Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > This is the list of current features targeted for 4.4 according to our > Jira. Which features would be impacted if we don't move the feature freeze? > > [image: New Feature] CLOUDSTACK-6161 > distributed routing and network ACL with OVS p

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I think there is no consensus on feature freeze date yet ? Daan, Shall we call for a vote on this ? -abhi On 03/03/14 6:11 am, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >I believe March 14th is Feature Freeze and, as such, when the 4.4 branch >is >cut. > > >On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >

[4.3] Gobbledygook stats after overprovisioning

Hi, I'm on 4.3 rev 4440 (latest RC). After playing around with overprovisioning I'm left out with this in the Dashboard: 9.52 TB of (local) storage instead of 3.17 TB (although the individual primary storage entry in Infrastructure shows the right thing) 119.95 GHz instead of 60GHz (24 cores *

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Abhinandan, first one compromis-proposal, please. Can we not postpone but allow for this one feature (CLOUDSTACK-6161) this one time (4.4) to go in after feature freeze. If this is the only one and we don't consider this jurisprudence we could allow for it. @Hugo: say what? On Mon, Mar 3, 2014

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

I believe this is a bug too, because VMs not running on the storage, get destroyed too: Issue has been around for a long time, like with all others I reported. They do not get fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3367 We even lost assignee today. Regards, F. On 3/3/14 6:5

Re: Review Request 16274: Contrail VRouter Plugin - VPC Implementation, Bug fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16274/#review35949 --- suresh, this patch does not apply. You should upload it in th menu a

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 9:01 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: 4.3 gets the wrong number of CPU sockets

Hi, In case of KVM we read the socket count from the parameter ‘sockets’ in NodeInfo class. Can you check with the command “virsh nodeinfo” ? How many cores do you have per cpu ? Thanks Harikrishna On 02-Mar-2014, at 7:50 pm, Nux! wrote: > Hello, > > Which script is responsible for gettin

Re: Review Request 16688: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16688/#review35950 --- is this still a valid patch? should it be updated? - daan Hoogland

Re: 4.3 gets the wrong number of CPU sockets

On 03.03.2014 09:14, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: Hi, In case of KVM we read the socket count from the parameter ‘sockets’ in NodeInfo class. Can you check with the command “virsh nodeinfo” ? How many cores do you have per cpu ? Indeed it seems like libvirt issue: virsh nodeinfo CPU model:

Re: Review Request 17506: mvn clean - test logs- contrail -cleanps up only target, dist directories; testclient.log file should be generated inside target directory

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17506/#review35951 --- is this still valid? It is not applied on master. Should it be? - d

Re: Review Request 17591: CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't contain useful information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/#review35952 --- Commit ebcaec8632dbd92c071317f3190915244a287afb in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 17591: CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't contain useful information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/#review35953 --- Ship it! ebcaec8632dbd92c071317f3190915244a287afb - daan Hoogland

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I was looking into adding support for iSCSI (CLOUDSTACK-6109) and HA of guest vms (CLOUDSTACK-6144) for hyper-v. I don't think I'll be able to finish it by 14th. Regards, Devdeep From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:40 PM To:

Re: [DEVCLOUD2] Internet access on VMs

Ended up solving this with IP forwarding and iptables. Modified the devcloud.cfg to use 192.168.56.10 as the gateway. Enabled IPv4 Forwarding: sed -i -e 's/#net.ipv4.ip_forward=1/net.ipv4.ip_forward=1/g' /etc/sysctl.conf Setup appropriate iptables: -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o xenbr0 -m state --state N

Re: Review Request 16688: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16688/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 11:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

Review Request 18679: added a row for simulator in the hypervisor_capabilities

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18679/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Koushik Das, Santhosh Edukull

Re: Review Request 16688: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

> On March 3, 2014, 9:23 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > is this still a valid patch? should it be updated? I uploaded a new version for 4.2.1 systemvm - Axel --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://review

Review Request 18680: added mock handlers for VpnUsersCfgCommand and RemoteAccessVpnCfgCommand in the simulator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18680/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Koushik Das, Santhosh Edukull

Re: Review Request 18679: added a row for simulator in the hypervisor_capabilities

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18679/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 11:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

Pretty poor, I agree. IMHO the ACS agent should not be allowed to reboot the host server. This is not the type of things you would like to automate as you will eventually end up with broken volumes and data loss. And you are right of course, like what happened in my case. I currently have

Re: Review Request 18679: added a row for simulator in the hypervisor_capabilities

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18679/#review35956 --- setup/db/hypervisors.simulator.sql

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

Koushik, I understand that and I will put the storage into the maintenance mode next time. However, things happen and servers crash from time to time, which is not the reason to reboot all host servers, even those which do not have any running vms with volumes on the nfs storage. The bloody age

Review Request 18683: CLOUDSTACK-6194: Failed to increase Shared network IP Range

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18683/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Marcus Sorensen and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Bugs:

Re: Review Request 18352: CLOUDSTACK-6151: Local data disk with tag goes to the wrong local storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18352/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 1:57 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das a

[QUESTION]db unavailable recovery

H, is it normal behavior that cloudstack won't reconnect to the db if it has been down while cloudstack was running? I would expect a reconnect. Or is there a rationale for not attempting a reconnect? -- Daan

Re: [QUESTION]db unavailable recovery

On 03/03/2014 03:29 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: H, is it normal behavior that cloudstack won't reconnect to the db if it has been down while cloudstack was running? I would expect a reconnect. Or is there a rationale for not attempting a reconnect? It doesn't and that's normal. Since CS relies

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)

I have raised review via review board as well. On Monday, March 3, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Sonal, > > please do this via the review board. This might be inconvenient but it > gives us nicer trackrecords then mail threads do. > > thanks, > Daan > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Sonal Ojha

Re: [QUESTION]db unavailable recovery

Except if your db is the issue and all your management servers die. -- Erik 3. mars 2014 15:48 skrev "Wido den Hollander" følgende: > > > On 03/03/2014 03:29 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> H, >> >> is it normal behavior that cloudstack won't reconnect to the db if it >> has been down while cloud

Review Request 18689: CS-19420: [UI] Fixed invalid filed name (label.dynamically.scalable) on instance details.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18689/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: clou

Re: Review Request 18689: CS-19420: [UI] Fixed invalid field name (label.dynamically.scalable) on instance details.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18689/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 4:23 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Re: Review Request 18689: CS-19420: [UI] Fixed invalid field name (label.dynamically.scalable) on instance details.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18689/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 4:27 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

It's the standard clustering problem. Any software that does any sort of avtive clustering is going to fence nodes that have problems, or should if it cares about your data. If the risk of losing a host due to a storage pool outage is too great, you could perhaps look at rearranging your pool-to-ho

Re: Review Request 18683: CLOUDSTACK-6194: Failed to increase Shared network IP Range

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18683/#review35970 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marcus Sorensen On March 3, 2014, 12:53 p.m.

Review Request 18695: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-4563: Initial zone wizard UI label issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18695/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: clou

Re: [4.3] Gobbledygook stats after overprovisioning

On 03.03.2014 08:39, Nux! wrote: Hi, I'm on 4.3 rev 4440 (latest RC). After playing around with overprovisioning I'm left out with this in the Dashboard: 9.52 TB of (local) storage instead of 3.17 TB (although the individual primary storage entry in Infrastructure shows the right thing) 119.95 G

Re: [DISCUSS] realhostip.com going away

I talked with some of the Citrix folk over the weekend…their position is they think they’d be doing the community a disfavor by passing the torch, so-to-speak, and I agree with them [1]. >From what I understand, the patches that are going to be proposed will remove >HTTPS completely and encrypt

Re: [DISCUSS] realhostip.com going away

On 03.03.2014 16:58, John Kinsella wrote: I talked with some of the Citrix folk over the weekend…their position is they think they’d be doing the community a disfavor by passing the torch, so-to-speak, and I agree with them [1]. From what I understand, the patches that are going to be proposed w

Re: [4.3] Gobbledygook stats after overprovisioning

What is your overprovisioning set to? The dashboard might be correct, for example if you have 3.17T and set overprovision to 3 you'll have 9.51T of allocatable space. On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 03.03.2014 08:39, Nux! wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm on 4.3 rev 4440 (latest RC). Af

RE: Removing TAGS

What does it achieve? Tags don't cost anything. The code came from Citrix. Removing the TAGS is not going to take that away. I like having git metadata in case I need to go find something really old or understand where the code made its fork. It doesn't happen often but I do like having t

Re: [4.3] Gobbledygook stats after overprovisioning

On 03.03.2014 17:18, Marcus wrote: What is your overprovisioning set to? The dashboard might be correct, for example if you have 3.17T and set overprovision to 3 you'll have 9.51T of allocatable space. Marcus, That's the thing, I played with overprovisioning, but then set everything back to 1

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

OK, I've had a bit of time to investigate this. I noticed in CitrixResourceBase that can_bridge_firewall (which calls a plug-in on the XenServer host) returns false: if (_securityGroupEnabled) { _canBridgeFirewall = can_bridge_firewall(conn); if (!_c

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

It looks like, for example, call_firewall.sh was deleted in 0ea1c7dfc411db0d3710ac2c4fb238111cbec328 On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > OK, I've had a bit of time to investigate this. > > I noticed in CitrixResourceBase that can_bridge_firew

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

bumpUpPriority.sh and dhcp_entry.sh were deleted in 0cdf0f6f67c99a06fc1b94c2f2a38eff020f3f67 call_loadbalancer.shh was deleted in e88cc488e5a9011f2c199f906bb0dacdb95685d7 save_password_to_domr.sh was deleted in ca81e7b465fb40866fd14d1d1d27a2c42e1a2741 On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Mike Tu

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Antonio, sure I will review the patch. But please make sure that API backwards compatibly is intact, otherwise the fix won¹t be accepted. -Alena. On 3/2/14, 4:31 PM, "Antonio Fornié Casarrubios" wrote: >Hi Alena, > >The reasons for this strange format? I don't know. There doesn't seem to >be >

Re: Removing TAGS

On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > What does it achieve? Tags don't cost anything. The code came from Citrix. > Removing the TAGS is not going to take that away. > That's true they don't cost a thing, but anyone looking at the tags and not knowing the history will get conf

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:34 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > I was looking into adding support for iSCSI (CLOUDSTACK-6109) and HA of guest > vms (CLOUDSTACK-6144) for hyper-v. I don’t think I’ll be able to finish it by > 14th. > then it looks like you will have plenty of time to make these rock solid

Re: Review Request 17591: CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't contain useful information

Daan, this fix break API compatibility! All the customers using these API, will end up with broken code on their side. As the response format is changed. Can you please roll it back? Thanks, Alena. On 3/3/14, 2:03 AM, "daan Hoogland" wrote: > >---

Re: Review Request 18689: CS-19420: [UI] Fixed invalid field name (label.dynamically.scalable) on instance details.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18689/#review35989 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On March 3, 2014, 4:27 p.m., M

Re: Review Request 18689: CS-19420: [UI] Fixed invalid field name (label.dynamically.scalable) on instance details.

> On March 3, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Brian Federle wrote: > > Ship It! Also, note for next time: 'CS-19420' is an invalid bug ID. Please provide a bug that was created in the Apache JIRA. I created one for this and will ref the ID in the commit. Thanks. - Brian --

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Hi Sheng, It looks like you removed these scripts on January 16th, 17th, and 20th. Any chance this could be the cause of the bug we're seeing where XenServer hosts cannot be added to a cluster? Thanks! On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > bu

Re: Review Request 18695: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-4563: Initial zone wizard UI label issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18695/#review35993 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On March 3, 2014, 4:44 p.m., G

Re: Review Request 18695: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-4563: Initial zone wizard UI label issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18695/#review35994 --- Commit 477902379e0fad25a796ad3cbed53bec33737541 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Sorry for just notice your issue. But it's unrelated to my chance. The scripts I deleted are scripts used to access the VR, not the host... So I don't think it's the cause of your issue. These files has been replaced by executing in the VR directly. I would remove the wrong warnings. can_bridge_f

overridden compute offerings in deployVirtualMachine

I came across this code in 4.4 recently: commit e5cfe948186b825d2b28c99ce2915a5ca8498aff Author: Bharat Kumar Date: Thu Nov 28 12:34:16 2013 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-5160 add a map to specify the custom compute parameters in the deployvm api. Signed-off-by: Jayapal It looks like you can set

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Thanks, Sheng! On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Sorry for just notice your issue. But it's unrelated to my chance. > > The scripts I deleted are scripts used to access the VR, not the > host... So I don't think it's the cause of your issue. These files has > been replaced by

RE: Removing TAGS

Sebastien, It's a -0 for me. If it's important to do, sure. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:54 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Removing TAGS > > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Alex Huan

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Hi Alena, Of course, the API will not have any changes. This is not a functional change, just some refactoring. The problem is there are many things in CS that really need some refactoring otherwise the problem will continue growing more and more, but doing the change and above all making sure it

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Hugo, Just wanted to inform that myself and Min had proposed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920 which was not listed below due to wrong ticket type it had. I updated the type and now it should show in your list. Thanks, Prachi From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Beh

[PROPOSAL] Use XS HA to swithc XS master host when master host is down

Hi All, I would like to propose using XS HA to switch XS master host when XS master host is down Reason, We found below issue recently, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6177 When XS master is down, CS uses pool-emergency-transition-to-master and pool-recover-slaves API to choose

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

It looks like this problem has existed since at least February 5th. I'm currently in the process of building and running the codebase based on old commits to see where this was introduced. On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, Sheng! > >

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Hi Jayapal, I was wondering if this commit could be the reason why people can no longer add XenServer hosts to clusters? 4b3784a98e57bc22bc0a8dd53462d452c322cb8c In my case, _canBridgeFirewall is false and so an exception is thrown. Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Mike On Mon, Ma

Re: KVM

Sorry, I have enabled the debug mode. Then I show a message that I found interesting: 2014-03-03 20:24:07,979 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (main:null) failing to get physical interface from bridge virbr0, did not find an eth*, bond*, vlan*, em*, or p*p* in /sys/devices/virtual

Re: Review Request 17591: CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't contain useful information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/#review36027 --- We should revert this fix if it was already committed to the repo. R

[PROPOSAL] Ability to add new guest OS

Hi, CloudStack currently does not allow an easy way to add new guest OS types, for example, a standard way to add say, CentOS 6.5 even though a hypervisor may support it. Part of the reason is since the OS to hypervisor-specific platform mappings are currently hard-coded into the code-base [1][2]

Re: Review Request 17591: CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't contain useful information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/#review36029 --- Commit fd43cf151663c48fe29f97323490d53a7c0f9d5b in cloudstack's bran

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Along these lines, the details parameter in deployVirtualMachine seems broken. If I call "details[0].key=foo,details[0].value=bar", it stores entries in the database like this: id | vmid | name | value | display 12 | 25 | value | bar | 1 13 | 25 | key | foo

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Adding Bharat to the thread as he was the one who introduced the details param to the deployVm call. Bharat, why did you pick this format for storing the vm details? Were you following the rules from some other calls? If so, what those calls are? -Alena. On 3/3/14, 1:00 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >Al

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

FYI I was working on implementing the rootdisksize detail when I ran into this. The parameter is detected and works fine if I do 'details[0].rootdisksize=2', but this is a special one since its not persisted in the db, it's only used when allocating the root volume and then stripped off of the deta

master branch DbUtilTest failure

Hi, I am facing this error while doing a clean install on latest master. It fails running 'com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest' with error 'Could not initialize class com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy' I am on Windows. Anyone seeing this? Any ideas to fix? Prachi [INFO] ---

RE: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Hi Mike, If you are using Security group enabled zone or basic zone, you need to switch XS network mode from OVS to bridge since security group doesn't work on OVS. xe-switch-network-backend bridge. Anthony -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]

Re: Exception adding XenServer host to CS

Hi Anthony, Thanks for the reply. It looks like this is a change in 4.4. Do people have to run xe-switch-network-backend bridge before upgrading to 4.4 (if they are using a Basic Zone)? In my case, since I'm developing and able to start with a fresh DB and XenServer hosts, it looks like I can j

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

I think that would have been a more correct format from the very beginning details[0].rootdisksize=2 but right now it is no good, since we should keep them congruent, so it should be details[0].key=rootdisksize details[0].value=2 right? I mean how to pass a map in a request should be always the sam

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/#review36049 --- Dario, the patch fails to apply on the latest master, again some iss

Re: master branch DbUtilTest failure

On 03/03/2014 11:40 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: Hi, I am facing this error while doing a clean install on latest master. It fails running 'com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest' with error 'Could not initialize class com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy' I am on Windows. Anyone seeing this? Any ideas to

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- (Updated March 3, 2014, 11:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokha

Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

Hi everyone, I spent the past day or so trying to figure out with various builds why I could not add a XenServer host when creating a Basic Zone. As it turns out, as Anthony noted in another e-mail today in response to my issue, if you are using a security-group-enabled zone or a basic zone, you

RE: master branch DbUtilTest failure

Yes! The surefire log prints this: Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: File containing secret key not found: /etc/cloudstack/management/key at com.cloud.utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker.check(EncryptionSecretKeyChecker.java:91) at com.cloud.utils.db.

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/#review36052 --- Getting compilation error after applying the latest: [ERROR] Failed

Re: Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

definitely documented. 4.2 install guide: 8.2.7. Install CloudStack XenServer Support Package (CSP) (Optional) To enable security groups, elastic load balancing, and elastic IP on XenServer, download and install the CloudStack XenServer Support Package (CSP). After installing XenServer, perform t

Re: Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

bummer it now forces that route :) some people just want basic w/o security groups, where I think it doesnt matter to use the bridged backend. On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > definitely documented. 4.2 install guide: > > 8.2.7. Install CloudStack XenServer Support Packag

Re: Noteworthy change to setting up XenServer :)

It was just a surprise to me since I hadn't had a problem with this config for the past year and then all of a sudden it stopped working. On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > bummer it now forces that route :) some people just want basic w/o security > groups, where I think it

RE: master branch DbUtilTest failure

I solved it this way: The problem is with the db.properties checked in with this DbUtiltest.java - It is empty Fix is to 1) Put the right db.properties file under framework/db/test/resources 2) Set db.cloud.encryption.type=none [if you don't use encryption, so that EncryptionSecretKeyChecke

Re: Review Request 17506: mvn clean - test logs- contrail -cleanps up only target, dist directories; testclient.log file should be generated inside target directory

> On March 3, 2014, 9:30 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > is this still valid? It is not applied on master. Should it be? This must be applied to master branch. - Suresh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- (Updated March 4, 2014, 12:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokha

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

Fixed. Applied and mvn build works completely 2014-03-04 0:37 GMT+01:00 Alena Prokharchyk : >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ > > Getting compilation error after applying the latest: > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.ap

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

Personally, I feel like the rootdisksize itself should be a fully-fledged api parameter, especially where we use it to create the instance but don't actually persist it in the user_vm_details database. I began doing that and then noticed that such a parameter was actually removed with Bharat's deta

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/#review36068 --- Antonio, when you log the WARN about incorrect param name, can you p

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:13 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze > > My take is that we are slipping on RC and re-voting because we are forcing > code into the release. > [

Re: cloudstack @ github

In short - no. The list of folks who have admin rights to that repo are infra folks; largely a subset of root@, plus one or two others who actively manage the system. If you need something done, you can file Jira asking for specific things to be done; but you won't receive admin rights. --David

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:10 AM To: Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze i'm all for being flexible, but i find a lot of the arguments used here debatable. "It causes developers to rush their development to meet the deadl

Current system VM template for XenServer

Hi, I've jumped back onto 4.4 after having been on 4.3 the past few weeks and am having some trouble in 4.4 getting the agents in the SSVM and CPVM to start (both VMs show as being in the Up state in the GUI, but both agents are not listed as being in the Up state). Can someone tell me if this te

4.3 createVMSnapshot doesn't check volume state

Hi, We meet the follow case in 4.2.1: 1. deploy a vm 2. stop it 3. restore it, ROOT volume is allocated. 4. create vm snapshot Step 4 should always fail, but a createVMSnapshot job is still created without checking volume state. The problem seems also in 4.3 according to the source VMSnapsho

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Daan, Since you are the 4.4 RM we will respect your decision. -abhi On 03/03/14 2:11 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Abhinandan, first one compromis-proposal, please. > >Can we not postpone but allow for this one feature (CLOUDSTACK-6161) >this one time (4.4) to go in after feature freeze. If

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

This list is not containing CLOUDSTACK-6105 Looks like I did not set Fix Versions Properly for this ticket.. Thanks & Regards Damodar/ From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:40 PM To: Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze i'm all for

Re: Unable to deploy vm

Thanks Sanjeev, It's working fine. Regards, Tejas On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu < sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Tejas, > > It is recommended to use a clean secondary storage for storing all the > artificats, otherwise CS might overwrite since it follows standar

Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18677/#review36094 --- - Sonal Ojha On March 3, 2014, 5:58 a.m., Sonal Ojha wrote: > > -

Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18677/ --- (Updated March 4, 2014, 5:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

Re: Review Request 18616: added delete iso api to the simulator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18616/ --- (Updated March 4, 2014, 5:55 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

Parth, Can you shed some light on how this issue can be recreated. As mentioned earlier it looks like it is going through the non shared network code path, why this has happened is not very clear. Thanks Saurav On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Thank you very much. I will

  1   2   >