RE: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 I'd second that. Move to apache-cloudstack make sense. Regards, Sateesh Chodapuneedi Chief Product Engineer, CloudPlatform Development, Accelerite. Off: +91 80 6772 1329 | EMail: sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com www.accelerite.com > -Original Message- > From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailt

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:23 PM, sebgoa wrote: > >> “cloudstack” is a trademark of the ASF. > > > ​ok, good. I thought is was refused on the grounds of being to generic a > term.​ > > something too check with VP brand. AFAIK, Cloudst

Acs-management fencing VMs, on agent unavailable

Hi guys, we had some strange (I would say...) happening last night. We have 2 node keepalived "cluster" with haproxy providing agent-to-management-server connections. We did some LB maintance, so we restarted keepalived (VIP moved to another haproxy node...), so there was I would say 2-3 sec net

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Agreed Mike, there may be confusion generated by the concurrent MCC fork by SBP but that is not related to the Apache CloudStack developer workflow improvements being discussed. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > As far as I understand, cloudstack/cloudstack is only being

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user srikanteswartalluri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431#issuecomment-197927026 sure. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > > I think we are on the same page. I think we just need to start ironing out > the actual logistical and technical details for how to move forward. +1 - Sam Ruby

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9265 cleanup around httpclient...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1385#issuecomment-197459214 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 103 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=103 Failed=16 Skipped=4

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user chrismattmann closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the fea

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Sebastien, Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board. The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that there were more than a few board members that were a bit concerned at the prospect of Apache C

Re: github organisation cloudstack

Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a thread titled: Re: External fork of Cloudstack Mailing list link: http://markmail.org/message/53ct2mma4x4jm6s2?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Re:+External+fork+of+Cloudstack Please come join the conversation in that thread..

[IMPORTANT] Huge Github PR Backlog

Hi Folks, What can we do about PR backlog in GitHub? As we all know, it will be very difficult to merge the changes - as things will get out of sync. Feedback is welcome, Thanks, ilya

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9142 Migrate VM changes xmlDes...

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1348#discussion_r56420080 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtMigrateCommandWrapper.java --- @@ -190,4 +195,27 @@ Use VIR_DOMA

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297 - Reworked logic in Stora...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197935023 @mike-tutkowski thanks for the improvements on PR title and description. I understand the point of throwing an exception and I really like that approa

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 for the move to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack From: Will Stevens Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 4:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack' We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 th

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197375495 Thanks, @ustcweizhou! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user srikanteswartalluri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431#issuecomment-197904292 @swill Yes, PR is ready to be merged. Do you see any problem with that? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3481

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3489

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: OSPF: adding dynamically routing capabili...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#issuecomment-198256679 Would you mind running a broader test suite to verify that there are no regressions? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431#issuecomment-197903262 I am not going to revert this merge at this time, but please ping me if you feel the PR is ready to be merged into master. Thx... --- If your project is set up for

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:23 PM, sebgoa wrote: > “cloudstack” is a trademark of the ASF. ​ok, good. I thought is was refused on the grounds of being to generic a term.​ -- Daan

Issue: CLOUDSTACK-9255 Unable to start VM DomainRouter due to error in finalizeStart

Hi All We are facing the same issue as reported by Milamber (Ticket 9255) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9255. When deploying a couple of VMs or Port Forwarding's the re-deployment of the router with cleanup fails. We found that iptables configuration takes a lot of time, t

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#discussion_r56506811 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java --- @@ -3115,6 +3125,9 @@ public VmStatsEntry getVmSt

Re: Issue: CLOUDSTACK-9255 Unable to start VM DomainRouter due to error in finalizeStart

Hi, This issue has been resolved some time ago but unfortunately the PR hasn’t been merged nor tested yet. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1400 This PR makes it like 50-60 times faster, because it first generates all iptables commands and then loads them once. We run this in product

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197893296 should we revert this merge in favor of fixing these issues? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user srikanteswartalluri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431#issuecomment-197905351 If the concern is jenkins build, I mentioned that they are not related to these integration test code but they are junit tests. --- If your project is

Re: github organisation cloudstack

The copying existing PRs would be for the purpose of running CI against it in the context of being able to automate what happens next given the result. I am going to be putting time into fixing marvin tests and also merging in any fixes to marvin to try to get the CI runs as bulletproof as possibl

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9304: Add nuagevsp userdata te...

Github user chinu2909 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1431#issuecomment-197539050 LGTM based on the test results test_01_UserDataPasswordReset (nuagevsp.test_nuage_password_reset.TestNuagePasswordReset) ... === TestName: test_01_UserDa

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197917819 @ustcweizhou the point is more that there are things in this PR that I am not comfortable with and as the 4.9 RM, I need to be comfortable with the code that goes into

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [Bug-Id: CLOUDSTACK-9306]Replace testdata...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-197551390 I will test this as soon as my CI is up and running. If anyone else has had a chance to test this and can post the results I will merge it right away. Thx... ---

Re: [IMPORTANT] Huge Github PR Backlog

PRs needs to be tested obviously, that is the current impediment. The moment you test a PR, you get current master and merge the PR and test that result. Once it’s OK, merge it to master and take next one, etc. I wouldn’t start rebasing, as you’ll have a lot of work and will need to keep doing t

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

On 03/18/2016 11:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > *Proposal:* > Transfer ownership of the 'apache/cloudstack' mirrored repository out of > the 'apache' github organization into the 'apache-cloudstack' github > organization (which I have already setup and started inviting users to). > Both members of t

Re: [POLL] Interest for EU based event/collab

Hi Giles, Berlin is great! Has there been any discussions about a specific date yet? Personally I have some vacation plans in that time frame (not that it should matter for the event). I agree that combing the efforts we have is a good thing, I am hoping for something bigger than a traditional U

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197932674 @swill, I understand your position; as you, I also think that there was room for improvements in this PR (especially to avoid possible runtime exception).

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #491

See Changes: [maneesha.papireddygari] CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtualMachines API call to include -- [...truncated 425 lines...] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#discussion_r56508389 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java --- @@ -3026,11 +3031,16 @@ public VmStat

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Will Stevens wrote: I may be thinking too far outside the box, but hear me out as this is likely the best way to satisfy everyone's requirements. Recap: The community needs additional github permissions in order to integrate CI in order to maintain code quality

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 (binding) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 18 March, 2016 22:44:45 > Subject: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack' > We are

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 (binding) > Op 18 mrt. 2016 om 23:44 heeft Will Stevens het > volgende geschreven: > > We are discussing this proposal in 3 or 4 threads, so I will not try to > recap everything. Instead I will try to give a brief overview of the > problem and a proposal for solving it. > > *Problem:* > Th

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197929660 Hi @rafaelweingartner Thanks for the comments. Just wanted to point out that if the revertSnapshot method is invoked, then that is actually a failure

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Mike, Thank you. What you describe effectively below is going to implicitly switch the “canonical” repo in my opinion of the repository to cloudstack/cloudstack. Merges that happen there, conversation that happens there on PRs and issues, labels, etc., will be captured there and likely at incr

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Chris, I don't see how cloudstack/cloudstack can be a problem to the foudation except for the PMC as they will be left with managing keeping it in sync. I also don't see how a fork can be against apache policy as anyone is allowed to fork the software at any time. We as PMC are no exception (wisd

Re: [IMPORTANT] Huge Github PR Backlog

Sometimes they might seem old, but when interaction just sort of... stops, it can be hard to keep track of what is going on with the PRs. Currently we have 6 or 7 open PRs that no one has commented on or looked at in months. Two were recently updated with integration test results at least. One is m

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9003 Make VirtualMachineName i...

Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/988 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featur

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9298: Improve performance of r...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-198519031 @nvazquez that is great. I can give an LGTM now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197939345 @rafaelweingartner I don't mind waiting a bit, but runtime exceptions need to be taken seriously. As the 4.9 RM, it is my responsibility to make sure this type of stu

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197892304 @chrismattmann would you mind closing this PR since we can't and we don't need extra clutter in here. Thx. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > As to forks being against Apache > policy, forks are not, however forks that use the Apache e.g., > namespace, that have the Apache logo, that use the Apache name for > the project *are* against Apache policy. If it’s a fork, it needs > a n

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

+BCC: David Nalley for possible guidance. Apache infra stated that 'The VP' dictated the policy to not allow 'repo:status' across the board for projects. Has anyone tried to engage the VP, in order to get them to have a closer look at this policy? It appears to be no way to exploit that function m

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

Hi Sam. Thank you very much for joining the conversation. We look forward to working with you and appreciate your guidance on the matter. Just a quick note regarding my suggestion and the 'perception' concern you raised. I am actually proposing that we do an ownership transfer of the 'apache/cl

RE: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

+1 Sounds like a plan. Paul Angus VP Technology , ShapeBlue t: @cloudyangus e: paul.an...@shapeblue.com| w: www.shapeblue.com From: John Burwell [mailto:john.burw...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Frida

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Chris, We have never met but i recognize your name from members only ASF threads. For the benefit of others on this list it is useful to mention that you are a member of the ASF board. The PMC has filed its quarterly report for march, as well as an interim report about a month ago. The in

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 - Agent throws an excepti...

Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1429#issuecomment-198513018 Closing this PR, as this issue has been address more cleanly in my other PR against 4.7 - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430 --- If your project is s

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3484

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297 - Reworked logic in Stora...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197970382 Ok @mike-tutkowski, now I believe I understand a little bit more of the code. You are reusing a method that already exist and returns the Strateg

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297 - Reworked logic in Stora...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197948544 I understand that your point that some other classes can overwrite that method and may return other elements of the enum. However, I do not see anything e

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9283: add pid to java argument...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1409#issuecomment-197771350 LGTM works fine in our internal version. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as wel

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8830 : VM snapshot creation fa...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1377#issuecomment-197828321 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 106 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=14 Skipped=4

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

Thank you for this information, this is very helpful. On Mar 19, 2016 5:29 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote: > On 03/18/2016 11:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > > > *Proposal:* > > Transfer ownership of the 'apache/cloudstack' mirrored repository out of > > the 'apache' github organization into the 'apache-clo

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I may be thinking too far outside the box, but hear me out as this is > likely the best way to satisfy everyone's requirements. > > Recap: The community needs additional github permissions in order to > integrate CI in order to maintain code

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Hi Sam. Thank you very much for joining the conversation. We look forward > to working with you and appreciate your guidance on the matter. > > Just a quick note regarding my suggestion and the 'perception' concern you > raised. I am actual

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3483

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Remi, I have moved most of the failing tests to known issues, and modified the reports accordingly. Now we should see only the passed test suits. When we see a failed test in multiple runs we can move it to known issues and start fixing them. Thanks, Bharat. On 15-Mar-2016, at 4:36 PM, Remi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197508210 @chrismattmann how about you send email to private@ before sending some dummy PR. thank you --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3368

Daan, Will, I have tested Daan's original PR-1427, and it looks good. I am running into a build issue with the 1438 - nothing related to the checkin. Hope to resolve it later this weekend or on Monday. Best, Raja -Original Message- From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev.

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

FYI, I am supportive of the below as well and willing to help where I can. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: on behalf of Sam Ruby Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Date: Friday, March 18, 2016 at 10:52 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: External fork of Clouds

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and > gives no indication of official status. That may be OK for a work in > progress, but isn't ideal as a final solution. I'll share that I've > heard (second and third ha

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Hi Will, Cloudstack is more than just the code and its mirroring. It’s the community and the ability for those to participate. The issues that occur at cloudstack/cloudstack will not be mirrored to the ASF; the convo won’t be mirrored, and least of all the people and their belief in the branding o

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3485

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: OSPF: WIP formatting documenta...

Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/36#issuecomment-198702503 Hi @agneya2001, could you please consider the following suggestions? - Line 1453, change from "debian" to "Debian"; - at lines 1476 and 1480

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in such a technical decision) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you for this information, this is very helpful. > On Mar 19, 2016 5:29 AM, "Rene Moser" wrote: > > > On 03/18/2016 11:44 PM, Will

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

Hm, Will let's use a vote thread for voting. My brain is old and rigid and needs the clarity of it. Just to be clear, are we keeping the cloudstack organisation for experimenting and we do the move to apache-cloudstack? I am not sure if github has a policy on naming of organisations so It would be

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > That sounds like a cop-out to me related to what's really going > on. > ​Jim, I am not a native english speaker and this remark has no meaning to me. It sounds somewhat hostile, can you explain what you mean? ​ -- Daan

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on the same page. We are charting new territory here, so removing as many unnecessary distractions and

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) > > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on the > same page. We are charting new

Re: github organisation cloudstack

Will, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a thread titled: Re: > External fork of Cloudstack > > Mailing list link: > > http://markmail.org/message/53ct2mma4x4jm6s2?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Re:+Extern

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> That sounds like a cop-out to me related to what's really going >> on. > > Jim, I am not a native english speaker and this remark has no meaning to > me. It sounds somewhat hostile,

Re: [POLL] Interest for EU based event/collab

Hi guys, we've been quiet lately, but we want to organize a collab event in Canada, our target dates are June 2 and 3. We just cleared some questionning regarding the planning and now ready to go forward. Could an european one be postpone? Il start a new thread in the mailing list... On Mar 16, 2

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#discussion_r56509710 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java --- @@ -3332,7 +3332,14 @@ public P

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

As far as I understand, cloudstack/cloudstack is only being proposed to help with developer workflow and CI. To my understanding, all code that goes in there will end up back in the canonical ASF CloudStack repo (and, as such, be mirrored to apache/cloudstack). This is simply a workaround to he

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

OK, last comment for a bit, sorry for the top post, going to try and mix 2 replies in 1 email. To Sebastien: It’s more than just permissions - it’s where people *go to* and *believe* that the community making the code is at. In all of your statements, that community will be cloudstack/cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Emit event UUIDs on template deletion

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1378#issuecomment-197705664 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 105 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=14 Skipped=4

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8800 : Improved the listVirtua...

Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/780#issuecomment-197890163 I see this was merged into master this morning. Hmmm... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board. > > The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the > ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that > there were more than a

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Thanks for the explanation Sam, I have to ask for your patience with me as there is one remark in there that leaves me confused; Don't feel obligated to answer in length but please confirm or negate my suspicion On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: ​...​ > Despite this clear failure

Re: github organisation cloudstack

I agree that your title better describes what we are trying to achieve. On Mar 19, 2016 9:57 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Will, > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > Please be advised this conversation is continuing in a thread titled: Re: > > External fork of Cloudsta

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Sam, Thanks for this context, I found it very helpful. We have an interesting situation where no large companies are involved, and really this is all about the needs of open source users. As you know Apache CloudStack is highly user driven, and is perhaps thankfully off the radar of the large indu

Re: github organisation cloudstack

I mentioned it here since that was the thread that Sam and Chris were most engaged in, so I wanted the people who were watching these other threads be aware of that thread as we were getting good traction there. On Mar 19, 2016 9:57 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Will, > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the time being. On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > On Sat,

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Please board and everybody at dev, Until the vote thread initiated by Will no action has been taken or sactioned by the PMC, only discussions were started. It has never been the intention of the PMC to move away from any repository but only to add a fork to facilitate work. The misunderstanding des

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

+1 (maybe put/fork upr in there to prevent any cleaning from happening? ;) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think > the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely > change bas

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Thanks for the explanation Sam, I have to ask for your patience with me as > there is one remark in there that leaves me confused; Don't feel obligated > to answer in length but please confirm or negate my suspicion > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ian Rae wrote: > Sam, > > Thanks for this context, I found it very helpful. We have an > interesting situation where no large companies are involved, and > really this is all about the needs of open source users. As you know > Apache CloudStack is highly user driv

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thank you. What you describe effectively below is going to > implicitly switch the “canonical” repo in my opinion of the > > repository to cloudstack/cloudstack. Merges that happen there, > conversation that hap

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9289:Automation for feature de...

Github user nitt10prashant commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1417#issuecomment-198314365 @GabrielBrascher @sanju1010 i have removed redundant code --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...

Github user eriweb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1442#issuecomment-197510472 You could close it by pushing a dummy commit. But yes, I have to agree that sending a PR is some weird communication form! --- If your project is set up for it, you

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3491

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

Top posting because keeping track is going to be hard. Remi and I have talked several times with David about GitHub access and so far the answer has been no. There are several issues in my understanding: - apache on github is one single org, so if you get some write permission in the org then

Re: [VOTE] Move 'apache/cloudstack' -> 'apache-cloudstack/cloudstack'

+1 On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > +1 (binding as I saw others mention that. I doubt this is of any concern in > such a technical decision) > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > Thank you for this information, this is very helpful. > > On Mar

  1   2   >