Hi.

> 
> Have you looked at the nextGamma in org.apache.commons.math.random? It
> should be much faster than using the inversion method.

Whenever there is a specific (thus faster) implementation (in
"RandomDataImpl"), it should be called from the "sample" method of the
corresponding distribution class.

We should correct this performance bug.
Could you open an issue on the bug tracking system?


Best,
Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to