Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier > <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> +1 on the move to java 6 >> >> we should consider to go to 3.0... its a breaking change... but i >> leave it up to you >> > > Since you are the second person that suggests it, this Java move on this > particular component could be a 3.0. I can go for that. Thoughts from > others?
Normally 3.0 would mean, that we can no longer provide this version as a binary drop in (at least for Java apps running JDK 6). Just upgrading the JDK does not mean that we have to break the API. Then 2.3 is the better choice. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
