On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
> >> thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following:
> >>
> >> 1) Resolve the following issues, which all have patches except IO-149
> >> which is trivial
> >>   IO-149 - Make FilenameUtils.EXTENSION_SEPARATOR public
> >>   IO-105 - Add a FileUtils.copyDirectoryStructure method
> >>   IO-152 - Add ByteArrayOutputStream.readFrom(InputStream)
> >>   IO-135 - Add convenience deleteQuietly to FileUtils
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> 2) Move the following issues to post-1.4
> >>   IO-137 - Added method for getting InputStream from
> >> ByteArrayOutputStream & IOUtils avoiding unnecessary array allocation
> >> and copy
> >>   IO-51  - Throttled input and output stream classes
> >>   IO-77 - add a convenience FileUtils.move(File src, File dest)
> >
> > +1 on IO-77 being post-1.4 as it lacks unit tests.
> >
> > I think we should deal with IO-137 as it's a minor enhancement and
> > comes with tests. I'll volunteer to look at that.
> >
> > IO-51 has tests, so worth a look at if that can be done before the
> > others are resolved. ie) punt to post-1.4 iff it's the last one left.
> >
> >> 3) Upgrade to commons-parent-6 pom.xml which looks like the release
> >> will be approved shortly
> >>
> >> Thoughts on this?
> >
> > Delete the M1 build, and maybe Ant given that the build.xml is M1 generated.
>
> For the Logging release I documented in RELEASE-NOTES.txt that the M1
> build was deprecated and that it will be removed in a future release. If
> it is still working that can be a smooth transition. Deprecate it and
> remove it in the next release, or just remove it straight away.
>
> There is an Ant plugin for M2 as well. I haven't used it myself, but I
> could have a go at it, if we think it'd be good to still have a basic
> Ant build around.
>
> > And IO-148 + IO-127?
> >
> > Hen
>

I could not work out from the current web-site which versions of Java
are supported.

Seems to me this should be added to the dependencies page.

Also, the current dependencies page lists junit as a run-time
dependency, which seems wrong.

IClasses need documentation on whether they are thread-safe or not.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to