On 29 March 2012 20:45, Benedikt Ritter <benerit...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hey, > > how about renaming CSVLexer.simpleTokenLexer() and > CSVLexer.encapsulatedTokenLexer(), so that the method names express > what the methods do? > For example simpleTokenLexer() could be renamed to parseSimpleToken or > parseSimpleTokenContent. > Likewise encapsulatedTokenLexer() could be renamed to > parseEncapsulatedToken or parseEncapsulatedTokenContent.
They are private methods so the name is arbitrary. I also think the current names are OK. I'm not sure I agree that the methods are parsers. They are closer to lexers. > Benedikt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
