I opened a JIRA ticket for the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-119
Christoph
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 3:39 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Yes. It may be ultimately best to make this configurable. If you are
OK with this approach, what I suggest is that you open a JIRA ticket,
attaching a version of your patch that supports configurability. Open
the ticket against 1.3 for now but keep the patch as is (i.e. against
1.4 release branch).
+1. I think this is the way to go.
Just finished reading my way through the thread.
Christoph's use case seems very valuable - the ability to linearize
the object creation so that not all of the creations are needed if
objects are handed back, so having a JIRA ticket for 1.5 seems a great
way to go. It doesn't seem to me from the discussion that the proposed
1.4 will make matters worse than they are under 1.3.
+1
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
