On 30 March 2012 01:00, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrot >> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump. > > if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a > compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer compatible with > jdk5.
True, but that is not how the Commons versioning scheme currently works. http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html > However, please do not consider my concerns a -1 on the version name, > I am fine with 2.3 too. > > Cheers > Christian > > >> >>> - Jörg >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
