I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If
there are no significant problems reported with this RC, I will roll a
final distribution making only version number changes and kick off a
VOTE based on the release bits later this week.
Changes since RC1:
* Site fixes
* Java
Hi,
I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
release used commons-parent version 4 and the only real change is to
upgrade to the latest version 6 of commons-parent.
A full diff of the pom.xml can be found at this address:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/com
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35318&projectId=171
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:59:11 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:59:33 -0800
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35318&projectId=171
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:59:11 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:59:33 -0800
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35301&projectId=166
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:43:12 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:43:35 -0800
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35298&projectId=165
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:41:01 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:41:19 -0800
Total time: 17s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number: 9
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35297&projectId=163
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:40:22 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:40:41 -0800
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number: 8
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35296&projectId=162
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:39:50 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:40:06 -0800
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number: 7
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35294&projectId=161
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:37:07 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:37:53 -0800
Total time: 45s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number: 2
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35293&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:36:18 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:36:43 -0800
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35293&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:36:18 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:36:43 -0800
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35291&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:34:33 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:34:49 -0800
Total time: 15s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=35291&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:34:33 -0800
Finished at: Sun 6 Jan 2008 19:34:49 -0800
Total time: 15s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
This issue is being tracked as POOL-120.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This vote has passed with seven +1 (binding) votes from the following people:
Jochen Wiedmann
Rahul Akolkar
Ben Speakmon
Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell
Niall Pemberton
Thanks for taking the time to review/vote - I'll do the release shortly.
Niall
On Jan 3, 2008 1:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
On Jan 6, 2008 9:18 AM, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > +public static boolean deleteQuietly(File file) {
> > +if (file == null) {
> > +return false;
> > +}
> > +try {
> > +if (file.isDirectory()) {
> >
On Jan 6, 2008 6:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
> > >>
On Jan 6, 2008 11:37 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mostly the former - I imagine that actual testing of DBCP against
> Derby won't be as important as being able to run it against
> Oracle/MySQL/SQL Server etc.
>
> Looking to get my feet wet in [performance], and finishing the unit
Hi,
+1 to Commons IO 1.4!
On Jan 6, 2008 4:58 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:23 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we should deal with IO-137 as it's a minor enhancement and
> > comes with tests. I'll volunteer to look at that.
>
> I looked
Mostly the former - I imagine that actual testing of DBCP against
Derby won't be as important as being able to run it against
Oracle/MySQL/SQL Server etc.
Looking to get my feet wet in [performance], and finishing the unit
tests against Derby and Jetty seemed like a good way to get started.
Hen
On 04/01/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 11:53 AM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:46 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On Jan 3, 2008 6:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > > >
On 05/01/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any opinions on which way to go with
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-381 would be very much
> appreciated.
>
> Currently my instinct is to go with making min/max obey the JDK - ie)
> old IEEE, and adding a IEEE754rUtils class wit
On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
> >> thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following:
> >>
When you say "unit test," do you mean a unit test like the ones in
[performance] now that verify that the framework does what it is
supposed to, or a (set of) configuration file(s) that run tests
against derby?
I am open to any and all ideas on how to make the config and overall
setup in [performa
I opened a JIRA ticket for the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-119
Christoph
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 3:39 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Yes. It may be ultimately best to make this configurable. If you are
OK with this approach, w
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following:
1) Resolve the following issues, which all have patches except IO-149
which
I reviewed the tasks list, and coded up IO-153 :-)
Stephen
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following:
1) Resolve the following issues, which all have patches except IO-149
which is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+public static boolean deleteQuietly(File file) {
+if (file == null) {
+return false;
+}
+try {
+if (file.isDirectory()) {
+cleanDirectory(file);
+}
+} catch (Throwable t) {
+}
Does it make sense to create a unit test that does dbcp testing on top of Derby?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 5, 2008 3:39 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Yes. It may be ultimately best to make this configurable. If you are
> > OK with this approach, what I suggest is that you open a JIRA ticket,
> > attaching a version of your patch that supports configurability
31 matches
Mail list logo
