hey,
how about renaming CSVLexer.simpleTokenLexer() and
CSVLexer.encapsulatedTokenLexer(), so that the method names express
what the methods do?
For example simpleTokenLexer() could be renamed to parseSimpleToken or
parseSimpleTokenContent.
Likewise encapsulatedTokenLexer() could be renamed to
par
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
There are a handful of Jira issues I'd like to clear up before the first RC is
rolled. They are on my todo list but Tomcat stuff keeps getting in the way. I'd
really like to see pool2 make some progress so I'll try and find some time for
this in the coming week.
Of course, anyone else is free t
Hello,
I filed a bug yesterday (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-213)
against commons-pool. We are seeing getNumActive (the _numActive counter)
return negative values on our production servers using Hector (Cassandra
client that uses commons-pool for connection pooling). I noticed that
Hi Mikkel,
>
> I have created MATH-774 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-774
> and assigned it to myself. I will check if other of the implemented
> methods in oacm.random are not used either and open new issues if that
> is the case.
>
> Thanks for making us aware of this, Paul.
>
> Cheer
Dear all,
I have created MATH-774 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-774
and assigned it to myself. I will check if other of the implemented
methods in oacm.random are not used either and open new issues if that
is the case.
Thanks for making us aware of this, Paul.
Cheers, Mikkel.
2012
Hi.
>
> Have you looked at the nextGamma in org.apache.commons.math.random? It
> should be much faster than using the inversion method.
Whenever there is a specific (thus faster) implementation (in
"RandomDataImpl"), it should be called from the "sample" method of the
corresponding distribution
Hi Paul,
Have you looked at the nextGamma in org.apache.commons.math.random? It
should be much faster than using the inversion method.
Cheers, Mikkel.
2012/3/29 Ted Dunning :
> Yes the sample method is inherited, but the inverse cumulative distribution
> function is not.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
30 matches
Mail list logo
